Is Harry Reid Lying To Us About Iraq?
Or does he just not know what is actually going on in that country?
Here’s an excerpt from a press release Reid issued on Monday:
The President’s troop escalation is now complete, yet a New York Times article this morning reports that security goals are far, far short of the military’s hopes, with just one-third of Baghdad neighborhoods in some semblance of order.
You gotta love how Reid declares it “the President’s troop escalation,” as though he himself didn’t vote in favor of appointing General Petraeus, the architect of the surge strategy, to run operations in Iraq.
But petty, misleading partisan sniping aside, General Petraeus himself points out that Reid is wrong. The troop surge isn’t complete yet:
Petraeus: I think it’s important to remember that we’re still a week and a half, two weeks away from having all of the surge forces even on the ground for the first time.
CNN: General, just to be clear, you do not have all of your troops on the ground in country in Baghdad yet?
Petraeus: That is correct. The fifth of the five surge brigades and the Marine Expeditionary Unit and the combat aviation brigade are still positioning themselves in Iraq as we speak, or moving up from Kuwait. And again, they’ll all be in position and actually in operations in less than two weeks.
Harry Reid and the rest of his Democrat cohorts have been doing nothing but calling the troop surge in Iraq a failure for the last month or so now, yet the simple truth is that the troop surge has not yet been fully implemented yet. What kind of irresponsible jerks call their own nation’s military strategy a failure before it’s even been fully implemented?
The answer is: Ambitious Democrat jerks who care more about tarnishing the reputations of their political enemies than sound foreign policy. Who care about winning elections more than winning wars.



