Justice Department Investigation Concludes That Bush Admin. Used Political Criteria In Hiring

Or, put another way, the Bush administration used the power of the White House to screen Justice Department lawyers in the same way every other President has.
This is such a non-scandal it’s not even funny.

U.S. President George W. Bush’s Justice Department improperly injected politics into hiring programs, a department investigation released on Tuesday found.
A report by the department’s inspector general and office of professional responsibility said members of a screening committee were asked to weed out “wackos” and ideological “extremists” who sought work in a competitive honors program for entry-level attorneys or as summer interns.
It said the committee rejected applicants with liberal or Democratic affiliations at a much higher rate than those with Republican, conservative or politically neutral backgrounds.

The Justice Department is part of the executive branch. Everyone in the Justice Department serves at the discretion of the President. If Bush wants to screen out lawyer applicants with backgrounds including liberal activism that’s his right as President, one explicitly provided him by the Constitution.
Let’s not forget that the Clintons at one point fired nearly every lawyer working for the Justice Department. There was no controversy in the media at that because, again, that’s a power the President have.
Now, liberals may not like that the Bush administration isn’t letting a bunch of liberal activists be lawyers for the Justice Department. Given that they’re liberals, they may feel that these applicants are somehow entitled to work for the justice department. But just because that’s how they feel doesn’t mean it’s true.
I, for one, wouldn’t complain if Obama chose to rid the Justice Department of many of the conservative lawyers put there during the Bush administration. It would, again, be his right to do so as President. It’s one of the reasons why who we choose as President is so important.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array wmb

    Should an AUSA appointee that is reported to be having a sexual relationship with her US Attorney, taking trips at government expense together, and getting higher then normal wage increases be protected from hiring on the basis of sexual orientation (both are female)?

    This is one case againt Gooding mentioned in particular, I tend to feel that regardless of sexual orientation, the AUSA should not have been kept on or promoted, since apparently rules were being broken in any case. There isn’t much, if anything to show that Gooding used sexual orientation as the reason according to the report, its more may have somewhat considered sexual orientation.

  • robert108

    Functional government…

    A well-known oxymoron.
    The only “function” of govt that you can depend on is taking our money.

  • jpe

    There is a federal law that states you cannot ask about political affiliation for the career positions.

    5 USC 2302(b)(1)(E): Any employee who has authority to take, direct others to take, recommend, or approve any personnel action, shall not, with respect to such authority, discriminate for or against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of marital status or political affiliation, as prohibited under any law, rule, or regulation.

    The point is to prevent the civil service, the people that make government go, from being overrun with political hacks. Functional government is anathema to the Bush administration, so this particular violation of the law isn’t so surprising.

  • robert108

    Of course, this is more leftie lying, in that conflict of ideology is not “political”.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Hey, look at what I found just by reading the report:

    The Department’s policy on nondiscrimination is contained in the
    Code of Federal Regulations, Section 42.1(a) of 28 C.F.R. Part 42,
    Subpart A, which states:

    It is the policy of the Department of Justice to seek to
    eliminate discrimination on the basis of race, color,
    religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital
    status, political affiliation, age, or physical or mental
    handicap in employment within the Department and to
    assure equal employment opportunity for all employees and
    applicants for employment (emphasis added).

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Of course you are full of hate and completely unhinged.

    Equating bush’s own AG’s words as leftie lying is, well, stupid.

    “The consideration of political affiliations in the hiring of career department employees is impermissible and unacceptable.”

    Attorney General Michael Mukasey
    Leftie liar

    The report by the Justice Department inspector general and the Office of Professional Responsibility concluded that a pair of high-ranking political appointees who are no longer with the department had violated department policy and the Civil Service Reform Act by using ideological reasons to scuttle the candidacy of lawyers who applied to the elite honors and summer intern programs.

    Culture of Corruption attempting to seed it self ahead of a permanent gop majority.

    Hubris Stymied.

    God Bless America.

  • Hawk

    Wow, another great bit of research by Rob.

    This report is about the career positions, not the political appointments.

    There is a federal law that states you cannot ask about political affiliation for the career positions.

    Clinton never did a mass firing of the career positions.

  • robert108

    The US is much closer the anarchy than it is to totalitarianism. You seem to be unable to understand the term “limited government”. No surprise.

  • MikeAdamson

    Leaving ideology aside for a moment, you know that a political party has been in power too long when patronage programs become so egregious. This is true for both liberal and conservative governments…it’s the hubris that tells many voters it’s time for a change.

  • ellinas

    You forgot this:”Attorney General Michael Mukasey, who succeeded Gonzales, said “the consideration of political affiliations in the hiring of career department employees is impermissible and unacceptable.

    He said he had accepted recommendations in the report to further guard against improper hiring factors.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Is 108 really an anarchist?

  • Neiman

    Is 108 really an anarchist?

    Well, I don’t know if he is or isn’t, but I am sure he is your intellectual superior and much better equipped to engage in rational debate than are you.

  • ellinas

    …..your intellectual superior……
    Neiman on June 24, 2008 at 06:33 pm

    Nice joke Neiman.

  • robert108

    It’s not “political affiliation”, it’s antiAmerican ideology.

    rbb: A lie is a lie, no matter who tells it, but quoting someone out of context to create a false impression is a damned lie.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    I love you Neiman.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    There is a federal law that states you cannot ask about political affiliation for the career positions.

    Which federal law would that be? Sounds like a rather stupid law to me. Presidents should be able to shape the departments under their administration as they wish.

    What you guys want is affirmative action for liberal lawyers.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development