Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Instructions For A Do-It-Yourself Abortion

Blogger Molly Blythe, angry over the move to ban abortions in South Dakota, has posted a set of instructions for aborting an unborn child at home.

Its pretty graphic, and probably the best argument I've ever heard of for banning this monstrous practice. Here's an excerpt:

The first step is to break the membrane holding the fetus inside. You can feel around with the forceps for it. To get an idea of what each part looks like -- and to see the texture so that you understand better how it will feel -- I recommend looking at books with photographs of first trimester fetuses (personal recommendation for its astonishing photographs: A Child is Born), The membrane should be easily broken with the forceps. Depending on how far along the pregnancy is, varying quantities of clear or pinkish fluid may come from the vagina. As you grasp the sac with your forceps, twist it away so that it detaches. You will now need to remove small pieces of fetal material and membrane from the uterus with the forceps. Some of these pieces will be distinctly identifiable as fetal material. Save the material until the end of the procedure on a piece of plastic, so that you can be sure the entire fetus has been removed. If doing this sounds too ethically challenging, remember that fetuses do not have the capacity to feel actual pain until the third trimester. You are not "hurting" it, and it has no awareness, nor the capacity for awareness, that you are extracting it.

This portion of the abortion procedure should not be particularly painful for the patient.

While you are removing fetal material, you will also be removing pieces of placenta. However, because the placenta is attached to the uterine wall -- and because it is the blood source for the baby -- bleeding may begin at this time. It is imperative that if bleeding begins at this point in the procedure, you do NOT stop. Stopping the procedure and attempting to stanch the bleeding will not work. The bleeding will stop on its own once the placenta is totally removed from the uterus. It may be scary, but keep going.

Once you have removed most of the material that is removable, you must move on to curettage. By now you will have felt the walls of the uterus with the forceps, and you must move on to using the spoon-shaped curettes. Find the spot on the uterine wall where placenta still clings -- the curette will make a sound much like metal on metal on a clean uterine wall, but will not make the same scraping sound on a place that still needs material removed. Scrape from the uterine walls, scraping material toward the cervix. Use the same general form of stroke you would use to scoop ice cream, and don't be afraid to scrape fairly hard. Scraping softly could leave tissue behind, and if there's anything you don't want, it's that. The other cue that will inform you the uterus is clean is that the patient will generally report feeling a cramp when the clean uterus is scraped, whereas a scrape of placenta will not feel as painful. Listen to your patient and listen to your curettes.

Once the material is removed from the uterine wall, any excess bleeding will generally slow or stop and it's uterine forceps time again. Take the remaining material out with the forceps. Most pieces of fetal material will come out with a simple tug on the forceps (again, don't be too afraid to use force and put a bit of muscle into it). However, at 13-14 weeks the fetal head may be slightly big to bring out. Pinch it with the forceps and take it out in pieces, as well. Make absolutely sure all bone fragments are removed from the uterus, as well as all other material. If necessary, use the curette again to remove remaining material and repeat the procedure with forceps.


Not disgusted enough yet? Since Molly encourages her readers to look at pictures of a first trimester fetus before starting so they'll know what they're dealing with I thought I'd include just such a picture of a fetus at twelve weeks. You know, so we can get a look at the "material" you'll be scooping out of some woman's uterus.

2AC85BEA-E863-4DFA-807D-661CD78D7243.jpg


Don't worry. That's not really a person or anything. Just a clump of cells your patient will be better off without once you cut it up and scoop it out of her uterus like so much ice cream.

Be sure to tune in next week when Molly will teach us all how to suck babies out of the womb with a vacuum.

(via Pundit Guy)

Comments

Avatar for Dave

I’m glad someone is taking the responsibility to prevent deaths related to the abortion ban. I think this shows again that liberals’ fears of hanger-aided back-alley abortions are misguided.

Dave on March 15, 2006 at 06:48 pm
Rob
Rob
18086 comments
Send a private message

I’m willing to bet that if abortion gets banned the number of children saved from being scooped out of a uterus will far out number the women so desperate to shirk the responsibility the brought on themselves that they resort to "back alley" abortions and die from them.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on March 15, 2006 at 06:50 pm
Avatar for Dave

It’s possible. I’m reasonably sure most women have already planned how many children they want in their family; banning abortion will just make it more difficult to plan. I don’t think ending abortion will lead to a substantially higher number of babies being born.

Dave on March 15, 2006 at 06:54 pm
Rob
Rob
18086 comments
Send a private message

I’m hoping it will lead to a higher number of people being responsible with their genitals.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on March 15, 2006 at 07:07 pm
Avatar for WOOF

Genitals are more responsible for people than people are for genitals.

WOOF on March 15, 2006 at 08:25 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

You gotta love the comments following that murder manual that assert that banning abortion is going back to "the dark ages". Funny, I thought that abortion was a part of our "dark ages".

likwidshoe on March 16, 2006 at 03:22 am
Avatar for Zsa Zsa

likwidshoe...I hope someday people will see what abortion is. With all the advances in technology. I hope these will be considered the dark ages. Maybe in the ages to come people will see the light???

Zsa Zsa on March 16, 2006 at 04:06 am
Avatar for likwidshoe

likwidshoe...I hope someday people will see what abortion is.

Don’t hope for the impossible. Abortion advocates know what abortion is, they just chose to ignore it so their minds can easier rest on their killing-for-convenience arguments.

likwidshoe on March 16, 2006 at 04:10 am
Avatar for patrick

If I use precise surgical instruments to end a life, do I get off easier than if I stomped him to death?

patrick on March 16, 2006 at 04:16 am
Avatar for Zsa Zsa

Patrick...It sure seems that way.

Zsa Zsa on March 16, 2006 at 04:19 am
Avatar for Zsa Zsa

likwidshoe...These days saying abortion is not killing a human being, is kind of like saying smoking ciggs. doesn’t contribute to lung cancer!

Zsa Zsa on March 16, 2006 at 05:08 am
Avatar for Tom_with_a_Dream

Dave’s Fruedian Slip -

banning abortion will just make it more difficult to plan

So abortion is being used a method of birth control.  Ok, good to know.  Thanks.

When my wife want to engage in irresponsible genital behavior (after having reached our pre-determined 2.3 children), we check the calendar, procure a barrier, or simply practice some self-control to "plan" to not exceed our self-imposed Child Allowance.  It never occured to us that we could just throw caution to the wind and buy a pair of forceps…

Tom_with_a_Dream on March 16, 2006 at 05:30 am
Avatar for Dave

Tom With A Dream wrote: 

So abortion is being used a method of birth control.

Of course. Are you retarded or something? A monkey understands that concept.

Dave on March 16, 2006 at 08:45 am
Avatar for Tom_with_a_Dream

Then why do the monkeys at Planned Parenthood (WHOA!!!  Hey there...) deny it.  Of course it is being used as BC, obviously.  My point was that the Left (probably not the entire Left, admittedly) refuses to call it what it is…

 

Tom_with_a_Dream on March 16, 2006 at 10:34 am
Avatar for modern instances

Glad she posted it.  Shows why abortions need to be performed in a medical setting.

modern instances on March 16, 2006 at 04:52 pm
Avatar for Tom_with_a_Dream

Doesn’t it show why abortions should not be performed in any setting?

 Some of these pieces will be distinctly identifiable as fetal material.

"Fetal material" ??  You mean like arms and legs, with little fingers and toes and all that other "material"?

Tom_with_a_Dream on March 17, 2006 at 03:35 am
Avatar for modern instances

Doesn’t it show why abortions should not be performed in any setting?

No.  Abortions are going to happen either way, should be in performed in a sterile environment by a trained professional.

modern instances on March 17, 2006 at 03:47 am
Avatar for likwidshoe

No.  Abortions are going to happen either way, should be in performed in a sterile environment by a trained professional.

What kind of argument is this? "Since it is going to happen anyways, we should just sanction/endorse it."

Murder and thievery is going to happen either way as well. What do you suggest we do?

likwidshoe on March 17, 2006 at 03:52 am
Avatar for Tom_with_a_Dream

Thanks Lik.  I hate putz’s…

Tom_with_a_Dream on March 17, 2006 at 04:17 am
Avatar for modern instances

The difference with theft and murder is that another individual’s rights are being imposed upon.  An embryo or fetus is not an independent entity.  If a woman is going to have an abortion, better in a professional setting than trying to do it themselves.

modern instances on March 17, 2006 at 05:28 am
Avatar for likwidshoe

The difference with theft and murder is that another individual’s rights are being imposed upon.

And this differs from abortion how exactly? But that is beside the point in this instance. Your stance that abortion is going to happen anyway, so let’s just make it legal doesn’t make sense when applied to other things such as murder and thievery. Instead of conceding that your point is nonsensical, you change the subject into one of rights.

An embryo or fetus is not an independent entity.

Neither is a two year old in many respects. Neither is someone hooked up to a breathing machine.

If a woman is going to have an abortion, better in a professional setting than trying to do it themselves.

You’re repeating yourself.

likwidshoe on March 17, 2006 at 05:40 am
Avatar for Zsa Zsa

MI...IF, it is not an independent entity, what is an embryo or fetus? it is a life different from the mother; it has its own, separate genetic code. You were once an embryo, are you your mother? Your response only shows that you are defiant and brazen in your defense of abortion. Which in defense for your belief is good! BUT, your comparison of theft and murder as any type of defense: you might want to consider correcting that if you want to be taken seriously?

Zsa Zsa on March 17, 2006 at 06:50 am
Avatar for Dave

what is an embryo or fetus?

An embryo or a fetus.

Dave on March 17, 2006 at 10:36 am
Avatar for girlnextdoor

Okay. Considering the fact that I’m only 15 you guys probably don’t care what I think, but I’m going to say it anyway.

I must say… Modern… have you ever read the book “If you give a mouse a cookie...”? Because you should. If we give them abortion “because it will happen anyway” they are going to want more and more until everything that is immoral and wrong is legal “because it will happen anyway”.

Even in cases of rape you can’t justify it. People are all “Well that girl didn’t do anything wrong so why should she have to pay for it?” Agreed. BUT… did the baby do anything wrong?? Should the baby have to pay for it?? The answer to both is no. The least she can do is adoption.

Now I realize the last post for this was in March and it is now June.. But if any of you read this… respond so I know you are paying attentionsmile

girlnextdoor on June 11, 2006 at 09:44 pm
Avatar for TemLo

there’s no baby involved, only a fetus or embryo.

adoption isn’t the answer to everything. do you really think the child will be happy, or even want to live for that matter, knowing it is unwanted, and surrounded by other unwanted children in some ricketty building? i’m sure the mother wouldn’t like knowing she has a child somewhere out there in the world, not knowing if it’s even alive or being taken care of.

also, people tend to forget that it takes sperm to impregnate. abortion isn’t the women’s decision alone.

TemLo on August 23, 2006 at 03:50 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.