John Kerry: The Fairness Doctrine Is A Must

Democrats have been trying to sweep their support for re-instituting the fairness doctrine under the rug since they took power in Congress, but it’s become pretty clear that they’ve got conservative talk radio in their targets.
Here’s John Kerry talking about it:


Transcript:

“I think the Fairness Doctrine ought to be there and I also think equal time doctrine ought to come back. I mean these are the people who wiped out one of the most profound changes in the balance of the media is when the conservatives got rid of the equal time requirements. And the result is that, you know, they’ve been able to squeeze down and squeeze out opinion of opposing views and I think it’s been an important transition in the imbalance of our public…”

The problem is that liberal voices aren’t being squeezed out of broadcast media because of some nefarious scheme among broadcast stations but rather because people simply aren’t interested in listening to liberal opinionators.
Air America has been attempted in every major radio market in America – from New York to L.A., Seattle to Chicago – and it’s largely failed. Or has gotten meager ratings. Meanwhile, conservative talk radio has flourished in these areas. Liberal talk radio’s most successful act, Ed Schultz, consistently gets whipped in ratings by his conservative counterparts in radio markets across the nation. Why?
Because more people want to listen to conservative talkers than liberal talkers.
Now maybe that’s because talk radio tends to be a medium more conservatives tend to listen to than liberals. Or it could just be that conservative talk radio is more entertaining. I don’t know. But either way, why should the government get to step in dictate to Americans what they will and will not have on their radios for programming just because someone like John Kerry doesn’t think enough broadcast talk or political shows endorse his political viewpoint?

Tags: , , , ,


«
»
  • MikeAdamson

    Now maybe that's because talk radio tends to be a medium more conservatives tend to listen to than liberals. Or it could just be that conservative talk radio is more entertaining. I don't know.

    Based on my limited sampling of the American airwaves I suspect that both of these suggestions are true.

    Out of curiosity, who owns the American radio frequencies?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Maybe the Democrats could take the Fairness Doctrine to their friends in Hollywood! For every multimillion dollar blockbuster starring a liberal, there must be as many multimillion dollar blockbusters starring conservatives.

    We could go down the line…directors, producers, script writers, best boys…quotas for everybody!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Out of curiosity, who owns the American radio frequencies?

    The government "owns" them, which is why the FCC can control content. Currently mostly just obscenity issues.

    I think the government's "ownership" of the airwaves is an anachronism. Out side a regulatory role to ensure that broadcasters don't fall all over each other, the government should just butt out. It certainly shouldn't be involved in regulating content, which is something people can do themselves by changing the station, getting satellite radio, etc.

    I think we can agree, Mike, that liberal radio's failings should be blamed on the liberals who have given it a shot and not any action of the radio industry as a whole. Liberal radio shows have been tried again and again, from Schultz to Air America, and they've either failed or been only marginally successful due to lack of listeners.

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Robert Perry

    Mike, the "owner" of the radio frequencies is supposedly the public, in reality the government, hence they did at one point claim that there was a constitutionality to the old "Fairness Doctrine."

    One interesting side note is that the AM band was dying, except among oldsters, until the Fairness Doctrine was repealed and Limbaugh came along. So does Mr. Kerry propose to kill of the AM band, more or less? I think that whether he likes it (admits it) or not, he does.

    And if it's an Air America station, it would be a mercy killing, the only one that I'd support. Talk about awful programming…

    The ugly reality about this is that Kerry and others are simply trying to get through legislation what they could not get in the marketplace of ideas, and they're especially ticked because it's been crucial to get conservative ideas into the marketplace of ideas–making liberal icons like Dan Rather and others look rather silly in the bargain.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    This is censorship, plain and simple.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    The government "owns" them

    The government regulates them and licenses them for "the public interest". One of the reason you hear so many "public service announcements" at three AM (or whenever the station can't sell a spot) is to justify their existence when their license comes up for renewal.
    If you want to see a broadcaster break into a "flop sweat", go into any radio or TV outlet and ask to see their "Public file". That contains a record of all the things they do to meet local public interest. (Usually, the only people who ask to see the "public file" are rabble rousers or people looking to contest their license renewal so as to establish a license of their own.)

  • Steve L.

    I would think that the Democrats would want to keep their views off the radio. Can you imagine some of the DUers or Kossacks with radio shows? People would never vote for Democrats again.

  • Bat One

    I am amazed that anyone would care one iota what John Kerry had to say about anything. Kerry makes Roman Hruska look not only brilliant, but positively competent by comparison.

  • 2Hotel9

    Radio and TV broadcasters are only a smokescreen in all this. Democrats and Leftards worldwide have one target in their Jihad. The Internet. Governments all over the world are steadily clamping down on the free flow and exchange of ideas and information through the Internet.

    I got no problem with equal time in broadcasting, as long as it is applied evenly across the board. Treat everyone the same, just like sh it. EEOC baby!!

  • Eneils Bailey

    Does this mean that John Kerry woke up from his Rip Van Winkle Senatorial nap and decided that playing Liberal politician for a spell would make Teresa loosen up her bank account.

    It's never too late to hop on a Liberal trend, especially when you don't have to proclaim that you have changed your mind. "I was not against this before I was for it."

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Soooo! Are there any Democrats who believe that John Kerry should be the poster boy for fairness??? Is it "fair" that John can buy a radio or TV stations with the same ease that most of us buy the evening paper? I mean, the way Democrats describe "fairness"!

  • MikeAdamson

    Rob…thanks for your reply and I agree that liberal stations would do better if they offered something that the AM radio customer perceives as valuable. My opinion is that it's unfortunate that different points of view aren't as readily available but if enough listeners wanted it then the station owners would be quick to change I'm sure. Perhaps once the current audience is dead then the matter becomes academic since I don't know many kids that listen to any radio period.

    I think its good that the airwaves are owned by the public but a Fairness Doctrine doesn't jibe with my idea of free expression and I don't see it as a desirable instrument of public policy.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    wow.
    abysmal.
    fuck john kerry and fuck the fairness doctrine. of course he knows what's best. cunt. this shit makes me sick. how can anyone jock this kind of thing with a straight face? whoever votes for it should be deported.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Mike, I don't know if I'm a "kid" or not, but I listen to talk radio. And know a lot of other "kids" my age who do as well. So I don't think talk radio is going away any time soon. It may move to the internet, but it's not going away.

  • Mickey

    It takes John Kerry two hours to say something that Rush can opine in 30 seconds. The public doesn't mind a windbag on the air but they do need to be entertained. Democrats like Kerry are just plain dull.

  • Neiman

    The premise of this debate is wrong: The liberals have since shortly after WW-II controlled the majority of the news media in America and alternative avenues of communication like Hollywood. Today the three major News Networks (ABC, CBS, NBC), CNN, MSNBC and various outlets like HBO are liberal organisms, as are most of the newspapers and periodicals. FOX News is the only half-way conservative television news outlet; and despite the popularity of conservative talk radio, even radio itself via the entertainment channels are predominantly liberal in nature.

    So, if conservatives are ready to fight, the Fairness Doctrine can be used to force all these above mentioned avenues of liberal thought to give equal time to conservatives. Just think about a major movie with a liberal political theme being forced to give time in the movie or via another production to conservative beliefs; or a disk jockey having said something liberal giving a conservative equal time to counter that remark. It could be glorious!

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Proof said: Soooo! Are there any Democrats who believe that John Kerry should be the poster boy for fairness??? Is it "fair" that John can buy a radio or TV stations with the same ease that most of us buy the evening paper? I mean, the way Democrats describe "fairness"!

    I guess so. If John Kerry wants the lefts point of view to get out, let him buy his own station. So is the fairness doctrine going to require fair and equal time in news papers.

    People talk about Bush taking rights away and acting like the third reich, this is way more serious. This is the violation of free speech… More liberal whinning. This stuff should scare conservatives.

  • http://Array Bat One

    …whoever votes for it should be deported.

    Even if they are Hispanic?

  • docdave

    Now maybe that's because talk radio tends to be a medium more conservatives tend to listen to than liberals.

    And the conservatives can shape and discuss the news with clarity and without obscenities something with which the typical leftist has difficulty.

  • 2Hotel9

    goon, I have been asking any leftard to give an example of the Patriot Act being used against any American citizen NOT engaged in physical or financial support of terrorism. Ringing silence.

    OH! Wait! Whats that? Sounds like,,,,,,,,,crickets. Never mind.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Is it "fair" for reporters to keep asking for John Kerry's military records just because he said he'd release them?
    Is it "fair" for them to keep asking whose medals John actually threw over the White House fence? Or what the status of his actual discharge was?
    Is it "fair" for John not to be elected President just because he's a lying, hypocritical, patrician, out of touch gigolo? (and a Democrat!)

    Yeah! John Kerry needs a Fairness Doctrine!

  • WOOFX

    Happy now Hotel?

    U.S. Settles Suit Filed by Ore. Lawyer
    $2 Million Will Be Paid For Wrongful Arrest After Madrid Attack

    Brandon Mayfield

  • 2Hotel9

    He was, and still is, involved with known terrorist groups. And he is now associated with ACLU, another anti-American terrorist support group.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    2hotel9 said: goon, I have been asking any leftard to give an example of the Patriot Act being used against any American citizen NOT engaged in physical or financial support of terrorism. Ringing silence.

    I have noticed that if an idea happened on Bush's watch its a bad idea, however, the left still voted for the patriot act. Twice.

    I still to this day don't understand why someone would be concerned with the government scanning calls and if they hear a certain word or conversation or topic the Government will then inturn look further into the situation. I am not sure how resonable people would be concerned about this?

    However, the leftard leaning ALCU I guess feels that we are infringing on terrorists rights to blow stuff up. How dare the governement try to stop these islamafascist from perpetrating acts of violence against the american public.

    These are the same weinies that are so shook up about the poor jihadist down in gitmo… These are the same guys that would cut our heads off and not blink or think twice about it…

  • 2Hotel9

    Or are you going to pretend Senor Mayfield was not working for HAMAS in Europe? Oh, and why are we paying this? Federalis and INTERPOL arrested him, we just took custody.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Neiman said: FOX News is the only half-way conservative television news outlet; and despite the popularity of conservative talk radio, even radio itself via the entertainment channels are predominantly liberal in nature.

    And to the left tards like Hillary, Feinstien, Boxer, Chuckie Schummer, Ted Kennedy, Eddie the Blow hard Schultz et al think Fox News and right leaning talk radio is criminal and needs to be regulated because it has affects on elections, and because it makes people question the politicians in this country. I need to hear Why this needs to happen?

    All the left can say is we have to regulate it because Ed Schultz is as popular as he thinks.

  • WOOFX

    Mayfield had a technical legal
    loophole, innocence.

    FBI Investigated 3,501 People Without Warrants
    by Mark Sherman

    2006

    WASHINGTON – The FBI secretly sought information last year on 3,501 U.S. citizens and legal residents from their banks and credit card, telephone and Internet companies without a court's approval, the Justice Department said Friday.

    On and On

  • carrick

    Um… WOOF. Since when do you need a warrant to do a background check? NSLs, which is the mechanism used, have been around since the mid 1980s.

    Such f**king ignorance. Such f**king stupidity. Meet modern day liberalism.

  • ryan

    amazingly closed minds here. It seems that you all listen to and believe fox news. liberal radio is not at all in favor of the fairness doctrine but more important is…why so much hullabaloo from you all. righties make up 90% of talk radio and in the markets where liberal radio is being played, it is growing. so are you all afraid that is might take over that 90%??? are you scared Rush and Hannity might lose? i dont get why only righties are speaking of the fairness doctrine so much. if you listen to righties, the liberals are fighting for this. if you listen to liberals, they dont want it. so all of you are crying in the air about your fear of what exactly? you hae 90 percent of the radio now and liberal radio is only growing in the places that it is played and promoted. fearing competition? You are all so much smarter than the "libertards" anyway, so what would be wrong with liberal radio all over the dial? you know whats really going on anyway right? I really hope one of you rightwing nutjobs can anser these questions without turning coulter on me and just calling names.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Speaking of closed minds ryan.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    "closed minds" = does not agree with a liberal.

    Nice group of straw men ryan. Perhaps when you're done erecting those straw men, you'll notice that the discussion is about a big name Democrat calling for the return of the "Fairness Doctrine". The "rightwing nutjobs" as you call them are noticing that many Democrats are the ones who are "fearing competition".

    I really hope one of you rightwing nutjobs can anser these questions without turning coulter on me and just calling names.

    Priceless!

    Good troll ryan.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    liberal radio is only growing in the places that it is played and promoted

    Dank basements…like mold?

    so are you all afraid that is might take over that 90%

    Same fear that polka music will beat out rap and inner city youths will begin clog dancing!

    anser (sic) these questions

    Without turning Olbermann on you and assassinating your character?

    amazingly closed minds here

    Thanks for the description of your home town (or at least your Mom's basement)!

  • 2Hotel9

    "rightwingnutjobs"=95% of the population of America.

    ryan=closed minded moron. Making it a Democrat. Is any real human surprised?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development