Homeland Security Manages To Tick Off The Unions And The Chamber Of Commerce

A rare feat detailed in this article from CQ Politics (subscription required):

The Department of Homeland Security may not have the authority to issue a new rule aimed at reducing the hiring of illegal immigrants, according to the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who may go to court to stop the rule.
On Friday, DHS is expected to announce regulations requiring employers to take additional steps to confirm certain employees are authorized to work in the United States. An employer who fails to follow the rules could be fined for knowingly employing an illegal immigrant.
In a rare fit of agreement, the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce both say they have a problem with the proposed rule.
The nation’s largest federation of labor unions says legal immigrant workers will suffer discrimination under the rule. The chamber fears employers will be sued for just that. Both are considering suing to stop the rule, while cautioning that they have not seen its final language.

From the Chamber of Commerce’s perspective (and the perspective of business owners) this is a bad rule:

Under the rule as proposed in June 2006, employers would be required to resolve “no-match letters” sent to them by the Social Security Administration, or could be considered to have knowingly hired an illegal immigrant. The letters indicate an employee’s name and Social Security number do not match SSA records. No-matches can indicate something as simple as a clerical error — a woman who had not updated her employment records after changing her name after marriage, for example — or that an illegal immigrant is using a false or stolen Social Security number to gain employment.

Basically, the federal government is trying to turn employers into defacto enforcers of federal law. Which is total bunk. If the federal government would secure the border already and take actual, legitimate steps to clear the illegal immigration population out of America employers wouldn’t have to worry so much about illegals showing up with faked SSN’s and other documents. Trying to foist detection and enforcement duties on American businesses is a total abdication of responsibility.
From the perspective of the unions, however, how funny is it that they’re trying to claim that the federal government has no authority to try and root illegal immigrants out of our workforce. Because that is something they absolutely have the authority to do. They just shouldn’t be using that authority to try and make employers do the enforcing when clearly that’s the job of federal law enforcement.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • k_lunch

    When I was in college, I had to go through a huge ordeal because my employer entered the spelling of my last name incorrectly so SSA required me to jump through hoops just to prove who I was. If a person such as myself could be so easily singled out like that, how are they not catching the illegals who use fake numbers? It just doesn't seem fair that if my name had been Lopez, they would have looked the other way.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    It seems to me that if an employer is unable to get a valid Social Security number that employee shouldn't be working.

    Right now we have a bunch of BS where the employer has to go through the motions of filling out the paperwork (and God forbid that someone should forget) but nothing comes of those that use fake ID.

    Crazy.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    The Department of Homeland Security may not have the authority to issue a new rule aimed at reducing the hiring of illegal immigrants, according to the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who may go to court to stop the rule.

    I am not sure how a judge can rule against the law, since illegal aliens aren't entitled to work legally in this country. If this is the case that Judge should be put on trial and impeached/removed.

  • WOOFX

    You asked for Bush to enforce immigration law, you got it.
    Stop bitchin.

    Es la ley.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    You asked for Bush to enforce immigration law, you got it.
    Stop bitchin.

    We asked the Bush administration to enforce immigration law, not try and make employers enforce it.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    There is no reason these businesses are not held accountable for hiring illegal aliens. The union's stance on illegal aliens is puzzling because I thought they were for workers rights. However, illegal aliens are causing people to lose jobs and wages.

    I find it funny that Lefttards want open immigration and having santuary cities where people are not asked questions about their immigration status and they in essences and then these are the same ones that are brining wages down and cutting their own workers throats. Doesn't seem to make any sense to me.

  • WOOFX

    Employers are not required to arrest anyone, just not employ them.

    Under a 1986 law, employers must ask job applicants for documents to verify that they are United States citizens or immigrants authorized to work here.

    Es La Ley

  • HG

    If this conservative got his way nobody would need a SS# to get a job because the employee would be responsible for paying his own taxes eliminating employer with-holdings. Employers should not be responsible for the legality of their employees. Methinks this is the conservative position. Gov't mandated enforcement cost the employer and subsequently the consumer who purchases the goods and services provided by any given company subject to the madates. In short, these mandates are paid for by the consumer. Pretty crafty eh?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Employers are not required to arrest anyone, just not employ them.

    So now I, as an employer, have to know how to discern forged SSN cards and drivers licenses? And face the risk of a lawsuit if I accuse someone of having a fake and am wrong?

    Maybe the government should do it's job and secure the flippin' border already, and actually do something to get the illegals already here out of the country.

  • WOOFX

    Payback from the administration

    Mr. Chertoff suggested that employers should focus their ire on Congress for failing to pass the broader immigration measure. "We can be very sure that we let Congress understand the consequences of the choices that Congress makes," he said.

    PAYBACK

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development