You asked for evidence of why John Stuart changed his name. I gave that to you.

You asked what the reason was for changing his name (marketing reasons). I gave it to you. Yes, and your evidence proves that he’s a liar and a self-hating Jew. You fell right into the trap, moron.

Someone said he was a self-hating Jew and I provided evidence of him saying he is not a self hating Jew.

He lied about that, as you have just proven, and he also lied about Truman being a “war criminal”.
See how that works?

Adolph Hitler Born Jewy Jewboy Jewiston

Self hating………Joooo?

Carlos Ray “Chuck” Norris (born March 10, 1940)

Self hating………Mexican?

Jerry Lewis Born Joseph Levitch

Self hating Joooo?

He lied about that, as you have just proven, and he also lied about Truman being a “war criminal”.
See how that works?

Yes I see how your brain works. Facts go in, shit comes out.

At one point Stewart makes the argument that foregoing waterboarding in a situation where information may prevent a terrorist attack on American citizens simply because it is the price of living in free society.

I'd like to address this notion. This is an absurd position. Government exists first and foremost to secure our citizens. If a free society means we cannot do what is necessary to prevent say the attack that was thwarted in Los Angeles, then what the hell good is government? Gov't would have failed us miserably and another terrorist attack on the scale of 9/11 could have been the result. But then again Stewart thinks Truman is a war criminal for dropping the bomb.

Jon Stewart (born Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz on November 28, 1962) is an American political satirist, television host, and stand-up comedian. …

What is it with these self-hating Joos?
Wow.

Uh, the guy is a Jew, and obviously ashamed of it as he assumed a Scottish name. Thus the self hater remark. Jeez you are stupid, hannitized.

Marilyn Monroe,[1][2] (1 June 1926 — 5 August 1962), born Norma Jeane Mortenson but baptized in the Catholic Church as Norma Jeane Baker,

Self hating……Jooooo?

John Wayne (May 26, 1907 — June 11, 1979) Born Marion Robert Morrison

Self hating……..Jooooooo?

Bob Hope Born Leslie Townes Hope

Self hating…………. female-Joooo?

Sandra Dee Born Alexandra Cymboliak Zuck

Self hating………Joooo?

Wow.

Stewart is almost as ignorant and ill educated as eunuchized.

Cliff May, president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies/
We all sleep soundly with butchy Cliff on post.

WHFF states:

I don't think most of those people you listed were Jews, and it matters not.

Hahaha! Gee, ya think? The point of demonstrating that many actors and entertainers change their names, including hard right wing political activists have changed their names, for reasons that have nothing to do with hating their identity, religious or otherwise.

What is suggests, is that you are so profoundly inadequate as an intelligent thinking individual that one would doubt you completed grade school.

Or, you could simply be a racist.

Or, you could simply be a racist.

I'm a "racist". Because some internet troll who calls itself hannitized says so. LOL!!!! You are an IDIOT.

stewart is such a dumbass…. wow.

the crowd live was so confused by this they didnt know what to do…. that would have been fun to watch as well. may f'ing owned him.

After reading Jimmy Pop, i am convinced 50% of our nation is mentally retarded. It's no wonder their brand of humor is worthless in films and in comedy.

Forget that it saved hundreds of thousands of American soldiers who didn't have to die during a land invasion of Japan. America killed it's enemies, and that's wrong. Apparently.

You have no way of knowing how many lives it saved or didn't save. It's immaterial. Even a hundred thousand American troops weren't worth the wholesale slaughter of innocents.

America didn't kill its enemies, it killed hundreds of thousands of women and children. It was wrong. Very wrong. Criminally wrong. Anybody who even thinks differently is a savage with no soul.

That's why I felt little on 9/11. How can I feel sorry for a country losing 3000 greedy republican bond traders when my whole life I've heard my country celebrating the nuking of Japanese women and children?

Feel free to use that "That's why I felt little on 9/11" quote over and over like the America hating quote from January!

Stewart is just another mindless talking head. I give him as much consideration as I give Olberman and Mathews which is NONE.

H: I'm sure if you could make a valid argument against what he has said, he will reply in kind. Absent any counter argument on your part, he wins. In other words, prove he's wrong, or at least offer some sort of argument to that effect. You don't get a free pass. It takes two sides to debate.

Self hating is not limited to the Jews. Look at all the lefties that hate being an American.

1. John Stuart does not want us to know he is a Jew.
2. He is ashamed of being a Jew.
3. John Stuart is a self hater.

Who is "John Stuart", idiot? That cartoon mouse? Is the cartoon mouse a Jew? Who knew?

hannitized specializes in being stupid and in fact is too stupid to know how much he has embarrassed himself. Idiot.

There were children, babies on the planes that the terrorists flew into the WTC.

There were hundreds of thousands of children and babies cooked in Japan. Care to tell me the difference?

There were hundreds of thousands of children and babies cooked in Japan. Care to tell me the difference?

Typical. You care more for the dead children of the enemy and total disdain for American children who would still be alive today. What a creep.

Hannitized, you have been proved wrong and as usual can't admit defeat. You are an idiot who worships any celebutard. You can't help being an idiot. Your mother must have dropped you on your head. Go worship your self hating self loathing Jewish Jew hater.

In your mind, when I provide evidence of Jon Stuart admitting he is a jew, it makes you feel that your argument that he doesn't want us to know he is a jew is validated.

Uhhh……yeah…….what ever you say bud.

You are such a middle American moron.

Crocetti is Italian.

HanJob, The majority of actors and tv personalities change their names for the image. Don't bother to act so deliberately stupid, we know you well enough by now.

Don't post when you are high. It shows.

"…in [July] 1945… Secretary of War Stimson, visiting my headquarters in Germany, informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act. …the Secretary, upon giving me the news of the successful bomb test in New Mexico, and of the plan for using it, asked for my reaction, apparently expecting a vigorous assent.

"During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face'. The Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude…"

- Dwight Eisenhower, Mandate For Change, pg. 380

"It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons.

"The lethal possibilities of atomic warfare in the future are frightening. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children."

- Admiral William Leahy, I Was There, pg. 441.

Jon Stewart is the real 'The One'.

…and Harry Truman was a war criminal. He didn't listen to his generals.

Kevin

What is it with these self-hating Joos?

Racist POS.

Boob, I don't think you can blame Eisenhower for not being fully conversant on the Pacific Theater.

However he was wrong for thinking that Japan was defeated. They were going to defend their home islands.

I think if Ike was C in C of the Pacific Theater he would have bombed Japan mercilessly like he did the German cities.

No mention of of republican or democrat, just a bond trading company who lost 638 employees. Care to try again stemless?

Dropping the two nuclear bombs was necessary

No it wasn't.

Please support your claim, using facts, logic and cause/effect reasoning. We ended the war; so what is your fantasy version of how the war might have been ended otherwise.

No mention of of republican or democrat, just a bond trading company who lost 638 employees.

Only 638? Damn.

Carrick, better get a move on. The other researchers are probably waiting to have coffee and discuss the big game from yesterday.

DINO:

Carrick, better get a move on. The other researchers are probably waiting to have coffee and discuss the big game from yesterday.

Hey look! It's more sour grapes from Dino the Socialist Dino Sour, the secret identify of The Audacity to Be Clueless Man

<img src="http://sayanythingblog.com/images/avatars/uploads/avatar_6137.jpg"&gt;

<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3662/3486055507_1f2ab8488f_o.jpg"&gt;

The "A" is for Audacity.

Carrick: I have always assumed that the "A" was for asshole.

Robert108:

Carrick: I have always assumed that the "A" was for asshole.

Well there you go. Glad I could straighten that out for you.

Gee, some people have thought of a way to take a down economy and continue to make a profit – how shocking. Unlike the liberal hero George Soros who has admitted to making over a $billion in the last year because of the down economy and remarking that this whole "crisis" is the culmination of his life's work.

Dino:

Perhaps you're already at the reseach office surfing the net and getting your grant-funded pay for doing nothing.

LOL. Dino still thinks that we can keep research funding without being productive. Try doing that for more than about two years and you lose your funding where I work.

Really, no doubt this is just Sour Grapes from Dino Sour who no doubt was fired from his university position for being stupid and lazy.

Oh look, it's more sour grapes for Dino!

<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3662/3486055507_1f2ab8488f_o.jpg"&gt;

The JAPS did not declare war on us, they just attacked. The ate our GIs. They did not observe any of the rules of war. LOAC. We actually killed more of their civilians during the firebombing of Tokyo than the two nukes combined.

We were attacked on 12/7/41.

Republicans hate Jon Stuart because in their minds, he makes hating America cool.

In a normal persons mind, he just makes being honest, funny. And he shows us that it is OK to love your country and admit it's mistakes.

Carry on children.

Hawk: Which "race" would that be?

H: When you mistakenly say: "Republicans hate…", you are projecting your own leftie hate on others who simply don't agree with your ideology.
Jon Stewart is simply full of shit, as usual.

Since Wankertized says "Republicans hate Jon Stewart" and I have proven that they don't, (at least enough of them to prove once again that Wankertized hasn't the faintest clue what he's talking about. Ever.), here's a bit of Jon Stewart for the rest of us non-haters to enjoy!

H: When you mistakenly say: "Republicans hate…", you are

….not using the word "all".

Any questions?

It is not.

Two lies: One, Jews are not a "race", and Two, why did Jon Stewart change his name from Jewish to Scottish? You have yet to answer that one.

Using Jon Stuart to bash Obama (in your mind) is not an example of you "liking" him, but rather "using" him.

The truly clueless troll still can't spell Stewart's name correctly, even after having been corrected!! Are you truly mentally impaired, Hannitwit? Or is "liking" simply yet another word that you are clueless to the meaning?

As to liking him, had you gone to the link with an ability to read and comprehend simple English, you would have seen:

Got to admit there were more than a couple of laugh out loud moments here!

Now, for the less than brilliant twit with the damp, yellow stained swimtrunks, the "laugh out loud" part, meant I thought he was funny! Funny enough for me to, wait for it…laugh out loud. Kind of like everyone here does with your comments (when they're not groaning), only your humor is clearly unintentional! Heh.

Robert lies again:

why did Jon Stewart change his name from Jewish to Scottish? You have yet to answer that one.

I answered that like…..(4) times. Here it is again:

The point of demonstrating that many actors and entertainers change their names, including hard right wing political activists have changed their names, for reasons that have nothing to do with hating their identity, religious or otherwise.

and…

My counter argument to that was to provide evidence after evidence that demonstrates many actors have changed their name for marketing reasons. You have not provided any evidence to suggest he is ashamed of being Jewish.

and…
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/jon_stewart_harr…

Count all the times that Jon Stewart's name is spelled correctly.

Why does it matter if I spell John Stuarts name wrong? Spelling it correctly would make it Google searchable. Nobody should have to read this much racist hatred directed at John.

but that it does not prove you don't hate him.

…bleats the logic impaired twit! You obviously don't take my word for it (just like I don't take yours when you "wager" a thousand dollars that you refuse to put up!), but you have zero, zip, nada evidence to the contrary, so you conclude it is true! What a Wanker you are, Wankertized!

I don't have to prove a negative, Wankertwit. You made the ass-ertion that Republicans hate Stewart (even though you said "Stuart", like a really dumb wanker!), so the onus is on you to back up what you say.

You could Google "Jon Stewart" over at Proof Positive, but then, you'd have to pull your head out of your ass long enough to spell his name correctly, which you haven't been able to do here! So, for the spelling impaired, logic impaired incontinent troll, here is another post I made by Mr. Stewart.

There, I stated that I was not a "big fan" (which, for the logic impaired doesn't equal "hate"), mostly because I don't think he's funny very often!

Still, that's 200% more times than you put in your blog or in any reader blogs! Why do you hate Jon Stewart, Han-job? Is that why you constantly misspell his name??? Heh.

I don't have to prove a negative, Wankertwit. You made the ass-ertion that Republicans hate Stewart (even though you said "Stuart", like a really dumb wanker!), so the onus is on you to back up what you say.

Where did I say "all" Republicans hate John Stuart? I said Republicans, and Republicans do….the examples are all over this thread.

You really aren't very good with this whole logic thing, are you Poofie?

Why does it matter if I spell John Stuarts (sic) name wrong?

Well, it might make you look like less of an ignorant dumb f*ck, especially in a thread specifically about his name!!!

Spelling it correctly would make it Google searchable.

The dumb f*ckiness continues! Yes. And since there are already an overabundance of references to his name correctly spelled, you do not prevent anyone from Googling this thread with your stupidity, but you guarantee that only the terminally stupid people would see your comments.
Very clever Han-job! Find a group of admirers as stupid as yourself! You could then be Kahuna of a much bigger kiddie pool! Heh.

Here is the answer: John Stuart changed his name for marketing reasons.

Another unsupported claim from you, H. Do you have any evidence to back it up? How does the switch from a Jewish name to a Scottish name enhance his marketability?
If you maintain "marketing reasons", what are those reasons?
Why wasn't his Jewish name as marketable as the Scottish name?
Inquiring minds want to know.

Another unsupported claim from you, H. Do you have any evidence to back it up?

You mean aside from all those examples of other people in Hollywood, who changed their name????? Aside from all that evidence?

How does the switch from a Jewish name to a Scottish name enhance his marketability?

John Stuart said his real last name was too "Hollywood".

Here you go…read it for yourself. Ya putz.

Born Jonathan Stewart Leibowitz, he started using his middle name as his surname in 1987. "I'm not a self-hating Jew," he once said. "Actually, to borrow a line from Lenny Bruce, I just thought Leibowitz was too Hollywood."

Damn im good.

John Stuart said his real last name was too "Hollywood".

What's wrong with being "Hollywood", then? Too Jewish?
You have yet to make any sense, H, and you still can't comment on the topic of this thread, which is not your lack of intellectual prowess.

Facts go in, shit comes out.

More projection from you; you proved that both you and Stewart are liars.

The facts are that Stewart changed his name because it was too Jewish, by his own admission. You just don't know how to think, H, and it makes you an easy target for the intelligent conservatives(but I repeat myself) on this blog.
We all make fun of you, and you just don't get it.

Knobert says:

The facts are that Stewart changed his name because it was too Jewish, by his own admission.

But Stuart said:

Born Jonathan Stewart Leibowitz, he started using his middle name as his surname in 1987. "I'm not a self-hating Jew," he once said. "Actually, to borrow a line from Lenny Bruce, I just thought Leibowitz was too Hollywood."

Doh! Sucks to be Knobert.

The bottom line here(of your distraction, that is) seems to be that Jon Stewart didn't think his Jewish name was good enough to be honest about. If that isn't self-hate, what is?

Why is he ashamed of being a Jew?

For the same reason these people changed their names:

John Wayne
Charlton Heston
Chuck Norris
Dean Martin
Marylin Monroe
Lenny Bruce
Ect.
Ect.
Ect.

For the same reason these people changed their names:

Wrong, simpleton! It's not that old "everybody does it for the same reason" bullshit. How many times do you have to be smacked for that lie?

Again, simpleton: When Stewart admitted that he considered his Jewish name "too Hollywood", he was admitting that he is a self-hating Jew. He lied, and you repeat his lie. He also lied about Harry Truman being a "war criminal".

Hannah:

You are a racist, because you actually think being a Jew is something someone would be ashamed of, and not simply because the name he had isn't as marketable or as "sexy" as Stewart.

What a delusion twat you can be.

Many Jews change their name to fit in with the larger gentile world to avoid issues with Jew-hating morons. It's one of the issues that come under the heading of assimilation, which is a sore point within Judaism.

A large number of those who'd fancy themselves enlightened or liberal Jews are not proud of their heritage and see it as embarrassing especially with regard to dealing with gentiles.

This is not different than all those raised Christian who feel embarrassed for their religious relatives and try to disown them and the faith they started in, but among Jews the concept of the "self-hating Jew" is taken both seriously and not seriously unlike in Christianity where the concept is almost non-existent. More often the latter as a matter of sarcasm, but often enough the former in the case of people like Stewart who attack Israel and religious Jews just to ingratiate themselves with antisemite leftists.

Behind the scenes there are a lot of Jewish names and there's a lot of Jews who would and have as he did think ahead to the large number of Jew haters and seek to head it off by disowning his name. It seems clear to me that Stewart was afraid that the Liebowitz name would be too Jewish.

While that does not mean he is disowning his heritage, I am among those who'd say backing down in fear of possible antisemitism in an effort to avoid tangling with those dumb fucks is cowardly and the first step.

The second step is constant slams on your own people and Israel just to get in good with gentiles who at the end of the day still don't like you simply because you're a Jew. You will never be loved by them and they will never be your friend and never want you at their dinner table for you as a person until you earn their respect and showing defeat in fear of their dislike of your religion doesn't earn that respect. It earns you their private scorn and brings it on your fellows.

cramer:

And Dino, I agree that Truman dropping the bomb could be considered criminal.

And you ask us about retardation? You just agreed with an avowed hater of America, children, cops, and everything else. That alone disqualifies you on the spot. The claim that Truman's order could be considered criminal is just window dressing. Military actions taken against centers of military weapons manufacture, national industry, national infrastructure, and military bases during declared war are not now nor have they ever been considered criminal when conducted as a matter of destroying those targets.

Both bomb sites were qualified targets within the home ground of a state which had murdered millions between China and the Pacific in a war they themselves started without official declaration and without historical chain of events that any reasonable person would believe entitled them to their actions and the level of intensity thereof.

cramer:

All the innocent women and children should not be considered our enemies.

BOMBS, BULLETS, ETC. DO NOT AND CAN NOT DISCRIMINATE. Not ours, not the Japanese Imperial Army, not the Nazis, etc. War is not fun, it is not cool, it is not an adventure. It is bloody, mad, horrid business and absolute destruction of one's society is what is courted by those who wage wars without any reason. Japan and Germany waged war to destroy their enemies without regard to civilian or military, with the actual goal of decimating their enemies' populations. We had no choice but to return fire and stop them or be destroyed.

It is not moral or ethical to resign oneself to suicide at the hands of a would-be destroyer just to avoid killing them. If you had been the president and done what you think Truman should have, the American survivors of your barbaric imbecility would be massing in what was left of Virginia digging down to your bunker to kill you themselves.

cramer:

To think otherwise is barbaric. But that doesn't mean the same isn't true of 9/11. I do feel that there is an element of "we had it coming" with the way Americans often deal with the rest of the world. But that doesn't excuse 9/11 or make it any less evil and horrifying.

Nice try to be on every side of the issue. Nothing we have ever done anywhere justified the organization of Al Queda killing several thousand innocent civilians, the health and eventually the lives of a few thousand more, and destroying billions of dollars of property and economic power. Nothing. What they did was an ambush on behalf of a concept. The idea that our resistance to Islamic Supremacism was a sin. To say we had it coming would be as absurd as saying Jews has the Holocaust coming because they refuse to convert to Christianity.

You're a moron.

While that does not mean he is disowning his heritage, I am among those who'd say backing down in fear of possible antisemitism in an effort to avoid tangling with those dumb fucks is cowardly and the first step.

Ok genius. If Stuart is so afraid of being outed as a Jew. Why does he admit he is a jew in his stand up comedy routine and constantly admit to being a jew on the Daily Show?

Your ignorance is reaching new lows in stupidity.

Let's see. Attacking a military installation encroaching on their turf is equated to mass murdering hundreds of thousands of women and children.

You soulless FREAKS. Bloody savages.

Encroaching on their turf? Hawaii? When has Hawaii ever been Japanese turf? Are you serious? I guess you skipped over my point about the innocent women and children being trained to attack Marines and Soldiers with sticks. Don't you think that stopping 1/3 or more of their population from being killed and lowering Allied casualties would be a good thing. Here are the casualty figures for Okinawa…Casualties totaled more than 38,000 Americans wounded and 12,000 killed or missing, more than 107,000 Japanese and Okinawan conscripts killed, and perhaps 142,000 Okinawan civilians who perished in the battle.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/o…

The casualties on Okinawa figure were what caused Truman to drop the bomb. Japan had a population of around 70,000,000 so a 1/3 casualty rate gives us 21,000,000 dead. Casualty rates in Nagasaki and Hiroshima were figured at:
Nagasaki Hiroshima
Dead 66,000 39,000
Injured 69,000 25,000
Total Casualties 135,000 64,000
http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/MED/med_chp10.s…

Which works out to 199,000 killed or wounded, less than 249,000 mostly killed on Okinawa. If you add in American casualties we get 287,000 total casualties from the invasion of Okinawa. Operation Downfall, the invasion of Japan was to take place in two parts, Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet. A study done for Secretary of War Henry Stimson's staff by William Shockley estimated that conquering Japan would cost 1.7 to 4 million American casualties, including 400,000 to 800,000 fatalities, and five to ten million Japanese fatalities. The key assumption was large-scale participation by civilians in the defense of Japan. To show you how serious the Japanese were about this kind of thing here's a good quote, "One mobilized high school girl, Yukiko Kasai, found herself issued an awl and told, "Even killing one American soldier will do. … You must aim for the abdomen."

So I can see why Truman dropped the bomb, 199,000 casualties is much less than five to ten million dead Japanese (to include your innocent high school girls attacking US Marines and Soldiers armed with Browning .30 cals, M-1's, Thompsons and BAR's.) with an AWL! That's even more pitiful than a bamboo pike! Its easy to call people soulless Freaks if you don't have a sense of history, empathy or proportion. I know you don't know about history because you started your rant with the stupidest thing I have ever heard on this blog to date.

You can spin the nuking of Japan any which way you want but it was still mass murder of civilians for which this cesspool country deserves to suffer hundreds more
9/11s.

Truman was a war criminal who should have been hanged for what he did. Anyone who agrees with the nuking of Japan such as potato is subhuman garbage.

I love seeing this country living in fear of another 9/11 or a nuking by their many "enemies". The anxiety and fear is what America deserves for committing such a horrible act. At the time, the rest of the world should have isolated and destroyed America economically for what they did.

And dinothefakehomo? You do know that Jon Stewart is a comedian, right? Nothing he says is real. It is all his shtick, a way to make money and not connected to reality in anyway what so ever. Right?

You know NOTHING about Hollywood, Jews in entertainment, the slightest bit of it all.

Really? What do you know about Hollywood? I have walked down the red isle, my girlfriend of 8 years in is the biz. I have dated a women who had serious a relationship with Dennis Quaid. I have plenty-o-gossip.

What do you know about hollywood? Other than it's filled with Jooo's, that you hate?

For the same reason so many other Jews in entertainment do. To get gentiles to laugh at the silly Jew. He's saying, "look what a buffoon I am. I'm not like those other Jews. You can be comfortable with me." He's not doing the sort of old-time inside jokes intended to get a smile from fellow Jews, he takes superficial shots at other Jews designed to make gentiles laugh.

Are you in Hollywood? Because I am now laughing AT YOU, not with you.

Hahaha, jezus you are a schmuck!

Oops! You should not have said that to sanni. It really, REALLY hates all you dirty Jooos. It being so superior to you and whatnot. It will be oh, so cross with you now!

I agree with Jon Stewardt. The bomb could have been dropped somewhere else to catch Japan's attention of what would be waiting for them if they didn't stop war. Of course, Japan would's stop, so then you could justify MAYBE dropping the bomb on a city, but only if they don't listen the first time. But there was no first time and the purpose of saving lives is more or less correct but at the same time it was a big opportunity to see what damage could be caused on an urban area, the effect on humans over a long period of time. It was the perfect time to show power, make a cruel experiment and win the war by avoiding more deaths. But Definitively there are many war criminals and terrorists in America. However, Americans refuse to accept this as if they were really rocking and considered "the best of the world" No wonder why they sink now. Nobody wants Americans to rule this world anymore.

You can spin the nuking of Japan any which way you want but it was still mass murder of civilians for which this cesspool country deserves to suffer hundreds more
9/11s.

Again, a hearty fuck you Dino. Its not spin dumbass, its historical fact. I don't see you worrying about the innocents in China, the Philippines, Korea or any of the other places we had to liberate. Oh the mean ole US fighting and ending a war another country started! How dare they end the war and not cause another 11 million casualties. By the way dumbass, Portland is in range of all those missles and nukes, not Alabama. I don't want anyone to die by nukes, apparently you are stupid enough to want that even though your dumbass is much more likely to get crispy than I am. What an idiot you are Dino!

You will NEVER justify the cooking and vaporizing of hundreds of thousands of Japanese women and children. You can try with talk of Japanese atrocities (most probably fiction to justify America's crime against humanity) but that doesn't absolve America for its actions. Your innane predictions of 11 million more causalties is pure bullshit speculation. Did you read RBB's posted quotes from Eisenhower and other military leaders decrying the use of such a devastating weapon?

Using nukes also set off decades of fear and anxiety over someone using it again. Now we think we can put the genie back in the bottle and stop everyone else from gaining the technology to produce their own. Good luck with that.

America's fear of nukes is delightful punishment for their evil actions. A fitting neurosis for a power hungry, imperialistic people who think they are ordained to rule the world.

I don't live in fear of Portland getting nuked. That constant fear is a conservative pathology. The only thing that will alleviate it is to kill everyone else in the world, something I fear many conservatives would like to see.

Dino, you do live in constant fear, the fear of the conservative boogy man and their actions. That's why you want to put everyone into camps.

You can try with talk of Japanese atrocities (most probably fiction to justify America's crime against humanity) but that doesn't absolve America for its actions. Your innane predictions of 11 million more causalties is pure bullshit speculation. Did you read RBB's posted quotes from Eisenhower and other military leaders decrying the use of such a devastating weapon?

I did read them, its easy after the fact to question anything, by the way the 11 million figure is not mine, I didn't make it up. Why don't you go do some research for a change and show me different numbers? You won't, why because you are lazy and the numbers don't get much better no matter what estimate you come up with. Why is bombing civilians any different from shooting them with an M-1 or burning them as they attack you with an M-2 flamethrower? How's it any different from dropping incendiary bombs to create a firestorm? As was eluded to earlier, we killed more people by creating a firestorm in Tokyo that we did with both atomic bombs. In reality, its not, but you are braying on about them being war crimes because you are either ignorant of history (a sure bet) or for some reason you can't don't think you can use it as a cudgel to browbeat people with "evil" American actions. Sometimes, I don't know if you are serious or not when you post over the top things. I do know that either way, if you are serious or trolling, that you are an evil person, a jerk and someone I should never spend another minute thinking about. The only reason I bothered to respond to you this time is that someone may read your idiotic post, and not knowing history, really believe that "Japanese Atrocities" are American propaganda.

Man, you are a retard. I am a Jew and so are my wife and mother-in-law.

So? John Stuart is a Jew. According to you, he is a self-hater and he hates the Jews, so why the double standard?

If you believe it's impossible for you to hate Jews because you are one, then so is it impossible for John Stuart.

Man…..you. Are. A. Dumb ass.

Prove that statement with facts and logical rational. Your emotional responses are a joke

It's a matter of history; you can look it up, if you know how to do that. The A-bombs were dropped after detailed analysis of the outcome of a land invasion of Japan.
If you don't already know this, you have once again proved that you know nothing.

It's a matter of history; you can look it up, if you know how to do that.

That is simply ridiculous. It is not a matter of history to make a statement about how many lives could have been saved. It is called a hypothetical.

There is no logic behind Suite Potatoheads comment that 100 times as many lives would have died if we didn't drop the bombs, but there rarely is any logic spewed by that moron.

Perhaps Hannah should read up on the phenomenon of left wing Jews who attack their fellow Jews, Judaism, and Israel.

Here's a starting place:
http://www.zionism-israel.com/log/archives/000006…

Yes you f'n moron, there are Jews who are so neurotically embarrassed by their own people and so anxious to be loved by gentiles who they suspect, believe, have reason to know, or definitely know have no real love for Jews that they will engage in works embracing the antisemitic screed of the The Protocols.

If Stewart wants to look out on the modern world and still can't bring himself to keep his given name just so he can fit in, that's one thing. When he makes a point of going out of his way to throw verbal stones at fellows to ingratiate himself with others, he's an idiot.

Thankfully he's either had the conscience to see that his statement on Truman was wrong or at the very least done the social calculus and thought ahead to the kind of drubbing this could earn him in the press for saying something so incendiary.

Idiots like you Hannah are so deranged so can't recognize when you're looking like idiots.

SuitePatatohead show his racist thinking:

If Stewart wants to look out on the modern world and still can't bring himself to keep his given name just so he can fit in, that's one thing. When he makes a point of going out of his way to throw verbal stones at fellows to ingratiate himself with others, he's an idiot.

But none of that suggests he is trying to keep his Jewishness secret or that he is a self-hating jew.

Stewart simply disagrees with their politics as he does those on the right.

You are singling out his stance on the Mid East in an attempt to paint a picture in your fat head, that is not representative of the facts or reality.

Idiots like you Hannah are so deranged so can't recognize when you're looking like idiots.

I am embarrassed for your family. So I am deranged, because I take John Stuart at his word and not your imagination that he hates himself?

Do you even listen to yourself man? You are a flippin idiot.

Naw! He is to good at reading from the teleprompter. We couldn't have that!

And keep up the good work, Tater. You got sanni crying and it ain't even dark yet!

He's already been told my wife and me are Jews. Still he goes on with claims of racism.

Racist thinking is not the same as being racist, you total moron. What you are suggesting is that Jon is so ashamed of being Jewish, BECAUSE OF OTHER RACISTS, that he has to change his name to fit in.

That is racist thinking on your behalf, but it is not racist of your actions.

Can anyone seriously be this stupid?

So… in his deranged mind I'm the racist for defending Jews against other Jews tearing them down for the sake of amusing and fitting in with non-Jews.

Not racist, just racist thinking. As I stated earlier, please stop trying to argue with me, you aren't smart enough to understand my arguments.

Racist thinking is not the same as being racist, you total moron. What you are suggesting is that Jon is so ashamed of being Jewish, BECAUSE OF OTHER RACISTS, that he has to change his name to fit in.

That is racist thinking on your behalf, but it is not racist of your actions.

On your behalf??? You don't really know what that means, do you? You just said it because you thought it sounded smart? You really should buy a dictionary sometime! Or have someone read one to you!

1. in or on behalf of, as a representative of or a proxy for: On behalf of my colleagues, I address you tonight.
2. in or on (someone's) behalf, in the interest or aid of (someone): He interceded in my behalf.

it is not racist of your actions

Sorry! That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever!

Can anyone seriously be this stupid?

In the words of the Obama campaign: Yes, you can, Wankertized! Yes, you can!

behalf

noun
1. as the agent of or on someone's part (usually expressed as "on behalf of" rather than "in behalf of"); "the guardian signed the contract on behalf of the minor child"; "this letter is written on behalf of my client";

On whose part? On Suite Patatohead's.