Is Kent Conrad Going To Let Jack Dalrymple Appoint A Republican Replacement?

Update: Apparently Senator Kent Conrad told the Fargo Forum this morning that the OMB appointment was a “no.”

There have been rumors for weeks now that Senator Kent Conrad is being considered by the Obama administration for position at OMB vacated by Jack Lew who, in turn, replaced Bill Daley as Chief of Staff. I dismissed the rumors at the time because it wasn’t the first time Conrad was rumored for such a gig, and the idea of Conrad accepting seemed far-fetched.

But now there smoke is getting a little thicker, and it makes me think there may be some fire. Accordind to the Hill, Conrad’s office is clamming up when asked about the OMB gig:

Retiring Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) refused to comment when asked by his hometown newspaper whether he would be a candidate to take over the Office of Management and Budget.

Jack Lew, the current OMB director, is taking over as White House chief of staff following the retirement of William Daley earlier this month. Conrad plans to retire from the Senate at the end of the year after 26 years in the chamber.

The North Dakota senator’s name has been floated as a potential replacement atop the OMB.

This is interesting because, if Conrad steps down to work for the Obama administration, that means Governor Jack Dalrymple gets to appoint his replacement to serve from the point of vacancy until the next regularly scheduled general election.

With Conrad gone, Dalrymple could appoint Rick Berg (it’s safe to assume that would be his pick) who would then campaign against Heidi Heitkamp with the advantage of already being in office. Heitkamp, already a long shot to win, would face an even steeper climb to victory.

Berg’s vacancy in the House would then, I’m pretty sure, remain vacant until the election seeing as how the Constitution requires all House vacancies be filled by election and the vacancy would have occurred in the second year of Berg’s term.

This would be a big, big blow to Democrats if it happened (still a long shot, I think) but I wouldn’t put it past Conrad. His interests in North Dakota are minimal – his only tie to the state is a small, vacant apartment in Bismarck he maintains for official citizenship requirements – and he’s got an enormous ego that would no doubt be served well by service in his close friend Barack Obama’s administration. Plus, his colleague former Senator Byron Dorgan had no qualms about hanging the state party out to dry with a hasty retirement announcement made just before the 2010 cycle which left Democrats pitting cream puff candidate Tracy Potter up against Senator Hoeven.

Potter ultimately got less than 30% of the vote.

Tags: , , , , ,


«
»
  • Pontoonin

    Sounds good to me.  Conrads freaky dog cuddling/grooming habits should’nt be allowed back in ND.

  • Anonymous

    That would mess up the Republican plan.  They would have to appoint someone other than Rick Berg and by doing so give Heidi a better chance in the fall. 

    • Rick Olson

      Not necessarily.  Rick Berg would run as planned, only he would have a few months of incumbency under his belt. 

      • Anonymous

        The democrats are already criticizing Berg for not being a career politician, they think he should spend more time in the House.  I just think it would create a messy situation.  If Berg is appointed half way through his first term it would provide convenient mis-information for the opposing side.  Conrad may be setting up the adds for the fall.  If someone like Drew Wrigley was appointed it would give the seat to the Republicans and give him some valuable name recognition without offending the conservatives who support Sand.  I think every effort should be made to let the convention/primary system work, while assuring a victory in the fall.  But that’s just my opinion, I could be wrong. 

    • http://sayanythingblog.com Rob

      No, Berg would run as the appointed incumbent.

  • Camsaure

    Conrat would fit in well with all the other crooks and criminals in the obuma administration. He is corrupt, that is most likely why obuma would consider him.

  • Rick Olson

    Well, I’m pretty sure this was addressed last when Senator Quentin Burdick died.  North Dakota law allows the governor to appoint someone to temporarily fill a vacancy in the U.S. Senate.  However, that appointment lasts only until a special election can be held.  The special election must be held within 90 days of the seat becoming vacant.

    What happened was when Burdick died, it was just barely more than 90 days before the general election that year was to be held.  Then-Gov. George Sinner wanted to schedule the special election for the same day as the general election, but he was overruled on that point.  Therefore, North Dakota had two U.S. Senate elections that year.  The general election which elected then-U.S. Congressman Byron Dorgan to the U.S. Senate and Earl Pomeroy to the U.S. House.  In the special election that took place about five weeks later, Kent Conrad was elected to fill the remainder of Burdick’s term.  Conrad thus became North Dakota’s “senior” senator.   

    As far as a U.S. House vacancy goes, those must always be filled by special election.  This is in accordance with the U.S. Constitution  The governor cannot make a temporary appointment. 

    For either a House or a Senate vacancy, the special election must be held within 90 days of the seat becoming vacant.  However, if the vacancy occurs less than 90 days prior to a statewide election (not sure if that means either a primary or general election, or just a general election); then the vacancy may be filled at the same time as said election takes place. 

  • Rick Olson

    OOPS…accidentally double-posted. The site has been unstable lately. Sorry.

  • Wesley Fargo

    Repeal the 17th amendment, and make the state legislator appoint the Senate just like the Constitution had it in mind when first ratified.  This makes the Senate directly beholden to the State Legislature rather than some Populist dream that the citizen has some control on a Federal office holder. 

     The House and its short 2 year terms make the House member much more closely tied to his last election rather than the 6 years of a Senator.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RVIS42ZJEXB6TWZQHYCZF247II Willis Forster

      Potter got 30% of the vote? That is very high % of mental defectives.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VWGHLJJMXZPFFVQJ5PSXHYKVWM genghis_jim

    Conrad? Berg? is there really a difference?

  • Ralph

    Conrad says  the OMB appointment is “not going to happen.”

    http://ndpolitics.areavoices.com/?p=92713

  • I H8 GOPers

    Why would you think a Dalrymple appointment would be a Republican? Are you unfamiliar with ND politics?

    • Rick Olson

      While it would not be required that Dalrymple would appoint a Republican; don’t you think he would give the nod to a fellow GOP’er?

      The only requirement is that the appointee is qualified to be a Senator in accordance with the qualifications as outlined in Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States: 1) each senator must be at least 30 years old, 2) must have been a citizen of the United States for at least the past nine years, and 3) must be (at the time of the election) an inhabitant of the state he or she seeks to represent. The age and citizenship qualifications for senators are more stringent than those for representatives. James Madison justified this arrangement by arguing that the “senatorial trust” called for a “greater extent of information and stability of character.”

  • Sky Rider

    Rob, I can’t believe you missed this one; Conrad as the head of the OMB, ya that makes sense. He’s done such a great job as head of the Dem Senate Budget Committee. : ) 

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development