Hillary Clinton: Oil Prices Will Go Down Just Because I’m President

One of the most absurd campaign promises made to sense.

MANCHESTER, N.H. – Hillary Clinton predicted Saturday that just electing her President will cut the price of oil.
When the world hears her commitment at her inauguration about ending American dependence on foreign fuel, Clinton says, oil-pumping countries will lower prices to stifle America’s incentive to develop alternative energy.
“I predict to you, the oil-producing countries will drop the price of oil,” Clinton said, speaking at the Manchester YWCA. “They will once again assume, once the cost pressure is off, Americans and our political process will recede.”
Clinton argued that former President Jimmy Carter in the late 1970s actually started moving in the right direction toward energy independence, but his successor, Ronald Reagan, “dismantled” that work.
“Because costs were low, people didn’t care, didn’t complain,” she said.

Does that make any sense? I have no doubt that OPEC manipulates prices, but Hillary praises the policies of the Carter administration? Weren’t there widespread gas shortages under Carter? Not to mention sky-high gas prices? Mostly because Jimmy and his fellow Democrats pushed through new taxes and regulations on the oil industry that drove production and distribution costs, and thus gas prices, higher?
Gas prices went down under Reagan because he deregulated and cut taxes. What Hillary seems to be promising here is not so much ending dependence on foreign oil but rather taxing-and-regulating America back to the exorbitant price of fuel from the 1970′s (something we haven’t reached yet even at today’s high prices once you adjust for inflation).

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Bill Mitchell

    Here is how STUPID that comment was.

    Oil producing countries DO NOT set the price of oil! That is done by oil traders on the commodity exchanges. All oil-producing countries can do is change output.

    The woman is an idiot. I hope the Republicans jump on this.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    All oil-producing countries can do is change output.

    Which worked pretty well for OPEC to drive up prices a few years back (for those of us without ADD, or are old enough to remember!)

  • Bill Mitchell

    Rob,

    For once we agree. That may have been the dumbest thing I have EVER heard a candidate for POTUS say.

    She doesn’t even understand why oil prices go up and down.

    Wow, incredible.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    How can I make it any clearer:

    I know! I’ll type in ALL CAPS! :) /sarcasm

  • robert108

    What happens when a manufacturer has an excess of inventory?

    The price goes down until supply and demand match again. Econ 101

  • http://ewebsmith.com/ ews48

    What happens when a manufacturer has an excess of inventory? If oil producing countries reduce production, as they often intentionally decide to do as a group, and there is an oil shortage, what do you suspect will happen to the price of oil? What do you suspect will happen if they increase production and there is a market excess?

    The good thing about this global warming hysteria is that the development of alternative fuel sources will not be determined by the price of oil. PG&E already has plans to convert 60% of their energy sources to alternative fuel within ten years.

    http://www.wecandothis.com/

  • Bat One

    A promise from the Democrats’ leading candidate for President to take us back to the economic policies of the Carter Administration!?

    What a truly breathtaking Christmas gift to the GOP! I wonder which Republican will be the first to utter the magic phrase “Misery Index”.

  • robert108

    Hillary’s not promising lower gas prices, she’s promising to get lower oil prices, and then the federal government can raise the taxes to fill the gap that’s left between old oil prices and new.

    Yes, because we all know how Hillary and the rest of the Dems like to “mandate” things. Bye bye “free people making free choices”.

  • Bill Mitchell

    History has shown us that the US economy cannot withstand gas over $3 a gallon. Any higher and it becomes recessionary and inflationary.

    Oil prices only traded up close to $100 a barrel because gas prices were not rising hand in hand. Once gas got over $3 a gallon, you will notice that oil prices came back down.

    Right now, there is an “oil bubble” in the commodities market. A “bubble” occurs when a traded instrument (internet stocks, real estate, oil), trades at a higher valuation than its intrinsic value as a commodity.

    In other words, when real estate goes up, not because of it’s value as shelter, but because they trader thinks someone else will pay more for it than he did.

    Once the bubble “bursts”, the commodity always comes back down to its intrinsic value. That is what will happen to oil every time gas goes over $3 a gallon.

    If oil prices send the US economy into a recession, the oil traders have “killed the goose that laid the golden egg”, so they back off. Traders sell their long positions and go short, thus putting downward pressure on prices.

    That’s how it REALLY works. Not that Hillary Clinton would have any clue.

  • Bill Mitchell

    How can I make it any clearer:

    OIL PRODUCING COUNTRIES DO NOT NOT NOT SET OIL PRICES. Oil prices are set by traders on the commodities markets. Also contrary to popular belief, oil companies DO NOT set oil prices. They do have some control, however, on the margins that are charged for the price of gasoline at the pump. Usually, gasoline costs about 60 cents more at the pump that it costs the oil companies to make it.

    The fact that Hillary Clinton thinks oil-producing countries can “reduce oil prices” means that she does not understand the MOST BASIC fundamentals of the problem.

    Scary.

    Once again, you will NEVER see gas stay above an inflation-adjusted $3 a gallon nationally in the USA. Gas above $3 a gallon produces a significant drag on the economy, thus reducing the demand for oil, thus driving down the price.

    Think of $3 as the “pain point”.

    THE FUTURE:
    Within 5 years, most cars will run on hydrogen fuel cells or 100% electric motors which can fully recharge in 5 minutes.

    We will look back nastalgically on when we used to actually burn rotted vegetation from 100 million years ago in order to get around in the same way we recall the rotary dial telephone now.

    As the technology involved in actually “broadcasting” electricity (i.e., no wires) improves, eventually, electricity could be transmmitted to your car along the roadways like cell signals are now transmitted to your phone.

    That’s what makes the new legislation that requires 35 MPG by the year 2020 is so laughable. By the year 2020, the use of fossil fuels by anything except perhaps jet airplanes and electric plants will be a thing of ancient history (and even they will burn cellulose-based hydrocarbons derived from things like garbage and animal waste).

  • Hoss

    The price goes down until supply and demand match again

    Bingo, equilibrium.

    And Bat, that’s the first thing I thought: Hillary’s actually going to campaign on bringing back the misery index…Merry Christmas to the Republicans. Hillary’s not promising lower gas prices, she’s promising to get lower oil prices, and then the federal government can raise the taxes to fill the gap that’s left between old oil prices and new.

  • Mickey

    When Bill was president we here in Wisconsin paid over $2.00 a gallon for gas. At that time we were .40 cents higher than the national average. At todays prices that would put us at $3.50 per gallon with the Clinton magic touch on gas prices.

  • http://web.mac.com/writecoast/iWeb/Site/Blog/Blog.html Peggy McGilligan

    Hillary offered education, even founded a college: http://theseedsof9-11.com

  • robert108

    History has shown us that the US economy cannot withstand gas over $3 a gallon. Any higher and it becomes recessionary and inflationary.

    What “history” is that? Do you know that the price of gasoline, adjusted for inflation, is virtually the same as it was in the early Seventies?
    I think your claim is false. No single commodity can cause either inflation or recession.

  • robert108

    …she does not understand the MOST BASIC fundamentals of the problem.

    She’s a Dem, and Dems don’t get real economics, as they all believe in Marxist “economics”.

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    The Clintons and their fellow travelers would love to have complete control over energy supplies in this country!

  • http://comcast.net/ Tuna

    This much is clear–left alone, and without the unwavering support ot the MSM (although this comment by herself is so blantantly obtuse, they will ignore it), the SS Inevitable is quite capable of sinking itself. Nevertheless, when you look at the rest of the mutts, you inevitably get the creepy feeling that the D nomination is Hill’s by default–for good or ill.

  • Wolf

    if she gets ellected this country is going to hell

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development