If A Sex Offender Is So Dangerous His Moving Into A Community Prompts Public Meetings…

  •  May 31, 2008

…why don’t we just keep him in prison?
It boggles my mind that people who are such a danger to society that they must be the subject of public meetings and constant monitoring by law enforcement are let out of prison even as we step enforcement measures on things like drug use.
We need to review our priorities. Speaking for myself, I’d rather have a crack addict living down the street than a rapist or pedophile.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Neiman

    2hotel9: Neither jpe or I are in any way, shape, manner or form supporting child molestors. We both simply pointed out that the Law must be followed and if it is not tough enough now, then reinforce these laws. Your accusing both jpe and I of supporting child molestors, just by mentioning the law, is or should be beneath you.

  • Bat One

    jpe,

    I believe Rob’s point was to keep him in prison in the first place. To send him back to prison would require another crime, another trial, another guilty verdict, and of course, another victim.

  • jpe

    I got it Bat, but the state can’t just extend the sentence if the guy’s already serving the max. So, the state gets around that by punishing via restrictions on where the guy can live.

    It’s the ex post facto nature of that that bugs me. I’d be fine w/ child molesters getting a needle in the arm, as long as its pursuant to a duly passed law.

  • Jeugenen

    TO REWARD THESE MENTAL MONSTROSITIES WITH FREE ROOM AND BOARD, MEDICAL CARE, AND ENTERTAINMENT?

  • jpe

    So you are happy to allow child molesters to leave jail and continue molesting children.

    I’m just pointing out that Constitution bars increasing punishment after-the-fact. Ergo, people come up with these residency restrictions to de facto exile ex-cons.

    So Rob asks: why can’t we just put ‘em back in jail? The answer is that the Constitution forbids it.

  • jpe

    It’d be an ex post facto punishment (and hence unconstitutional) to send him back to prison. So we just exile people. How courts find that those restrictions aren’t punishment is beyond me, but whatever.

  • 2Hotel9

    Why was his child molesting ass not executed?!?!????

  • 2Hotel9

    So the “LAW” trumps stopping child molesters? The “LAW” is more important protecting children from predators? The “LAW” has clearly failed, it is putting molesters back in the streets where the have free reign to molest and kill children at will. And your only concern is to protect the “LAW”. Not children.

  • Fred

    A bullet is cheaper than prison. And also the 3 things you mentioned are not mutually exclusive.

  • Neiman

    So you are happy to allow child molesters to leave jail and continue molesting children.

    Just because someome is interested in the law being applied as written and fairly, does not mean he likes child molestors or rapists. If we want child molestors to get a life sentence, then let’s change the law and keep them incarcerated for life. If we want to apply the death penalty in cases where the perpetrator is to be executed for child molestation, then change the law. But, be prepared for thousands of them being executed every year. Plus, are we going to include those found guilty of statutory rape of a minor, because the man marries his 16 year old girl friend, and execute him? I am not arguing for or against these more severe penalties, only pointing out that we as a people need to be clear about such crimes, to make the law accurately reflect those desires and apply the law equally and fairly to all of them.

    EWS48:

    perhaps we could have a parade through town holding a banner and cheering that, “The Pedophile is Dead!” “That might ease her pain a little.”

    I certainly do not want to be viewed as in any shape, manner or form supporting or defending child molestors; but I must ask you, is it the job of the law to make the victim and relatives feel better, to ease their pain? Then, if that is your goal, hell why not let the family choose the punishment, castration, public stoning, use them as targets or whatever will ease their pain? I just didn’t understand that the law was about easing pain and making people feel better.

    The emotional reaction to child molestors is understandable, but surely law should not be based on our emotions, but on some higher, more objective standard.

    I know some idiot here, just because I asked some questions, will accuse me of defending child molestation and molestors – if so, you are absoluetly wrong.

  • ews48

    A city councilwoman stopped by last week. She was fuming because a local 61 year old man had just died and the local paper announced his death while mentioning that he was a pedophile and couldn’t just let the man die in peace.

    She asked me what I thought and I said that since the 16 year old girl that he raped 20 years ago is still undoubtedly suffering, perhaps we could have a parade through town holding a banner and cheering that, “The Pedophile is Dead!” “That might ease her pain a little.” “Maybe she will even join us.” “I can get some news trucks down here for that.” “Maybe the whole country will celebrate.”

    “You’re heartless”, she said. “No. He was heartless”, I said.

  • 2Hotel9

    So, you support allowing child molesters to leave jail and continue to molest children. You keep telling us that you support and defend the right of molesters to continue molesting.

    Nman? How much liquor have you swilled today? Since clearly your support of child molesters is alcohol induced.

  • 2Hotel9

    So you are happy to allow child molesters to leave jail and continue molesting children.Perhapsw you should volunteer to have them live next door to you and your children.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development