Hezbollah Refuses To Disarm

Sounds to me like if Lebanon can’t uphold its side of the UN cease fire it is time for Israel to resume hostilities and begin whacking Hezbollah fighters again.

TODAY was supposed to be the day when the muchmaligned army of Lebanon took control of its borders and policed the UN ceasefire.
Instead, its military commanders were left humiliated and its troops stranded as Hezbollah told them not to try to disarm its fighters.
The first infantry units were preparing to head south yesterday when Hezbollah demonstrated who exercised the real control by announcing that it had no intention of surrendering a single weapon. General Michel Sleiman, the commander-in-chief of the Lebanese Army, and his lieutenants had been invited to join in Cabinet meetings to finalise plans to deploy their 15,000-strong force in a buffer zone south of the Litani river. However, they ended up being lectured by Hezbollah’s two Cabinet ministers in the coalition Government on what the army could and could not do.
In Beirut, Western diplomats said that it raised serious concerns about the army’s ability and appetite to deal with Hezbollah. The Lebanese Government was left struggling to maintain a united front after unanimously backing the UN resolution on Saturday.
Sami Haddad, the Economics Minister, said: “The Government can’t force Hezbollah to abide by the ceasefire. It’s unnatural to have an armed political party that is in Cabinet and does not abide by what the Government of Lebanon wants.”

Apparently the Lebanese government is going to try and “broker a deal” with Hezbollah, but I don’t see that going anywhere. Hezbollah knows full well that the Lebanese military can’t disarm them, which means that this cease fire is toothless because it can’t be enforced.
If this were a perfect world, Lebanon would ask Israel to back up its military in the endeavor to disarm Hezbollah…but that’s not going to happen.
What Israel should do is give Hezbollah/Lebanon a weak to comply (or at least begin complying) with the cease fire. If they don’t, the IDF should resume hostilities while Israel political leaders point to the cease fire as the worthless waste of time it was.
My only worry – and I think this is pretty likely – is that Hezbollah and Lebanon will come to some sort of an understanding where both sides make a big deal about disarming to fool the bureaucrats at the UN while not really disarming at all.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Bat One

    I wonder if anyone thinks that disarmng the Israelis is going to be any easier than Hezbollah. With the refusal of Hazbollah to disarm or be disarmed, the Israelis are now free to continue with operations south of the Litani River, or to continue onward into the Beka’a Valley to the northeast. In either case, the israeli strategic position becomes all the stronger.

    In addition, anything less than an agressive pursuit of Hezbollah by the IDF, and the stand-in government of Olmert will surely fall and Netanyahu becomes Prime Minister again.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Ken McCracken

    How very different things would be if Sharon were around.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Ken McCracken

    Any moment now, we will have an outpouring of rage from around the world because Hezbollah is refusing to abide by this UN-brokered deal.

    Right?

  • aNONOMISLY

    GREAT observation

  • aNONOMISLY

    Fact: The Lebanese army won’t do anything Hezbollah doesn’t want it to do. Its too weak and has too many Shiites within its rank. Once could even say Hezbollah has control of ~1/3 of it.

    The absolute victor of this entire conflict: IRAN

    Persia delenda est. ..where’s Rodney?, lol

  • brooke

    This “cease-fire’ is nothing more than a breather for Hezbollah… They will be back at it in no-time!

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development