Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, May 12, 2008

John McCain’s Head’s They Win, Tails You Lose Stand On Energy Development

I saw this doozie at the Washington Post.

On the campaign trail, McCain is more than eager to go toe-to-toe with skeptics of global warming who attend his town hall forums. When a man in Michigan asked him last week why the United States was not drilling in the Arctic refuge and off California’s coasts, McCain replied that, as a federalist, he thinks states have the right to make those decisions.

“I can’t say we should drill in the most pristine parts of America,” he told the questioner, adding that he believes in finding new sources of oil, “But I also believe sooner or later we have got to become energy-independent, we’ve got to reduce greenhouse gases. That means nuclear, wind, solar, tide, et cetera.”

Holtz-Eakin said McCain is flexible in his federalist approach when it comes to the question of drilling because, while many Alaskans support opening the Arctic refuge to oil and gas exploration, the senator has concluded that it’s not worth exposing 250 species of wildlife there to damage.

For the most part, McCain follows a fairly instinctive approach to deciding environmental questions. In recent interviews he has said he thinks the government should list polar bears as endangered because shrinking sea ice threatens their survival, that sharks deserve protection because they’re a crucial part of the marine food web, and that the nation needs to act on climate change because it risks an environmental catastrophe if it doesn’t.

Is this the depth of his understanding of the issue.  He claims it’s a states rights issue and his advisor has to go out there and contradict his bosses statement in order to reconcile his actions (voting against development in ANWR) with his statement. 

Meanwhile the candidate thinks that Polar Bears are endangered.  Except that there are more of them than we’ve seen before. PLUS they managed to survive previous warm periods just fine. 

Does this guy care about the facts or just his rhetoric?

Comments

Apparently, nothing was learned from the ethanol scam.

Kevin on May 12, 2008 at 03:13 pm

It’s depressing....

The guys a dope.

golfmann on May 12, 2008 at 05:04 pm

This is why I am upset we don’t have CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE representing Conservative values. I am sick and tired of these RINO telling us they are republicans then in the next breath I can’t tell the difference between them and Ted Kennedy.


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on May 12, 2008 at 07:34 pm

But you’ll vote for them anyway.


“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

realitybasedbob on May 12, 2008 at 07:48 pm

He’s your guy.

McCain ranks last among the 535 members of the current Congress in a rating by the League of Conservation Voters.

McCain has missed every major environmental vote this Congress, according to an analysis by the League. His League lifetime record is just 24 percent. This compares with 86 percent for Obama and 86 percent for Clinton. Obama and Clinton ranked 67 and 73 percent in the League’s most recent report.

“McCain was the only member of Congress to skip every single crucial environmental vote scored by the organization, posting a score lower than Members of Congress who were out for much of the year due to serious illnesses–and even lower than some who died during the term,” a release from the Sierra Club noted

Sayin one thing , Doin another

WOOF on May 12, 2008 at 09:04 pm

He’s your guy.

And he is still a far, far more reasonable choice than Obama!


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on May 12, 2008 at 09:33 pm

And he is still a far, far more reasonable choice than Obama!

I can agree here with you Bat and still have a great deal of consternation over McCain’s policies.

Should I let my daughter date a unmistakable loser just because I refused to previously let her attend some function with a scum bag? After all the loser has some redeeming qualities.

I know it’s not that simple, but this country is leaning and tilting further to left with ever passing day. We have politicians and Hollywood starlets deciding our fate with a bevy unwarranted ( and undecipherable ) scientific balderdash. And people like McCain just keep playin’ to the crowd. Wonderful.


“To love is not to stare steadfast at one another...it is to look forward, in the same direction.”
Saint-Exupéry

laydownSally on May 12, 2008 at 10:20 pm

Please forgive the typos and omissions. I’m not myself today.


“To love is not to stare steadfast at one another...it is to look forward, in the same direction.”
Saint-Exupéry

laydownSally on May 12, 2008 at 10:22 pm

LaydownSally!  Where have you been!!  I’ve missed your voice on unreasonable reason… typos and all!  smile


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on May 13, 2008 at 03:35 am

So McC supports Alaska’s bid to open drilling in ANWR? Really?


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on May 13, 2008 at 05:44 am

Yep, exactly.  He just doesn’t know why. 

(OK he does know why it’s to appease the whack job moonbats who aren’t going to vote for him.)


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on May 13, 2008 at 06:28 am

pparets,

I’ve missed your voice on unreasonable reason…

How odd...that’s the same thing the scum-bag said!


“To love is not to stare steadfast at one another...it is to look forward, in the same direction.”
Saint-Exupéry

laydownSally on May 13, 2008 at 10:46 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.