Bat: I know there are no cause and effect relationships between any Bush economic policies and the recession. That is obvious to anyone who knows economics. The recession was caused by the Dems needing a wedge issue to elect their inexperienced and ignorant Marxist to the White House. Even the thirty year long market rigging by the Dem social engineers could have been fixed without anything more than reduced, but still positive, economic growth. Before the MSM and Obama started the relentless lying about the economy, we had a very slight slowdown; it accelerated when it became obvious that Obama’s election would occur, and the investors started bailing out of the market, in the fourth quarter of 2008, and the inauguration and announcement of the radical leftist economic approach became a reality, rather than a possibility, causing a real drop in investor confidence. As you know, without investment and re-investment, our economy just idles along, and the fear of the twin blows of wealth destruction and incurring of massive, unproductive debt(pork spending, to pay off his political allies) has been a disaster for the market and for the economy. Furthermore, Obama’s announcements of a renewal of the obstruction of domestic energy development(real energy, not windmills) has foreshadowed energy shortages in the near future, with the concomitant high energy costs for all Americans, except for the political class, of course.
The cause and effect relationships of the destructiveness of Obama’s economic policies are plain to see.

As we both know, lefties abhor facts and logic, and are unable to do cause and effect reasoning.

Still waiting for that list of Bush economic policies, complete with the necessary cause and effect reasoning, that were recessionary.

R108,

Don’t hold your breath, my friend. I called RBB’s bluff on some stupid claim he made about the long list of Clinton’s anti-terrorism accomplishments. That was over a year ago. Ever since I pointed out that Islamist terrorists averaged one attack against US targets and interests every 18 months during Bill Clinton’s watch, RBB’s vaunted list has vanished like a suicide bomber in an explosion.

Free lunchers are in denial about their responsibility for slowing down economic activity with their collectivist agenda.

Was this the change the Democrats were hoping for?

likwid: They can’t produce what doesn’t exist. There were no recessionary Bush economic policies.

Dumb little dinostem: What “conservative policies” do you claim caused this “mess”? Please furnish the chain of causation to prove your point. If you can’t do that, you are just spouting superstition.

No amount of denial on your part will change that fact.

And no amount of posting will keep your stupid, ignorant, lying mouth from blathering the same tired shit over, and over, and over again.

So whats the point.

Vanished like your memory.
I posted what you were looking for.
You chose to ignore it.

And no amount of posting will keep your stupid, ignorant, lying mouth from blathering the same tired shit over, and over, and over again.

I see you’re talking to your mirror again, “Buzz”. Just for fun, though, try for once to present any sort of valid counterargument to anything I write.
You remain bitter, hateful and fact-free.

Just for fun, though, try for once to present any sort of valid counterargument to anything I write.

no

This bush/gop recession is a doozy, ain’t it?

This bush/gop recession is a doozy, ain’t it?

Still waiting for that list of Bush economic policies, complete with the necessary cause and effect reasoning, that were recessionary. Anything, anything, little ribby?
Without a chain of causation, you’re just spouting superstition.

http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-jobs-lost-in-the-bush-and-obama-administration-2010-2