Just 9% Of The General Population Would Like to Join a Union

image

So why are the Democrats trying to force us all into one?

Union members tend to believe that most workers want to join a labor union. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 47% of union members hold that view while only 18% disagree.
But those who don’t belong to a union hold a different perspective. By a 56% to 14% margin, they believe that most workers do not want to belong to a union.
As for personal preference, only nine percent (9%) of non-union workers would like to join a union. Eighty-one percent (81%) would not.

The problem with unions is that they are killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. Look at how they’ve destroyed the American Auto industry. GM, Ford and Chrysler are in fact bankrupt living on the charity of the taxpayers. In the rest of the economy jobs that were unionized have been shipped out to China and other places overseas.
The only place where unions are still strong are in the government sector where the jobs can’t be outsourced. Even there where they’re strong the contracts they’ve gotten are bankrupting municipalities and even states. (Hello California.)
So it’s no wonder that people with a job don’t want a union to muck it up. Because of that the unions have been unable to stop their decline. So now they’re trying to get the Democrats in Washington to strip away the protections of people that DON’T want to be in a union. That right is the right to vote in private whether or not they want the union to come in. Within the voting both the union thugs can’t intimidate the workers to vote.
If Obama and his thugs get their way the union thugs will be calling on people in their homes, in the parking lot where the workers are vulnerable and demanding their signature on a form. Once he signs that form even under duress it counts as a vote for union.
What the Democrats and the unions are doing is disgusting.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Bat One

    Wimpsinger and the machinists union, and chairman Frank Borman, a far better astronaut than corporate titan, killed off Eastern long before Lorenzen got his hands on the carcass.

    But your right, the unions preferred to kill it off, rather than work with Lorenzen to try and make it work. Typically arrogant, leftist stupidity.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    What was unfair about the wages?

    1. People were paid more than they were worth.
    2. Seniority (forget the cream of the crop rising to the top or the company promoting a better worker; it didn’t work that way).
    3. Can’t tell the union to go pound salt, even if both the employer and employee agree on a deal outside of the union (so much for freedom of choice from the “pro-choicers”)
    4. Some unions require a hefty monthly payment for up to a year before one is actually in the union.

    You want me to go on? Maybe you’ll see these problems if you’re ever in some union.

    Detroit isn’t failing due to labor, it’s failing because the companies failed to innovate.

    Both.

    And it’s not “labor”. It’s simply the union. With news of over ten thousand people paid not to work (AKA the “jobs bank”), I don’t know how the hell you can claim “labor” with a straight face.

    The problem was very little union very much arrogance.

    *shrugs* I personally witnessed an automotive company dry up and move south because of unreasonable union demands. The factory was in Ferndale. You’re from the area, right? They made brakes for GM.

    I’m sure the company was far from alone.

  • Rezistik

    In Detroit the entire economy is based around the big three if you didn’t think the wage was fair sans union you’d had best move because it wouldn’t matter otherwise.

    I didn’t think the wage was fair WITH the unions.

    Chew on that for awhile.

    And look at Detroit now. What wages? Jobs are quickly disappearing in that area and have been in a nosedive for seven straight years now.

    The job situation is much better in “right to work” states. As you ask yourself, “Who is to protect the workers?”, consider, for a moment, that it is not the union that is looking out for “the worker”. The union is killing the industries that supply the jobs for “the worker”.

    What was unfair about the wages? Detroit isn’t failing due to labor, it’s failing because the companies failed to innovate. The problem was very little union very much arrogance. They thought they could rest on “Buy American” bumper stickers and continue pushing uninnovative vehicles out while their foreign competitors innovated at every turn.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Unions were a good idea in the 19th Century, a questionable one in the 20th, and down right obsolete in the 21st.

  • Rezistik

    Who is to protect the workers? That is what I always wondered…who is to make sure workers are given fair treatment? Why do conservatives love their employers so damn much…They aren’t your parents. They don’t take care of you. Your success is based on you, someone has to protect you from them because their success is based on working hard to make you fail.

    If they have to pay fair wages they lose money…guess they should work on having a better product..

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    In Detroit the entire economy is based around the big three if you didn’t think the wage was fair sans union you’d had best move because it wouldn’t matter otherwise.

    I didn’t think the wage was fair WITH the unions.

    Chew on that for awhile.

    And look at Detroit now. What wages? Jobs are quickly disappearing in that area and have been in a nosedive for seven straight years now.

    The job situation is much better in “right to work” states. As you ask yourself, “Who is to protect the workers?”, consider, for a moment, that it is not the union that is looking out for “the worker”. The union is killing the industries that supply the jobs for “the worker”.

  • bill-tb

    Obama’s telprompter doesn’t care, we will all join the union now or else. What do you think the gulags are for.

  • jimmypop

    i didnt join my union and neither did my wife.

    I told her to ask the union guys ‘what do i get for my money’ and ‘how much goes to organized crime.’ if the person seems rattled follow with this, ‘one more question; why do white collar union leaders get paid more than the average blue workin’ man worker gets pay? it seems to me the white collar union bosses with their fancy cars and suits should make LESS than the workin’ man, right? isnt that kinda your big sales pitch?”

    the only answer they ever have is ‘well, if it wasnt for us youd still be making $1 per hour and kids would be slaves!’ while that 100% true……. we used to the ice man to keep our food cold, but because the world has evolved, we no longer do. union leaders are fun to screw with. :)

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Rezistik – Who is to protect the workers? That is what I always wondered…who is to make sure workers are given fair treatment?

    Oh, I don’t know. We have these things called laws. When you get out into the real world, you’ll see.

    Why do conservatives love their employers so damn much…They aren’t your parents. They don’t take care of you. Your success is based on you, someone has to protect you from them because their success is based on working hard to make you fail.

    Protect you from whom? “Your success is based on you”.

    If they have to pay fair wages…

    If you don’t think the wage is “fair”, then don’t work there. Simple!

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    If I remember right the union WANTED Eastern to go out of business just to “get” Frank Lorenzo.

    Talk about cutting your nose off to spite your face.

  • Buzz

    Then you have nothing to worry about, quit your bitch’n.

  • Rezistik

    Rezistik – Who is to protect the workers? That is what I always wondered…who is to make sure workers are given fair treatment?

    Oh, I don’t know. We have these things called laws. When you get out into the real world, you’ll see.

    Why do conservatives love their employers so damn much…They aren’t your parents. They don’t take care of you. Your success is based on you, someone has to protect you from them because their success is based on working hard to make you fail.

    Protect you from whom? “Your success is based on you”.

    If they have to pay fair wages…

    If you don’t think the wage is “fair”, then don’t work there. Simple!

    But it isn’t as simple as that, in some places some economies are deeply rooted around a single industry or company, in a monopoly on labor in essence. In Detroit the entire economy is based around the big three if you didn’t think the wage was fair sans union you’d had best move because it wouldn’t matter otherwise.

    Your right Robert108 not all people are equal or deserving and those that are exceptional should get paid better but when an unfair baseline pay is issued by employers attempting to maximize personal profits then the employees, ALL of the employees suffer.

  • Bat One

    Anyone else remember Eastern Airlines?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I think the people who continue to perpetuate unions today are either too weak, too unskilled or simply too lazy to create their own deal with management.

    I think you just described Buzz.

  • robert108

    Who is to protect the workers?

    If they’re adult Americans, they should protect themselves by making responsible choices, just like everyone else. You betray your Marxist programming by trying to put all “workers” in a group. The reality is that almost all people work, but they are not united by any particular feature or predetermined values. Rather, as independent individuals, they have widely diverse values and needs. You speak like a totalitarian.
    Furthermore, you make the Marxist assumption that there is an adversary relationship between employees and employers, when it is, in our system, a cooperative one. Capital and labor cooperate to make profit. That is the secret of our success as an economic system.

    If they have to pay fair wages they lose money…/quote]

    Another Marxist falsehood. The word “fair” has no set quantitative definition.

  • docdave

    Yep, proof, toot, flew them many times. As far as Easterns demise

    During Lorenzo’s tenure, Eastern was crippled by severe labor unrest. Asked to accept deep cuts in pay and benefits, Eastern’s mechanics and ramp service employees, represented by the IAM (International Assn. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers), walked out on March 4, 1989. A sympathy strike called by the pilots represented by ALPA (Air Line Pilots Assn.) and flight attendants represented by TWU (Transport Workers Union) effectively shut down the airline’s domestic operations. Non-contract employees, including airport gate and ticket counter agents and reservation sales agents, did not honor the strike. Due to the strike, flights were canceled, resulting in the loss of millions of dollars in revenue.

  • SigFan

    Oh man, now we’re going to hear from Buzz all day.

    Rodney – I concur they were needed once, and when industry realized that they could no longer legally get away with bully tactics to control workers, the need quickly evaporated. I think the people who continue to perpetuate unions today are either too weak, too unskilled or simply too lazy to create their own deal with management.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Buzz proclaims, Then you have nothing to worry about, quit your bitch’n.

    Here’s an idea: stop reading. Quit your bitching. Go somewhere else.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    In many of the union stronghold areas like plumbing, electrical, and so on, you damn near HAVE TO HAVE union membership for ONE reason: the boss is formerly an employee of someone else as a union member and now that they are management, they know from first hand exposure what the union will do to screw their business. So quite often they strike first. It’s self-perpetuating.

    However, one can be one’s own boss as even with the downturn, new houses are being built. They need new power wiring, low voltage networking, cabling for cable and DBS, etc. If you are even remotely worth your electrician’s license, you should have your own soup to nuts cabling business rocking in most states and any other necessary licenses such as for telecom and security wiring as applicable (not all electricians’ licenses cover everything). They need plumbing and running out and taking the business for yourself as a one-man act is not that hard. Same thing goes for carpentry and so on.

    You have to be smart, fast, wise. If you work a trade for ten years and still can’t come up with original ideas and figure out how to work the business without a union coddling you, you should find a different frigging line of work.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development