John Edwards Would Garnish Your Wages If You Don’t Buy Health Care
Which isn’t all that different from raising your taxes for health care, really.
Under the Edwards plan, when Americans file their income taxes, they would be required to submit a letter from an insurance provider confirming coverage for themselves and their dependents.
If someone did not submit proof of coverage, the Internal Revenue Service would notify a newly established regional or state-based health-care agency (which Edwards has dubbed a Health Care Market).
Those regional agencies would then evaluate whether the uninsured individual was eligible for Medicare (which covers those over 65), Medicaid (which covers the indigent), or S-CHIP (the State Children’s Health Insurance Program which targets the working poor).
If the individual was not eligible for either of those existing public programs, the regional-health care agency would enroll the individual into the lowest cost health-care plan available in that area. The lowest-cost option could be a new Medicare-like public option or a private insurance plan.
The newly covered individual would not only have access to health benefits but would also be responsible for making monthly payments with the help of a tax credit.
The exact size of the financial obligation would vary according to a person’s income (lower-income Americans would receive larger tax credits).
If a person did not meet his or her monthly financial obligation for a set period of time (perhaps a year, perhaps longer) the Edwards plan would empower the federal government to garnish an individual’s wages for purposes of collecting “back premiums with interest and collection costs.”
The process, according to the Edwards campaign, would resemble the process used to collect money from Americans who are delinquent on federal student loans or child support payments.
Perhaps even scarier than modeling a mandatory health care system after the draconian child support enforcement regulations many of us have all come to know and love is the enforcement bureaucracy it would take to carry out Edwards’ wishes. He’s talking about an entirely new federal agency in every single state tasked with some sort of social workers who are empowered to actually take money out of your pay check if you don’t get health care.
That is an obnoxious expansion of government size and power, not to mention a terrible new burden for the taxpayers.
robert108
Neiman
Bernard Revollo
The Whistler
ellinas
Good Ol Boy
