How Far Would You Go To Protect Your Home And Family? A WW2 Soldier Has A Very Clear Answer

You may talk o’ gin and beer
When you’re quartered safe out here
….
- Rudyard Kipling from Gunga Din
In the wake of the decision by Attorney General Eric Holder to seek an investigation into the methods used by CIA interrogators who, after 9-11, interviewed the people who were thought suspect or connected to the killing of over 3,000 Americans, I thought I would present a bit of perspective from someone who once wrestled (briefly) with their conscience over the very same thing.
And, I have to ask, while you’re quartered safe with home and civilization and safety, just how far would you go to protect your family and your descendants?
We’ve done this before, fighting with a bitter enemy who wanted only our complete destruction or subjugation, and we rightfully questioned our own judgment when it ended with a mushroom cloud over Japan. I’d like to present one soldier’s view of just how he felt in 1945 after he’d heard the bomb had been dropped on Hiroshima.
The late George MacDonald Fraser, author of the brilliant – and brilliantly fun – Flashman novels wasn’t just an historical comedy writer. He’d also been a British soldier in the incredibly ugly and brutal jungle war in Burma, fighting a determined and fatalistic enemy embodied in the Japanese Army.
Fraser, in his autobiography Quartered Safe Out Here tells us just how he felt when he’d heard the bomb had been dropped and what destruction it had brought:

The dropping of the bomb was a hideous thing, and I do not wonder that some of those who bore a part in it have been haunted by it all their lives. If it was not barbaric, then the word has no meaning……
……Could I say, yes, Grandarse or Nick or Forster were expendable, and should have died rather than the victims of Hiroshima? No, never. And that goes for every Indian, American, Australian, African, Chinese, and other soldier whose life was on the line in August, 1945. So drop the bomb.

And then he gets much more personal when he discusses his chances of surviving (about 4 to 1 for British soldiers in Burma) had the bomb not been dropped:

But I might have been that one, in which case my three children and six grandchildren would never have been born. And that, I’m afraid, is where all discussion of pros and cons evaporates and becomes meaningless, because for those nine lives I would pull the plug on the whole Japanese nation and never even blink. And so, I dare suggest, would you. And if you wouldn’t, you may be nearer to the divine than I am but you sure as hell aren’t fit to be parents or grandparents.

Harsh? Maybe. Or maybe Fraser had a more realistic view of what it could have been had drastic measures not been taken against an implacable enemy.
So – before any of us, liberal, conservative, left or right, sit in the comfort of our safe quarters and hurrumphs in judgment over the men and women who questioned the Al-Qaeda people as they were captured after 9-11, and questions their methods and motivations, I say we ask ourselves this:
How far would I go? Where would I stop if I knew I had someone in my hands was willing and able to kill my family, my friends, and my countrymen and I could stop them if I could get answers from them?
If you can honestly say that you’d back off for the sake of political expediency or correctness then, in the words of George MacDonald Fraser, you are certainly closer to the divine than I am. Or, just maybe, closer to something else on the other end of the scale.
Prosecuting the men and women of the CIA for protecting their homes and country is wrong on so many levels that I simply can’t list them all. But, it’s easy, isn’t it, to sit in judgment from the comforts of home, family, and office?
It’s easy for D.C. poltiticians to pronounce judgement when they’re quartered safe – right here.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array sayanything-4625

    Ah the ole “making things less safe for our soldiers”!

    Let me point out. We didn’t torture the Japanese, they beheaded and tortured us. We didn’t torture the Nazi’s, shot and tortured us. We didn’t torture the NK’s or Chinese they tortured us. We tortured some VC and NVA, they shot and tortured us. We didn’t torture the Somalians, they tortured us desecrated bodies and shot prisoners. Al Queda kidnaps, captures, tortures and beheads us. We interrogate people by not letting them sleep and pretending to drown them using a method we use on our own people. Not exactly torture. Here’s what they do.

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0524072torture1.html

    That’s torture. Listen up kids. As a soldier it was made very plain to me, don’t give up because if you get captured its usually your ass. Unlike other people we have fought, America may play hard ball to get some information out of you but when your information becomes worthless we don’t interrogate you for shits and giggles. The Japanese, NK’s and NVA would systematically beat you for fun. That’s torture Gentleman. I don’t see us beating up Abdul the goat herder on a regular basis. He has no real information we can use. I don’t have any real qualms with us waterboarding a man that can behead someone with a knife. It took a long time for Daniel Pearl to die. If we can get information out of him that saves one life it was worth it.

  • Pilgrim

    You’re not answering the question, Woof.

    How far would you go?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    I worked for WorldCom, but left because it was corrupt from top down. I earned the nick name “Mr. Integrity”

    Either WorldCom was a lot worse than I thought, or Wankertized’s co-workers were familiar with the concept of “irony”.

  • HG

    Almost every day brings a new offense from this administration.

  • sayanything-4625

    Thousands of innocents were tortured.

    They Sow the Wind, and Reap the Whirlwind.

    Thousands of innocents?

  • Pilgrim

    Randy G:

    Thanks. High praise indeed.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    You talk about Obama as if he hailed from Chicago, but he was raised in Hawaii by a very kind and intelligent family that originated from kansas.

    And Tony Rezko and William Ayers and all those Chicago politicians where he became a community organizer told him that if he clicked his ruby slippers together (or Michelle’s $600 sneaks) and said “There’s no place like home” three times, then Auntie Em would come and vote for him a dozen times in the names of dead people, cartoon characters and the starting line of the Dallas Cowboys!

    This is lame even for you, Wankertized!

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    On the evening of December 8th, 1941, USS Enterprise and her escorts entered Pearl Harbor to refuel. Looking on the smoking remains of Battle Ship Row, Admiral Halsey turned to his chief of staff and said: “By the time we’re through with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in hell.”

    Had the plans for invasion proceeded vice the atomic bombing, he’d have been much closer to the mark.

  • SigFan

    Difficult questions come with difficult answers. To protect my family and my country I would go to any lengths. Would that haunt me – I’m sure it would. But the haunting of knowing you could have done something and didn’t would be worse – much worse.

    Excellent post Pilgrim. Kipling did have a way of putting things clearly didn’t he?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Torture has killed more Americans than it has saved.

    And unicorns, too! It’s all there at the same link.

  • Lioncourt

    By your rationalization you can justify anything because they are the enemy and they want to kill us.

    However, there are things we should not do. Unfortunately after 9/11 we lost that guidance. You are upset that Obama is having to instruct on how far we will go in interrogation. Well, it is his job to do so, but it wouldn’t be necessary if we didn’t lose our compass earlier.

  • pparets

    There were no credible threats

  • sayanything-4625

    And just what was the connection between the perpetrators behind 911 and the guys we tortured?

    We captured them on the battlefield?

  • robert108

    Torture has killed more Americans than it has saved.

    An unprovable claim; and totally wrong, as well.

    However, there are things we should not do.

    The main one would be not allowing the terrorists to defeat us. If we fail to do that, nothing else matters.
    As the leftie liar you are, LC, you continue to tell the lie that interrogation is torture. It’s not.

    Your feeble attempt to justify Obama’s appeasing the terrorists by blaming us for their 1300 year old mission to “kill all the infidels” shows intellectual and moral dishonesty.

  • pparets

    Torture has killed more Americans than it has saved.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    eunuchized the beardless catamite of the “freudian projections“, racist apologia, severe reluctance bordering on inability to admit error, and soi dissant “Brown shirt” still does not grok the reciprocal nature of the Customary Laws of Warfare.

    Slow learner indeed.

  • Pilgrim

    Lioncourt:

    There is no rationalization there.

    Using an Army manual that anyone can get their hands on as a rulebook for interrogations is just plain butt stupid.

    And, by the way, just how far would you go? I note that those critical are carefully avoiding an answer.

  • robert108

    Woof: Why did Saddam torture Iraqis? Did they torture him? What’s your rationalization for that torture by a sadistic Islamist?

  • sayanything-4625

    And finally….if you can get over the source of the gathered information, these links go to other bits of evidence that show why it is so important for us to take the higher ground, and how many high ranking US Commanders, officials and CIA agents believe your ideas are DEAD WRONG!

    Funny the CIA’s IG’s report tells a different story. I went over there and look at the links some are from 2001 (hint: the CIA EIT program really kicked off in 2003), are sources from the FBI (I didn’t know they were in the EIT program. That’s right it was a CIA program!) or are wrong. I’ll just ask you a question. When the Gestapo captured members of the French resistance they immediately left all their safe houses, locations and stopped any planned missions, why? Because, if you can vet the information and hold the informee accountable, torture works. But that’s beside the point, EITs are not torture.

  • sayanything-4625

    There were no credible threats, just overreaching cruelty.
    Men and boys sold for ransom to the ignorant.

    The IG report doesn’t seem to think so. Maybe you can tell me why its wrong.

  • sayanything-4625

    Torture has killed more Americans than it has saved.

    You have proof of this?

    1) Iraqis were not our enemies till we invaded .
    2) Torturing Iraqis resulted in their years of actions against our troops.

    They weren’t shooting at us daily in the “no fly zone”? They really didn’t try to kill the first Bush?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Oh no!

    More actual facts, WOOF?

  • Pilgrim

    You’re still not answering the question, Woof….

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    I have a proposition for all the America-haters and Domestic Enemy:

    Leave.

    Step outside the cordon of security which far better men and women than you provide.

    Instead of gibbering like mindless turkeys, leave the security of the America you hate and go — permanently — to the socialist paradises you long for: Cuba, Red China, North Korea, the disputed territories in Pakistan, Chile and countless Third World countries.

    I would love to see the likes of Lie-in-Court, Hann-Tard, Buzz-tard and the you-know-who, the Felching Rimmer, in a grainy video, released on their favorite news outlet (Al-Jazeera) clad in orange jump suits, their masked Islamic friends in close attendance, with weapons and cutlery at the ready.

    Such a setting is the proper home for the likes of such filth.

    They are not Americans.

    It would be fitting to put them outside the city walls and let them use the weapons they wield against their own place of birth in their own defense — and see how far it gets them against Freedom’s Enemies.

  • Pilgrim

    Zig:

    Well said.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    I was thinking that you should go.

    It’s obvious that you hate America and our laws, so take a hike.

    Real Americans have no use for haters like you.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Thanks Pilg.

    BTW

    Do you smell something that stinks real bad?

    Oh.

    Never mind.

  • Mark

    The question never to be answered is how many lives were saved because of the techniques of the
    CIA. Holder & Obama should ask themselves that beore prosecuting heroes.

    The lives they saved may be your own.

  • Pilgrim

    Hannitized,

    Out of all the liberal commentators here I would expect a more rational argument from you than, “Oh Yeah?” Finger pointing is not an argument, and I had nothing to do with the post you just linked.

    While we almost always disagree you can actually make some cogent points from time to time.

    You can do better than what you just posted…can’t you?

    And by the way – same challenge. Answer the question. What would you do?

  • Hannitized

    We’ve done this before, fighting with a bitter enemy who wanted only our complete destruction or subjugation,

    Good thing blacks followed peaceful method of behaving appropriately vs. those who were willing to go far, to prevent their continued subjugation.

  • Hannitized

    How far did the blacks go??

  • Hannitized

    Out of all the liberal commentators here I would expect a more rational argument from you than, “Oh Yeah?” Finger pointing is not an argument, and I had nothing to do with the post you just linked.

    I’m getting tired of all the wonks on this site making stupid statements. Sometimes it feels good just to respond in kind.

    The question is a strange one. How far would I go to protect my family?

    How is that relevant? All of our families are equally in danger from terrorism.

    I suppose I would be willing to go to Afghanistan, bomb anyone who supports or protects Al Qaida and Bin Laden.

    I suppose I would go as far as to ask our military and CIA and other ortanizations to hunt down and kill our enemy.

    I suppose I would go as far as to work from every angle to prevent the spread of terrorism and the ingredients that promote it.

    I suppose I would go as far as to work on a daily basis to help my government protects its top secret information and them more efficiently support their war fighters from an IT perspective.

    I suppose I would go as far as to ensure our government doesn’t behave in a manner that puts our soldiers at greater risk of being tortured because we are doing things we have agreed not to do after learning of the horrors the Nazi’s committed and aslo by signing the Geneva conventions.

  • Pilgrim

    Good thing blacks followed peaceful method of behaving appropriately vs. those who were willing to go far, to prevent their continued subjugation.

    Let’s see….look up the little incident that happened between 1861 and 1865. Ring any bells?

    Now, back to the subject….how far would you go?

  • sayanything-4625

    You reading the same report?

    I don’t know, are you? Those are two different font styles.

    The top one is obviously someone else’s analysis because the bottom is from the IG report.

    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/torture_archive/20040507.pdf

    If you go to the link you’ll notice that the font is the same as the bottom paragraph from WOOF’s report. Care to link to the source of the first paragraph?

    The report I have also address all the allegations you have in your first paragraph.

    As for examples of “unauthorized techniques,” the IG explains that the most “significant”–an accusation that an interrogator threatened a detainee with a gun and a power drill–was the subject of a separate investigation. As for the rest–”the making of threats, blowing cigar smoke, employing certain stress positions, the use of a stiff brush on a detainee, and stepping on a detainee’s ankle shackles”–the IG report says the “allegations were disputed or too ambiguous to reach any authoritative determination” and “did not warrant separate investigations or administrative actions.”

    Go read the conclusions, they start on page 108

    (All of these are summaries by ME. If you don’t believe me go look for yourself)

    Paragraph 250. Program effective, information may have not been gotten any other way.

    251. Lots of people worked long hours to create a program that was within the law. There were some problems.

    252. Everybody worked hard to make sure it was legal.

    253. All EIT are not torture. Whether they are in violation of Art 16 as being cruel and inhumane ?

    254. Still within the law

    255. All officers involved with the program are concerned at some future date they may get thrown under the bus.

    256. The agency has followed all guidelines with one notable exception outlined in the report.

    257. By distinction the Agency failed to provide ad staff at (redacted).

    258. (redacted) conducted an illegal interrogation. This was sent to the DOJ for prosecution. Redacted unauthorized techniques caused a death. The individuals used unsound judgment and the Agency failed to supervise.

    259. The agency failed to supervise and didn’t issue guidance until Jan 2003. By that time, several “unauthorized activities” had taken place.

    260 (Redacted) guidance is inadequate to protect the Agency involved in interrogation activities.

    261 Two detainees were waterboarded in a manner inconsistent with DOJ recommendations. The Agency had told the DOJ that waterboarding may be used more than once but that it loses effectiveness over time so it will not be used for several repetitions. One detainee was waterboarded 183 times and was denied sleep for 180 hours. In these sessions the amount of times and water differed from DOJ opinion.

    262. While detainees had comprehensive medical coverage, they did not have formal guidelines.

    263. Redacted

    264. some detainees may have been subjected to EIT based on faulty analysis.

    265. Redacted

    266. The Agency faces long term political and legal challenges on EIT and because the US doesn’t know what it wants to do with the detainees long term.

    That’s the report I read.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Why does da wiz have my initials framed on his basement wall?

  • Pilgrim

    Hannitized:

    The honest answer (the first one form a liberal in this thread) is appreciated.

    Because here is a fact, albeit one that many of us, especially on the far left, don’t like to admit: When it comes down to it and it’s your family who are threatened, most men and women will do anything, anything, to remove or eliminate that threat. And that includes killing or, if it came right down to it, torture if it meant saving your loved ones.

    That’s life in the jungle, and we’re just not far enough removed from that jungle to sit and say, well, I’d never do that.

    Yeah. Most of us would. And for the rest – Darwin had the perfect theory for them.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    French Poodle said: There were no credible threats, just overreaching cruelty.
    Men and boys sold for ransom to the ignorant.

    Hum, are Michael Moore? There is a terrorist threat and I don’t care what you say, this is 09/10/2001 thinking.

  • robert108

    Woof: Saddam tortured(real torture, not interrogation), murdered and maimed hundreds of thousands of his own people; what did they do to deserve that treatment? Who are you going to blame for that?

  • Hannitized

    I’m trying very hard not to dig up my mp3 of AC/DC’s Another One Bites the Dust. – Move_ZIG

    WTF???

  • Hannitized

    When it comes down to it and it’s your family who are threatened, most men and women will do anything, anything, to remove or eliminate that threat. And that includes killing or, if it came right down to it, torture if it meant saving your loved ones.

    Yes, I agree, but that is not the case in this situation.

    It’s one thing to talk as if my family was in the hands of the terrorists, and as I said, each of us have families equally at risk.

    Commanders of the military and CIA officials are telling us that this is not the right thing to do, and changing the context of the threat isn’t helping the discussion Pilgrim.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Thousands of innocents?

    Greg: WOOF treats facts like dogs treat fire hydrants.

  • Spartacus

    WTF???

    Yeah, bitch, WTF? I thought you were done here. I’m owed money by a few ’cause I knew you were to weak to stick to your word, typical predictable liberal. Now pay up suckers!

  • atease

    Commanders of the military and CIA officials are telling us that this is not the right thing to do, and changing the context of the threat isn’t helping the discussion Pilgrim.

    Is that today or what they were saying in 2001 Hannitized..?

    atease

  • Spartacus

    Is that today or what they were saying in 2001 Hannitized..?

    It doesn’t matter what Han says in response to your question atease, if indeed Han has the courage to respond. He’s a compulsive liar.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Herpi-tized hits a new low…

    Completely false attribution.

    I never said that.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Took a couple milli-seconds, but found the original quote here.

    Don’t worry Hann-Tard, this doesn’t affect your credibility.

    It’s been in the toilet since forever.

  • jharp

    And just what was the connection between the perpetrators behind 911 and the guys we tortured?

    Trying to justify torture. By drawing a non existent correlation with WW2.

    Deranged and sick and dishonest and dishonoring to those whose fought in WW2.

  • atease

    And just what was the connection between the perpetrators behind 911 and the guys we tortured?

    Just one little thing I believe, especially since we only water boarded 3 times (IIRC), and that is they want to kill my kids.

    Both the 19 murderers on the planes and the folks in Cuba want to kill my kids, and your kids too by the way. Oh, and they want to end the US of A as well.

    atease

  • Bat One

    In my opinion, those who show contempt for civility are not entitled to its usual protections.

    On Sept 20, 1985, four Soviet diplomats were kidnapped in Beirut by the Islamic Liberation Organization, a Salafist Sunni front for the Iranian-backed Hezbollah. One of the hostages, the embassy doctor, was tortured and shot and his body dumped near the Soviet embassy. The next day several of the ILO leader’s relatives were taken by the KGB. His younger brother was tortured, castrated, decapitated, and his testicles placed in his mouth. His body parts, including the head, were left on the street outside the ILO headquarters with the demand that the remaining Soviet kidnap victims be returned. The three kidnapped Russians were released that afternoon.

    The idea that we should be nice, or respectful and decent to captured terrorists is not only absurd, but stupidly deluded and dangerous. The idea that we should avoid being mean or brutal to them in the hope that a captured American won’t be tortured or slaughtered is simply a ludicrous excuse for timidity and surrender. WSJ reporter Danny Pearl would understand.

  • Lioncourt

    The idea that we should be nice, or respectful and decent to captured terrorists is not only absurd, but stupidly deluded and dangerous.

    It isn’t about being nice or respectful. There are things that are just wrong.

    The fact that you would approve the taking of innocent family members and killing them says alot about you.

  • Bat One

    The fact that you would approve the taking of innocent family members and killing them says alot about you.

    Yeah… I suppose it does. But to be honest, it doesn’t begin to describe what I’d be willing to do, without remorse, to defend myself, my family, or my country.

  • Lioncourt

    But to be honest, it doesn’t begin to describe what I’d be willing to do, without remorse, to defend myself, my family, or my country.

    Don’t give yourself too much credit, you would do it just because they are the enemy.

  • Bat One

    … you would do it just because they are the enemy.

    I’m not especially surprised, but what makes you think you’re qualified to identify or judge my motives?

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Had to address Woof’s stupidity:

    1) Iraqis were not our enemies till we invaded .

    While them shooting at our planes and Saddam trying to kill Bush Sr. has been discussed, Saddam’s role in supporting terrorists in unquestioned. He was a major financeer of Hamas, Hezbollah, Egyptian Islamic Jihad (a wing of al Quida under Zawahiri), and more. He paid suicide bombers’ families in Palestine based on how many people they killed. (Israel being our closest ally in the region.)

    2) Torturing Iraqis resulted in their years of actions against our troops.

    Or al Quida attacked us, and were exclusively foreign or former Baathist.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Do you see the Leftist dynamic at work here?

    Their moral ambivalence is on display for all to see.

    They cannot, indeed, will not distinguish between naked aggression and valid self defense.

    They cannot distinguish between the gun in the hand of a death camp guard and the M-1 carried by the US soldier liberating that same death camp.

    They blind themselves to our need to defend ourselves against totalitarian aggression and in the same breath, are vociferous apologists for the most evil dictators.

    Their forebears defended Stalin in this manner, denouncing rumors of the slaughter and starvation of the Kulaks and other enemies of Communism as a filthy, trumped-up lie.

    They marched in the streets, fists aloft, singing the praises of the likes of Mao and Ho Chi Mihn.

    To this very day, the posters that adorn their homes, dorms and offices are of Marx and Lenin, and on their T-Shirts, the cowardly murderer Che Guevara.

    As in every case of Leftist lies about lies, their entire defense was built around a huge lie.

    And like their forebears, when, years hence, the truth emerges, and the bodies of the victims have long since rotted to bones in some unmarked mass grave, they never acknowledge that they were wrong, but change the subject and launch into tirades, using a fresh batch of lies.

    There is something very, very wrong with their minds…

    …perhaps their souls.

  • Wayne

    I get a kick out of all the moral indignation from the lefties. The fact is if there was a democrat in the WH and much worst was done, all you would hear is crickets. Want proof? Just imagine the Bush WH was pulling all the shit we’re seeing now. The double standard and hypocrisy of the left make me sick.

  • Hannitized

    Oh, I confused Move_Homophobe with Kitty-poo. Mea Culpa!

    They are two like-minded phonies.

  • Hannitized

    Wayne,

    How do you explain Jimmy Carter then? Face it. Many Americans, including conservatives are against things that endanger our troops and set the wrong standards.

    There is a difference about what WE would do should our family be in immediate harm. Today, right now, I would shoot any son of a bitch in the face if they messed with my family, in a cruel or inhumane manner.

    This is why we support justified war and justified homicide of our enemies, but we don’t condone torture. It’s pretty simple.

    You have any questions go talk to Patreaus.

  • Wayne

    Hanny,

    What I said was true. Where is all the outrage from the left with all the crap from the Obama WH?

  • Wayne

    Another thing. Has the Iraq War suddly become “justifiable” now that a democrat is in the WH? Where are the protests? What happened to the liberal press when Cindy went east?

  • Wayne

    Another thing. Has the Iraq War suddly become “justifiable” now that a democrat is in the WH? Where are the protests? What happened to the liberal press when Cindy went east?

  • Hannitized

    What I said was true. Where is all the outrage from the left with all the crap from the Obama WH?

    You were talking about torture, now you’re talking about domestic issues, namely the stimulus.

    Leftists were outraged about having a prisoner camp outside of the US, as proposed by Obama.

    If Obama’s administration is caught promoting the type of interrogating techniques criticized today, I will wager you will see a lot.

    One difference i will grant you is that the left trusts Obama…..right now. So he is granted a certain amount of leeway Bush did not enjoy from the left.

    Obama will be judged, don’t you worry.

  • wayne

    Sorry about posting that twice. I was trying to correct my spelling error (‘suddenly’). I get frustrated by people who deny the obvious. And its late. I’m staying up with a sick two year old while Mom gets some sleep.

  • wayne

    So even after all the crap in just seven months the left “trusts” this Chicago politician and his astroturfing lying thugs? Tell what would he have to do to not be trusted. I well say it again. If it were Bush you would be going crazy. Face it the left are hypocrites. The same goes for all the “torture” outrage. If there was a democrat in the WH at the time you guys would readily admit the there was no torture and it was worth the lives that it saved. Double. Standard.

  • Hannitized

    Wayne,

    Many Democrats come from a long family of union members and union leadership. We have seen people dedicate their lives to ensuring the little guy gets an even break. I know, I am one of them.

    Some of us have spent our lives working in politics to make a small difference to the average American.

    You are as distrusting of Obama as we were of Bush. I wasn’t as outraged about many things he did, but i was about the Iraq war.

    You talk about Obama as if he hailed from Chicago, but he was raised in Hawaii by a very kind and intelligent family that originated from kansas.

    You have got to stop letting people rile you up and start looking at the evidence and not what you are told.

    You have bought a lie.

  • Hannitized

    BTW, i don’t care about double postings or misspellings. It happens man.

    But I can only imagine how stressful handling a 2yo in the middle of the night could be.

    Yikes.

  • wayne

    Don’t you dare give me that self righteous crap. I was raised by a good man, an average American. Lower middle class working people. He taught me that I am responsible for myself and my actions. That I have to work for what I get.

    If there would have been a democrat in the WH, the democrats in congress would not have said a word about “torture”, the liberal press would not have said a word either. I am amazed by how easy it is for the democrat powers that be to lead you people around by the nose. If its a democrat talking point, you guys are right on it. If its not, your not.

  • Hannitized

    Don’t you dare give me that self righteous crap. I was raised by a good man, an average American. Lower middle class working people. He taught me that I am responsible for myself and my actions. That I have to work for what I get.

    Clap, clap, clap.

    What does that have to do with what I said about union people and democrats dedicating their lives to help others instead of a desire to acquire fortune? Answer: Nothing.

    I didn’t say that only they are good people, only that your characterizations are a lie.

    If there would have been a democrat in the WH, the democrats in congress would not have said a word about “torture”, the liberal press would not have said a word either.

    And you know this…….becauuuuusssseeee??

    I am amazed by how easy it is for the democrat powers that be to lead you people around by the nose. If its a democrat talking point, you guys are right on it. If its not, your not.

    Hahaha! Ok.

    What is your point? Who are these “democrat powers” you speak of?

  • jk

    It’s obvious that you hate America and our laws, so take a hike.
    Real Americans have no use for haters like you.

    And yet you applaud scum like Dino.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Damn, Spart,

    That girl on your new avatar has azz for dayz.

    Yikes!

    Too bad most of the local chicks here are of the Hippobottomi species and — horrifically enough — wear Spandex while shopping for Cheezy-Poofs at WalMart.

  • Bat One

    Many Americans, including conservatives are against things that endanger our troops and set the wrong standards.

    I’ve always been amused by the sheer childish stupidity of the “keeping our troops safe” argument. Talk about irrelevance. And sanctimony!

    It’s invariably offered by those kids on the far Left who have no direct military knowledge, much less combat experience, for whom the argument sounds good, even if it makes no sense in reality.

    Of course there is no proof whatsoever that our own behavior toward or treatment of terrorists would in any way influence how a captured US serviceman or woman would be treated. Military personnel, real ones, understand this. And those who are aghast at the waterboarding of Khalid Sheik Mohammed, for example, self-righteously overlook who, or what, they’re dealing with. KSM is not only the 9/11 mastermind, but the man who bragged about having decapitated reporter Danny Pearl… long before anyone had ever heard of Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib.

    Nor is it a settled matter that waterboarding actually constitutes “torture.” There are respectable opinions on both sides of that issue.

    There may be some slight argument that the liberal manner of addressing terrorist captives sets an example, but that’s really more about self-serving sanctimony than any real world regard or reciprocity. Blood thirsty animals who delight in slaughtering innocent women and children are unlikely to respond to cordiality and good will, no matter how well-intended. And the argument about “lost goodwill” is often trumpeted but never proven.

    Team Obama’s actions can only be construed to mean that the rookies from Chicago have no more idea what they’re doing in the area of foreign policy and national defense than they do with domestic economic policy. National security isn’t something that those on the Left are serious about.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    Nice post Pilgrim

    And those who are aghast at the waterboarding of Khalid Sheik Mohammed,

    I’ve got no qualms with that bastard being waterboarded or worse. I largely trusted our guys to know who was worth (and deserved) harsher interrogation. The fact only three guys got waterboarded indicates to me they were careful.

    “We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.” — Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

  • navtechie

    I suppose I would go as far as to ensure our government doesn’t behave in a manner that puts our soldiers at greater risk of being tortured because we are doing things we have agreed not to do after learning of the horrors the Nazi’s committed and aslo by signing the Geneva conventions

    Hannitized: You can’t be tortured when you’re head is lying in your lap. The tired argument that it puts our soldiers at greater risk is a bunch of shit, and you know it.

    Crazy is crazy. You can’t make em “crazier”. There is only so many ways to cut off someone’s head, or put a bullet into it. The effect is the same either way. So drop the “put soldiers into more danger” bullshit.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    There is only so many ways to cut off someone’s head, or put a bullet into it.

    You’re being too kind, omitting such things as torture with power drills, doused and burned with gasoline, plastic shredders, rape, rape to death (mostly female), same to children in front of parents, etc. All happened before Bush and similar after. We just watched from a more comfortable distance before 9/11.

  • Pilgrim

    Greg:

    But we put panties on someone’s head. And blew cigar smoke in someone’s face. And put a power drill next to someone’s head.

    NVA? Amateurs. Al Qaeda? Rookies. Japanese? Mere children.

    Panties on the head, though…..I shudder at the thought. (leaving out, of course, the fact that some people pay pefectly good money for the very same treatment.)

    Heh.

  • SigFan

    Yeah, but you forgot shoving them up against a padded wall that makes loud noises. That would probably be really scary. Scarred for life I tell ‘ya.

  • Hannitized

    Hey Bat,

    Good morning! Have you woken up yet? Try this!

    [T]here are serving U.S. flag-rank officers who maintain that the first and second identifiable causes of U.S. combat deaths in Iraq — as judged by their effectiveness in recruiting insurgent fighters into combat — are, respectively the symbols of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly82Kc1H6Fw

    • JAGs: Enhanced techniques endangers U.S. soldiers.
    “Employment of exception techniques may have a negative effect on the treatment of U.S. POWs by their captors and raises questions about the ability of the U.S. to call others to account for mistreatment of U.S. servicemembers.” [memos from Deputy JAG of Air Force Jack Rives, Navy JAG Michael Lohr, and Staff JAG to the Commandant of the Marine Corps Kevin Sandkuhler, to Air Force General Counsel Mary Walker, Feb. 2003. Senate Armed Services Report,

    http://documents.nytimes.com/report-by-the-senate-armed-services-committee-on-detainee-treatment#p=2

  • Hannitized

    Panties on the head, though…..I shudder at the thought.

    Nobody is talking about that Pilgrim…..and you know it.

    You ask me to elevate the debate, keep it rational, they you say things like that.

    How about a little balance bud?

  • Hannitized

    And finally….if you can get over the source of the gathered information, these links go to other bits of evidence that show why it is so important for us to take the higher ground, and how many high ranking US Commanders, officials and CIA agents believe your ideas are DEAD WRONG!

    http://thinkprogress.org/why-enhanced-interrogation-failed/

  • Onslaught

    You talk about Obama as if he hailed from Chicago, but he was raised in Hawaii by a very kind and intelligent family that originated from Kansas.

    I thought he said he was raised by his racist grandma, you know a typical white person…

    or are you calling Obama a liar? and that’s just racist of you.

  • Hannitized

    It’s not surprising that both of you are reduced to hyperbole and nonsense.

    Where he became a politician is not indicative of how he conducts himself.

    I worked for WorldCom, but left because it was corrupt from top down. I earned the nick name “Mr. Integrity” because I pissed so many people off refusing to participate on any project that was not beneficial to our customers.

    Same thing happens to good people everywhere. Unless you want to condemn ever Republican or person in the entire state with your silly presumptions?

    Be adult, if just for a moment. Will ya?

  • Onslaught

    Where he became a politician is not indicative of how he conducts himself.

    That is certainly true, I don’t doubt that he would conduct himself any differently if, instead of becoming a senator from Chicago, he had been elected… say, to the Politburo in Soviet Russia.

  • Pilgrim

    I worked for WorldCom, but left because it was corrupt from top down. I earned the nick name “Mr. Integrity” because I pissed so many people off refusing to participate on any project that was not beneficial to our customers.

    Actually, Hannitized, I can believe that based on the way you stick to an argument, even in the face of fact. There, you’ve just had your compliment for the year. Now as to this:

    Nobody is talking about that Pilgrim…..and you know it.

    That’s exactly what we’re talking about. Instead of treating these things for what they were – relatively minor abuses for which people paid with their careers or jail – the left and media pounced on them and beat them like a drum in order to discredit Bush and the war in Iraq.

    They forfeited any sense of decency, and they’re not through yet. They won’t be satisfied until we can’t do anything but ask terror suspects nicely (after Miranda)if they plan on killing anyone – or everyone.

    Good men and women will regret having done their duty.

    That is EXACTLY the point.

  • Pilgrim

    By the way, did you actually read the article I posted above, or did you just jump into the coment thread without context?

    Just asking.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    If Obama’s administration is caught promoting the type of interrogating techniques criticized today, I will wager you will see a lot.

    Of course, this too is a lie. Obama announced at the beginning of the year that he was abandoning EIC, then he formed a committee to see about using EIC.

    The result? Crickets.

    And this silliness about EIC making our soldiers less safe is hyperbole. Our baby gloves on the Viet Cong and NVs didn’t stop them from torturing McCain and our other POWs. Under Clinton, kid gloves didn’t stop al Quida from shooting a wheelchaired vet and pushing him overboard. Us following the Geneva convention didn’t stop the mass murder of our surrendering soldiers by the Germans (in violation of the Geneva Conventions), not did it stop the genocide of the Jews.

    Why not just admit that evil people are motivated by evil and not by grievances? There is nothing we could’ve done to stop Hitler from killing the Jews. No land given, no concessions, no amount of money would’ve stopped his insane genocide. No amount of warnings stopped Saddam’s torture rooms (where they’d have loved to be water boarded instead of put through a paper shredder), his rape and torture of Shia, or his genocide against the Kurds. The harshest criticism didn’t stop the Rwandan massacre and is doing nothing in Sudan either.

    This idea that if we just treat our enemies as friends to be, they will put down their guns, has been repeatedly decimated by the reality of history. But those of us with heads devoid of intelligence and swelled with hubris continue to buy into it. Why? Simple vanity. Some of us simply believe that they are so enlightened, so brilliant, so skilled and gifted that they can change the very fabric of reality.

    Such vanity and irreality is dangerous and must be fought just as hard as the evil itself.

  • tothestars2

    Torture? The American style of torture is a joke. Just read up on how the japanese, chinese, ancient romans, NATIVE Americans, ancient south americans of the amazon area, Kubla Kahn, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Polpot,…etc and u will laugh at anyone who calls what modern day AMERICANS classify as “torture”. LOL.

  • Hannitized

    Our baby gloves on the Viet Cong and NVs didn’t stop them from torturing McCain and our other POWs.

    And yet John McCain says that it makes US prisoners less safe and more likely to be tortured.

    You have picked an odd poster boy for your lie Kenny.

    But, hey….who would have suspected any less?

  • Bat One

    H,

    I just noticed your comment above, and I wonder how many of those “high-ranking officers” you quoted have actual battlefield experience? How many have “been there… doe that?” Jack Rives? Michael Lohr? Kevin Sandkuhler? Or Mary Walker? Which of them has actually engaged in a firefight and killed a enemy combatants? How many Bronze and Silver Stars among the 4 of them?

    Needless to say, I’m not one bit impressed with the politically correct opinions of some REMF who writes memos in support of the opinions of those who might one day award him a star, a flag, and an aide-de-camp. Those people, and those opinions, are a dime a dozen, and even at that are way, way over-priced.

    Try this instead… Find me a third tour NCO, an Army SFC or a USMC Gunnery Sgt, E-6 or E-7, who’ll vouch that “enhanced interrogation techniques should not be selectively employed against captured terrorists because they put him and his men at possible risk of reprisal if they are captured.

    Then, maybe, you’ll have an argument worth listening to.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Who says the “or” is exclusive?

  • Pilgrim

    Try this instead… Find me a third tour NCO, an Army SFC or a USMC Gunnery Sgt, E-6 or E-7, who’ll vouch that “enhanced interrogation techniques should not be selectively employed against captured terrorists because they put him and his men at possible risk of reprisal if they are captured.

    Amen. Truer word have never been spoken.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    No doubt.

    Those front-line Guys, who know their men and look out for their welfare, know exactly what is on the line.

    For them the stakes are clear: US or THEM.

    There can be no doubt or equivocation — if I have to choose between the safety of my men and accomplishing the mission and the lives or discomfort of some dirtbag hyena terrorist, terrorist loses — every — fucking — time.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    Torture? The American style of torture is a joke. Just read up on how the japanese, chinese, ancient… etc

    Hannitized, you omitted his very important point. It’s a stretch to call what we did ‘torture.’ Besides that, the harshest of what we did was reserved for a very select few with known intelligence that could be corroborated, very important point because it destroys the ‘torture is useless’ argument.

    We also had guys go clearly over the line, criminal offenses that were handled as crimes.

    We’ve pushed our troops to where taking prisoners, always a liability in some ways, is now career suicide. This is bad for the troops, gathering intel, the country, our allies.

  • WOOFX

    Is the question would I atom bomb the Japanese so that American forces wouldn’t have to invade the Japanese homeland ?
    The answer is yes.
    Would I bomb the Japanese because Saudi radicals blew up the Trade Center?
    The answer is no.

  • sayanything-6955

    Prosecuting the men and women of the CIA for protecting their homes and country is wrong on so many levels that I simply can’t list them all. But, it’s easy, isn’t it, to sit in judgment from the comforts of home, family, and office?

    Brilliant Pilgrim!!

    For me it’s “God bless those brave people”

  • sayanything-6955

    Tough to argue about the “credible threats” in that picture, pparets. Perfect!!

  • WOOFX

    1) Iraqis were not our enemies till we invaded .
    2) Torturing Iraqis resulted in their years of actions against our troops.

  • WOOFX

    You reading the same report?

    The IG Report also documents numerous other abuses that have been documented by prior OLC memos, including having waterboarded detainees 82 and 183 times; hanging them by their arms until interrogators thought their shoulders might be dislocated; stepping on their ankle shackles to cause severe bruising and pain; putting them in a diapers and leaving them doused with water on cold concrete floors in cold temperatures to induce hypothermia, etc. Some of the numerous deaths of detainees during interrogations were also discussed

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  • WOOFX

    There were no credible threats, just overreaching cruelty.
    Men and boys sold for ransom to the ignorant.

  • WOOFX

    Those masters, almost to a man, always sat in judgment from the comforts of home, family, and office?

  • WOOFX

    Nobody wants CIA operatives prosecuted except their masters
    who facilitated, ordered, condoned and justified torture .

  • WOOFX

    Torture has killed more Americans than it has saved.

  • WOOFX

    Thousands of innocents were tortured.

    They Sow the Wind, and Reap the Whirlwind.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development