Me thinks the latter.

Aren’t you the fool who posted right here on SAB that you knowingly had sex with 2 diseased whores and then self medicated for chlamydia?

So much for your thinking abilities.

All of your irrelevant banter aside, it does not explain how if obama had your job, or mine, it would qualify him more for his current role.

Your job, little Wanker?? Then at least America could have fries with its unemployment! Heh.

Rodney Graves would be a much better president than the unqualified marxist muslim idiot now occupying the position.

WH4F,

If nominated I will not run, if elected I will not serve.

Heh!

eunuchized the beardless catamite of the “freudian projections“, racist apologia, and severe reluctance bordering on inability to admit error is back on the inability to admit error track.

He demanded to know:

How does you having a job, qualify you for president?

When I said no such thing. Rather, I said:

Problem being that Obama never really had a job before being elected President of the United States.

That’s not “irrelevant banter,” it’s eunuchized demonstrating yet again both his inability to read with comprehension and his severe reluctance bordering on an inability to admit error.

As I said in my last response to this idiot:

It surprises no one here that eunuchized doesn’t understand why the demonstrated self discipline of holding a job for a prolonged period of time would be considered a plus by a prospective employer, and would in fact have to be explained to him (like so much else).

What a fucking moron is eunuchized!

Eunuchized demands to know:

How does you having a job, qualify you for president?

When what I wrote was:

Problem being that Obama never really had a job before being elected President of the United States.

1. Next time, get a better reader who can explain the difficult concepts for you, eunuchized.

2. It surprises no one here that eunuchized doesn’t understand why the demonstrated self discipline of holding a job for a prolonged period of time would be considered a plus by a prospective employer, and would in fact have to be explained to him (like so much else).

eunuchized the beardless catamite of the “freudian projections“, racist apologia, and severe reluctance bordering on inability to admit error you ignorant fool: The President of the United States works for the People of the United States. The Presidential Election Process is a prolonged job interview.

You’re a troll, and an ignorant one at that.

You’re not here for debate, and have earned only heaping derision.

One word for you, “interns.”

Who said serving in the military was the only way to prove your mettle?

Obama did nothing in his career except vote present in the Illinois State Senate.

I wasn’t aware that Rodney had pretensions on the White House.

I don’t know what kind of job Rodney held aside from he must have served in the Navy as an officer

That makes him immeasurably more qualified than Obama.

Eligible and qualified are quite different words with quite different meanings, hence the reason behind having two distinct terms.

A distinction without a difference since the current holder of the office is patently un-qualified, and the Constitution has no stipulations that anyone’s “Job” or for that mater experience of any kind render him, her, or it, fit to hold the position.

The question and the Poser, were irrelevant.

Da Wiz,

Please explain your argument.

How does you having a job, qualify you for president?

You have not adequately explained your remark, and it remains irrelevant.

Actually, if Obama had actually managed some sort of business or had some managerial training if might suggest that he would be more qualified to take the reins of the most complex enterprise on the planet, the US government.

Likewise, if he had any training or experience being judged by a P&L, it might suggest that he actually knows something about business, economic growth and job creation, or the effects that his witless, misguided, counter-intuitive fiscal policies will have on the nation’s economy.

Of course it would also help he wasn’t such a glib liar. But then this thread is about his convoluted “economic system” not his lack of integrity.

BatOne is the only one who had the correct answer to the poorly stated qualification Da Wiz offered and was subsequently challenged to answer.

Executive management is possibly relevant as it relates to managing money and making sound economic decisions that keep a businesses afloat or forging ahead as industry leaders in innovation.

Da Wiz, instead offers:

As I said in my last response to this idiot:

It surprises no one here that eunuchized doesn’t understand why the demonstrated self discipline of holding a job for a prolonged period of time would be considered a plus by a prospective employer, and would in fact have to be explained to him (like so much else).

Which is only relevant to people seeking employment, not the presidency.

Even BatOne’s response is not reason enough to disqualify a person from running for office, although it does give some a reasonable cause to have more faith and trust in a presidents decisions.