Insurance Compaines: Democrat Health Care “Reform” Will Ruin Private Sector Insurance

And of course it will. As far as the liberals are concerned that’s a feature of their plans. That’s why Obama is giddy about plunging stock prices for insurance companies.

Colorado insurance executives, cautious supporters of health care reform throughout the past year, are now warning that current proposals could cause a “system collapse.”
At issue are what insurance companies consider absurdly low penalties for people who choose not to buy health insurance.
Their concern: People will buy insurance only when they desperately need it, such as after they’re diagnosed with cancer or heart disease.
Healthy people might choose to pay the penalty, now proposed at a few hundred dollars per year, because it is far less expensive than buying insurance.
Insurance companies, under that scenario, would end up spending more to treat patients than they would receive in premiums. Rates would rise even faster than they do now.

The whole point of their health care reform isn’t to empower Americans with more choice on health care. It’s to lock as many people as possible into government health care. That’s the goal. And they can’t do it with just an outright nationalization of the health care system. They don’t have the political support for that. So they’re going about it obliquely. Under the guise of creating some sort of government-backed “option” in the health care markets, ostensibly to give Americans more choice on health care, they’ll also create a tax and regulatory environment that makes it all but impossible for private insurers to continue to operate.
They may not draw that noose tight immediately, but once the government-backed option is in place there will be a forced march of Americans onto that “option” at the head of crack downs on private insurance.
The goal here is government dependence. Destroying the private health insurance industry is a means to that end.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array symphx

    dino do you have a job or are you just looking for government dole. can you name one thing the government has ever improved on or lowered the cost on? do you believe government run schools are good? do you believe in the government investing your money (social security-bankrupt) government controls medicine already and fails (medicaid, medicare), do your really think a bureaucrat runs a business better than someone whose livelihood actually depends on it? ps the government forced bad loans, they demanded it so “poor” could get loans too.

  • robert108

    Obama’s goal is “single payer”, and that means no choice and no competition.
    It’s the same old central planning that has failed every time it has been tried.

  • robert108

    Thanks for sharing your delusions with us, dino.

  • sayanything-4416

    Really? The private universities would be surprised to hear that.

    Simply parroting the right wing mantra “they want to increase dependency on government” doesn’t make it true. Sure, it fires up the stems (most of whom are dependent on government in many ways) but it’s simply just another lie.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    If the point isn’t government dependency, then why not focus on increasing the choice and flexibility of the health care/health insurance markets instead of foisting more government and regulations and taxes on everyone?

  • sayanything-4416

    Poor things! They’re so fragile they can’t have any competition.

    Wait until the democrats repeal their exemption from anti-trust laws. Then we’ll have them by the throat. That’s coming up soon.

    Then again, it will be the competitive market you people say will fix everything.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Thank you for acknowledging that we do not currently have choice in health care.

    Where you’re wrong is the idea that choice won’t drive down prices. It will, of course, just like competition drives down prices in all markets.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    It’s not competition, Dino. There’s no competing with the government.

    The government makes the rules. The government makes the laws. And the intent here is to make people dependent on the government, and they’re going to do that by regulating and taxing private insurance options out of the market.

  • sayanything-4416

    It’s the insurance companies who want the state monopolies.

    Choice won’t drop the cost or stop the 14-17% yearly increases.

    After all, the free, unregulated market did such wonders for the housing sector. More free market cult talk.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development