Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, April 28, 2008

Is The Left Turning On Reverend Wright?

First the left defended Wright as they felt they had to in order to defend Obama.  But now that Barack himself has given them the go-ahead to be offended at what Wright is saying, the Obama faithful are turning on their Messiah’s spiritual leader.

The blogging leftists are leading the charge:

Many of you will disagree with what I have to say, however it’s rapidly becoming clear that it’s now time for Senator Obama to sever whatever ties or perceptions of ties exist between himself and Jeremiah Wright.

Let me be clear, his controversial positions are damaging enough, but they are far from the worst of it.

Rev. Wright is trying to attach himself to Senator Obama: to fuse his cause, his fortunes, his solutions, and his grievances with those of Obama.

I suggest you re-read that last sentence, for it contains the death of our hopes for a progressive president within it.

The media leftists are following suit:

image

What’s interesting is that these folks aren’t far off the mark when it comes to Wright.  He is absolutely trying to fuse his cause to Obama’s, and as I theorized previously may even be trying to scuttle his entire campaign.  An Obama Presidency, which would mean that America isn’t nearly the oppressive racist state people like Wright claim it is, would be bad for the “civil rights” business of people like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Wright himself.

As Booker T. Washington once said:

There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.

Has the left finally stumbled on to the ugly truth about the modern civil rights movement?  And if they have, what does that portend for the general efforts of the liberal left to make all Americans a class of one sort of victim or another all of whom need to be serviced by an ever-growing class of government politicians and bureaucrats?

Comments

There is a class of Caucasian people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Caucasian race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Caucasian to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.

WOOF on April 28, 2008 at 10:00 pm

It doesn’t really work when you say it WOOF. There’s no comparison.

likwidshoe on April 29, 2008 at 02:11 am

WOOF.  What?  The class or group I see are liberals trying to use some type of ?
guilt? in some attempt to coerce unearned validation to a class of people who have not earned it.  What I am really offended by are liberal’s attempts at fabricating news and somehow getting “permission” from a member of this group before they get the courage to Tell The Truth!!


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 29, 2008 at 06:02 am

There is a class of Caucasian people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Caucasian race before the public.

In America...we call those people racists.

Wing Chun Geologist on April 29, 2008 at 07:22 am
Avatar for Hannitized

Did anyone here realize that the left moved as one unified body? 

It’s a good thing you were here to point that out.  Otherwise, I would have assumed that people are making decisions for themselves and making up their own minds as they see fit.  I’m weird.

Hannitized on April 29, 2008 at 08:25 am
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

That’s right, Hannitized!  Change the subject, quick!


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on April 29, 2008 at 08:31 am
Avatar for Hannitized

That’s right, Hannitized!  Change the subject, quick!

Why?  I was happy talking about your non issue about what some Dems are doing, er....all of them, I meant.

But if you want me to change the subject.  Ok.

HERE:

I don’t know what the big deal is, it’s not like our guy is flip flopping on the Iraq war.  Saying one day that we need to leave as soon as possible and that it is ok to do so, and then the next saying if we leave, there will be chaos.  That would be disingenuous.  Or, it would be a demonstration of somebody who can’t be consistent about something so serious.

Hannitized on April 29, 2008 at 08:40 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.