Hero: Senator Tom Coburn Threatening To Force Health Care Bill To Be Read Aloud In The Senate

And given the heft of the several-thousand-page document, as Ed Morrissey points out, the bill would essentially be filibustering itself:

Sen. Tom Coburn, the Oklahoma Republican who developed a close friendship with President Obama when they served together in the Senate, is threatening to have the entire health care bill read on the Senate floor.
Senior Senate Democratic aides had heard Coburn was considering having potentially thousands of pages read aloud in effort to stall passage. “If he did this it would be even outrageous for a guy who’s become known as Dr. No around here,” one of them told POLITICO.
Coburn’s office confirmed that he is indeed thinking about having the bill read.

Supposing just the 1,990 pages of the original bill (and undoubtedly a lot more when you start counting in amendments) and a steady 2 minutes per page rate of reading, it’d take roughly 66 hours to read through the bill.
Given that the Senate typically has other business to attend to, and isn’t likely to stay in session for the 12 hours a day for five days (with about six hours left over for a sixth day) it would take to read this thing the reading itself could stretch into weeks. And if Republicans insist on the bill being read aloud again if there are changes or amendments, we’re talking about months of delay.
And yeah, that would totally be a publicity stunt. But it would be a stunt that would at least slow the progress of this bill down enough so that the American public could get a handle on what it would do to the way they get health care. And, you know, let the Senators being asked to vote on it time to actually read it for themselves too.
Remember that our founding fathers devised a government that would move slowly, and act only with broad consensus. What Democrats are trying to do on health care is the exact opposite of that.
Good on Republicans for at least trying to foil their efforts.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array sayanything-9974

    Aren’t you a whiney be-otch. I guess that also only works one way for Dem/Libs. The Dems don’t need a single vote pass that crap or shut the F*ck up. The guy that calls every dissenting opinion whiney is the biggest cry baby loser of them all.

  • TheTodd (now with child!)

    To quote Rob Port:

    #1) Let (them) filibuster their hearts out for a few weeks. It will get them loads of negative press and make them look like the babies they are to the American people.
    #2) Eventually change the rules to an up or down vote.

    http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/fargo_forum_blasts_dems_on_filibuster_issue/

  • lock’m'up

    What if they read it and not all the Republican senators sat there and listened?

    That would just make the rest of America aware of the amount of obstructionist hypocrisy available from the “conservatives”.

    I say, do it.

  • jimmypop

    oooo…

    im going to make you read it out loud….

    oooo…

    remember the empty gop threats of ‘im gonna filibuster!’ dont tell us, ‘oooo, im so mad i might just do it! i might just! you know, do it!’ JUST SHUT UP AND DO IT!

    the gop tools dont want to sit around either. they have, like their liberal pals, have better things to do….. like money to launder, fake loans to coordinate, coke to snort and whores to do.

    they need to stop wasting our time with phony posturing and do something that does not make their conservative base walk even further away from them. like….oh, i dont know….. be conservative and stop playing nice-nice with the left.

  • TheTodd (now with child!)

    “You do know we’re not talking about a literal filibuster here, right? Like, not the actual procedural move?”

    Yes.

  • sayanything-4416

    The obstruction of the nihilistic republicans has shattered all records, even for minor appointments.

    In 1949, a change to Senate rules allowed members to filibuster executive branch nominees. Senators tend to believe (or at least to say) that, within bounds of decency, the White House deserves to be able to staff the executive branch as it chooses; and in the 60 years since then, the practice has been used sparingly.

    Until Barack Obama came to town.

    “Between 1949 and 2009 there were 24 nominees on which cloture was forced,” Baker said. “In just the first 9 months of the Obama administration, there have been five such votes.”

    During the George W. Bush administration, Baker notes, there were seven such votes.

    Awful people. Simply the worst kind of immature jerks on the planet.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    You do know we’re not talking about a literal filibuster here, right? Like, not the actual procedural move?

    Probably not, because you’re kind of dumb.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I don’t think that’s very fair aimed at someone like Coburn, who is actually one of the good guys.

    I don’t necessarily disagree with the overall sentiment, but you might want to take a deep breath and consider the situation a bit more.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    The point is to slow down proceedings.

    Why are you liberals so afraid to actually let people read and scrutinize the bill? If this is so wonderful for America, if it’s all rainbows and unicorns as we’re being led to believe, then it should be no sweat right?

    I’m all for obstructionism. For most problems, the best thing the government can do is nothing.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development