Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, August 02, 2007


House Democrats Pass More “Free” Health Care For Poor Kids

Except that this health care package isn’t really for “poor kids.”  This massive entitlement expansion, ostensibly $35 billion in new obligatory spending per year to be paid with by a 20,000% increase in tobacco taxes though it’ll end up costing far more than that, is for all children who belong to families with incomes $82,000 or less.

Keep in mind that approximately 83% of American households earn around $82,000 or less according to the Census Bureau.  This isn’t a program for poor kids.  This is, as Robert Novak put it last month, “the thin edge of the wedge to achieve the longtime goal of government-supplied universal health insurance and the suffocation of the private system.”  By making nearly all American citizens eligible for SCHIP, Democrats encourage them to become dependent on the government for medical care for their children.  Which is another step toward getting them dependent on the government for medical care for themselves.

This is how liberals herd people onto the victimhood plantation.  They tell them that they’re poor and can’t afford health care on their own, then they vote other people’s money out of the nation’s treasury to pay for these people’s entitlements and make them dependent on the government, and then finally they use that dependence to control them.

Just like how Democrats get votes from farmers by turning them into victims and then pandering to them with subsidies.  Same with minority groups like blacks too.  “You can’t get ahead unless we give you affirmative action and all sorts of special treatment, so vote for us!” It isn’t about empowerment, or making people better so that they can stand on their own two feet, it’s about subjugation.

And trust me, that’s what socialized medicine will be: Subjugation.  Once we’re all hooked on government health care, and once private health care providers are so marginalized by an inability to compete with the government (which has no need to turn a profit) that only the rich can afford them, our dependence on politicians for health care will be used to change how we live.

The anti-smoking folks will be demanding that smokers pay more in taxes.  The anti-fat people will be demanding that regulations against unhealthy foods be passed for the sake of saving tax dollars (or denying you access to medical procedures if they decide you’re too fat).  And all this while you wait six months for knee surgery like they do in Canada and Great Britain.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

“I mean, people have access to health care in America,” President Bush said earlier this month. “After all, you just go to an emergency room.”

Tell that to the parents of 9 million uninsured children around this country.

The U.S. Senate is set to vote on a $35 billion increase in funding for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Such an increase would allow 3.2 million uninsured children—the ones Bush thinks should just head to the nearest emergency room when they get sick—to become eligible for the program.

Tell your senators to make sure Bush can’t veto this critical funding.

While threatening to kill the legislation, Bush has claimed new funding for SCHIP “opens an avenue for people to switch from private insurance to the government.”

He’s wrong. These children aren’t switching from anything—they’re uninsured. To clarify for President Bush: They do not have health insurance.

The Senate Finance Committee just passed the bill with an enthusiastic, bipartisan vote of 17-4. Six of the 10 Republicans on the committee supported the bill.

The 10-year-old program expires Sept. 30. It’s time for the Senate to defy Bush’s veto threat and help ensure millions of low-income children get the health care coverage they desperately need.

FE

Fasteddie753 on August 2, 2007 at 06:30 am

Tell that to the parents of 9 million uninsured children around this country.

Well sure, there’s “9 million uninsured children” if you count the people in between jobs (out of insurance for a couple of months at most) and the illegal aliens.

Honest people wouldn’t do that though.

And what, exactly, are we supposed to be telling these children? Why did you bring up the children anyways? It is a cheap emotional ploy.

Tell your senators to make sure Bush can’t veto this critical funding.

No. We don’t want socialism here.

While threatening to kill the legislation, Bush has claimed new funding for SCHIP “opens an avenue for people to switch from private insurance to the government.”

He’s wrong.

The cutoff level is 82,000. That includes most of America. I’d say that he’s right in that the incentives change and people will then be moving away from private to government.

These children aren’t switching from anything—they’re uninsured. To clarify for President Bush: They do not have health insurance.

82% of America’s children are uninsured?

The 10-year-old program expires Sept. 30. It’s time for the Senate to defy Bush’s veto threat and help ensure millions of low-income children get the health care coverage they desperately need.

It’s not the government’s job.

And stop with the cheap emotional ploys. Just argue the merits of the program.

likwidshoe on August 2, 2007 at 06:58 am

Tell that to the parents of 9 million uninsured children around this country.

I’d tell the illegal parents to go back to the country they’re a legal resident in or for the few that are US citizens I’d tell them to get a job.

I realize of course that it’s unreasonable to expect people who are able to take care of themselves.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on August 2, 2007 at 07:44 am

Where’s my free health care? I pay taxes, give it to me!


No Free Lunch
25i20w9.jpg

Kevin on August 2, 2007 at 10:10 am
Avatar for Steve

Can we send Fasteddie753 to Canada or England when he gets stick? Hopefully he’s not fat, otherwise he won’t get any care in England.

Steve on August 2, 2007 at 10:24 am

Kevin, Kevin, Kevin,

You’re not entitled to any free healthcare precisely because you DO pay taxes.  Once you learn to stop being a productive, self-sufficient, tax-paying member of society and come to expect that all life’s benefits will be handed to you despite any substantive effort on your part, then you can have all the free healthcare you and your family are willing to stand in line and wait for.


“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

Bat One on August 2, 2007 at 10:25 am
Avatar for pat

Yes but have you a true understanding of how they define “poor”??

pat on October 8, 2007 at 06:07 pm
Avatar for J Maverick

Huh? You may want to take a look at this
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/10planks.htm

J Maverick on March 4, 2009 at 10:39 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.