Kent Conrad Is Coming Against Your Private Health Insurance Plan

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

So if you want less of something you make it more expensive.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman, Kent Conrad (D-ND) told reporters that the Finance Committee was able to reduce the overall cost of the bill by cutting subsidy levels for uninsured people. Subsidy levels had originally contemplated assistance for families with incomes up to 400% of the poverty level or $88,200 for a family of 4. The eligibility for assistance would be lowered to 300% of the poverty level or $66, 150 for a family of 4.
As currently conceived, the $1 trillion bill would be fully funded by three things: tax increases, Medicare cuts and penalties assessed against employers who do not offer health insurance.
The Finance Committee version of the bill is said to include about $300 billion in new taxes. These taxes would be assessed against the value of employer sponsored health insurance. At this time there is no tax imposed on the value of health insurance premiums paid by an employer for the benefit of employees. Millions of American get their health insurance through employers and have never had to include the value of those premiums as taxable income.

A small portion of the public doesn’t have health insurance. If you take out people who aren’t citizens of this country, people who can afford it, but choose not to and people who chose not to pay for it, and people who are without for a few months we don’t really have much of a problem.
But politicians love control. They know most people are happy with the health care they receive. So he has to destroy what you have.
Apparently he wants to make your health insurance a whole lot more expensive for you to have. That’s just crazy, until you realize that providing health care isn’t really what they’re after.
They want your money and your health.
The other provisions of the Conrad health plan are great as well. They want to give someone making over $60,000 a year your money so they can buy health insurance. I’d like Kent to explain why their insurance coverage should come out of our pocket when they don’t care to buy it themselves.
I also like the lie that they’d pay for it with “Medicare Cuts.” Excuse me. Medicare is broke as it is while the costs of the program skyrocket. Sure we need to save money, but if we do, there won’t be any extra money sitting around to pay for the slackers that don’t want to pay for their own insurance.
Most people don’t realize just how much people on private health plans are already subsidizing Medicare services. I’m told by providers who would know that thirty to forty percent of what you pay to get medical services is because Medicare doesn’t pay their way. The cost gets shifted on people with private plans. That means, unlike what the politicians claim, that we are paying a tax already on our health insurance benefits.
Kent Conrad needs to be told to keep his hands off of our health care. We don’t want crappy service like the 100% government run Indian Health Service. When it comes down to it, there’s more than enough programs out there for the truly needy. This plan would be truly counterproductive.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I notice that these plans never seem to focus on PREVENTATIVE CARE.

    Why would you have to be reimbursed for keeping yourself healthy?

  • badlands4

    I am not saying you SHOULD do much of anything, but they ARE going to do it, so one of the cheapest ways to try and manage this is health savings accounts and preventative care to cut down on costs.

    Again, I send letters to our delegation over and over about this, but I KNOW they are going to do this no matter what, so I am just trying to focus on the cheapest way they could do it vs what they will do.

    Again, I am not saying that I agree, but they are going to do it anyway :(

  • badlands4

    Oh my. I hear that some want to tax your health benefits, but our healthcare is not something we can just drop. It is tricare because my dh is retired military. It is just “there” you, not something that you can drop, so I wonder if we will get taxed on that…sigh

    What a mess. I notice that these plans never seem to focus on PREVENTATIVE CARE. You want to drop costs, focus on preventative care.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    They’ve been singing that preventative care tune for years, but I think one ought to be skeptical that it would actually pay for itself.

    For example, non-smoking programs are well and fine, but a person only quits when they want to, not because someone else was willing to pay for the program or not.

  • duh moments

    Focus on preventative care? Kind of like let’s keep throwing money at cancer research for the ‘cure’…ever talk to the average worker in a cancer research facility? Ever ask them if the focus is on treatment or cure? I have. Answer: treatment. That’s pretty obvious by all the headlines we see about “one step closer to a cure”. Good luck with that one! Your dollars will be spent just as wisely on healthcare. If you never get sick, you don’t need them or their program. And then how will all those folks keep their medical profession jobs–and how will the government control everyone’s life if everyone is well??? Need to think in reality terms with these guys. Follow the money.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development