Herman Cain On Anita Hill: “Is She Going To Endorse Me?”

You gotta love a guy who can keep his sense of humor, even amid scandal.

While on the campaign trail in Michigan on Thursday, Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain laughed along with a voter who joked about his having the support of Anita Hill. In 1991, Hill made sexual harassment accusations against then Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas during his confirmation hearings.

Like Thomas then, Cain finds himself fighting harassment accusations, which he flatly denies and says are an attempt to ruin him politically. Comparisons between Thomas and Cain have been made since the allegations against the former CEO of Godfather’s Pizza surfaced in the media last week. …

The audio available shows a person in the crowd first bringing up the subject, asking Cain if he had heard “the latest news today” about Hill. While the whole question is inaudible in the video, Cain responded, “Is she going to endorse me?” to the raucous laughter of those present.

This is why, despite the media dwelling on the allegations of sexual harassment against Cain, he doesn’t seem to be fading in the polls.

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters. He writes a weekly column for several North Dakota newspapers, and also serves as a policy fellow for the North Dakota Policy Council.

Related posts

  • http://nofreelunch.areavoices.com/ Kevin Flanagan

    I can hear the media morons clucking over this.

  • Neiman

    Why hasn’t there been at least some minor dip in the poll numbers? While not willing to convict Cain based solely on accusations, surely with several accusers, a moral people would be concerned that there might be some degree of truth in the allegations that would cause them to be wary that they not put another sexual predator in the White House. Have JFK, Billy Jeff and many others so lowered our revulsion at sexual immorality that it no longer registers even to a small degree on the moral register of a once moral people?

    I am waiting to see what happens, not willing to presume guilt, but I am concerned there may be some degree of truth to the stories and want to take a wait and see attitude, not committing myself to his support until more facts are forthcoming; but it seems for most conservatives there is no moral concerns at all.

    • Cherz1967

      It has nothing to do with morality you dolt.  He was falsely accused.  Get it? Falsely.  If you cannot see the connection between Chicago and the accusers you should open your eyes a bit wider.

      Have you ever heard of the story of the boy who cried wolf?  The dems have cried wolf one to many times, now no one believes them.

      • Neiman

        1. How do you absolutely know he was falsely accused? Please give us the documented, objective evidence that he never engaged in any inappropriate sexual behavior. Doesn’t the fact that there are several accusers, not conspirators, making the accusations give some possible credence to the charges?

        2. If he is guilty, they were immoral acts and I am simply suggesting that a moral people, at least to some small degree, I believe in times past, would back off their support a bit in the polls taking a wait and see attitude.

        3. Yes, the lying Left is involved, yes they make wild accusations about every conservative and that is their pattern of behavior, my suggestion was that I was surprised a moral people did not seem the slightest concerned there might be some truth to the stories.

        • HG

          1.  How do you know he has?  What about Cain makes you think he’s lying?  What about the accusers makes you think they’re telling the truth?

          2.  If he’s innocent, which is very likely, he ought to have the nominee given his positions and the class and integrity with which he handles the allegations.

          3.Moral people recognize Cain’s candid response and his manners as a sign of moral strength.  It’s hard to believe he did this.  It’s easy to believe it’s a character assasination attempt and nothing more. 

          • Neiman

            Like most Conservatives, you just don’t get it! It isn’t about absolute
            guilt or innocence, my comments have been limited to one factor: It
            seems to me that the moral America I once knew, would at least have
            produced some minor dip in the polls that reflected some degree of
            concern that there might be some small degree of truth involved. I am
            suggesting the lack of even a minor dip concerns me that we as Americans
            no longer view sexual escapades, criminal or otherwise, as being a
            great matter of concern as long as the candidate seems genuinely
            conservative.

            It is only your opinion that moral people recognize these things about Cain as supporting his denials, I disagree, I think it is an absence of any moral foundations any longer existing that such accusations would not have produced at least a small, temporary dip in the poll numbers. As it is, conservatives/GOPers, didn’t even display the most minor, knee jerk, negative reaction to the accusations, which is unnatural among a truly moral people.

          • HG

            Or evidence of integrity.  I tend to think Cain supporters are upstanding people.

          • Game

            “How do you know he has?  What about Cain makes you think he’s lying?”

            When Herman Cain ran for Senate in 2003, he disclosed to his campaign team that he had been accused of Sexual Harassment and that his employer had paid the women to shut up, but when he ran for President in 2011, he claimed he did not remember it? Then he later claimed he remembered it but did not know about a payout? Then he claimed he know about the payout was about a month or two salary? Then he claimed it was a years salary? And why is it that he keeps saying this is part of the “Democrat machine”  and then later saying that it was the Rick Perry Campaign? Even if you think he is not guilty, the fact is the guy is lying his ass off.

          • HG

            That isn’t even close to correct. 

          • Game

            Really, what is wrong? Do you want youtube clips or something. Man you are in love with the Cain flavored Kool-aid.

          • HG

            Is this HanniLarryEdWillGuestHal?

          • 2hotel9

            Poor tranni, it pisses itself when any Negro looks at it, much less shows moral and intellectual superiority to it.

          • 2hotel9

            Really? How about you prove that.

          • Game
          • HG

            The daily show?  that’s your source?

          • Game

            One of three, but if you can’t defend the message, attack the messenger.

          • HG

            One of Two.  And the only link that worked.

          • 2hotel9

            So, you have no proof, yet again.

          • HG

            Unbelievable.  It must be Hanni.

          • 2hotel9

            We need to coin a new phrase for multiple suckpuppetry.  I know! We could call it “trannitizing”!!!

          • Game

            Just admit you don’t care about the truth, and no matter what I show you, the truth will never matter. You are just in love with Cain and you hate Obama, so no matter how big of a pervert or liar that Cain is, you will follow him!

          • 2hotel9

            tranni, you have yet to provide any “truth”, ever, at this blog. You simply spew lies and sh*t.

          • Game

            Are you by chance employed at Penn state?

          • 2hotel9

            tranni has defended child molesters in the past here, so I would not doubt him doing it again.

          • Game

            Huh?

          • 2hotel9

            Don’t sweat it, tranni! You can be as many different people as you want on Algore’s intertubes thingie.

          • 2hotel9

            And what is really sad is your virulent racism is so common among Democrats.

        • robert108

          Even with such obvious politically-motivated accusations, the burden of proof is on the accuser, and they have presented nothing.  The fact that their accusations are escalating shows how phony they are.  They thought accusations of “harrassment” would do the trick, but when that didn’t work, they jacked it up to actual assault.  Ann Coulter has a very good analysis of what is really going on here.

    • HG

      That’s just it Neiman, there are no facts nor will there be any.  It’s a he said, she said scenerio.  Cain hasn’t given anyone reason to question his credibility.  There is enough known of the way this thingh has played out to discern that it is very, very likely that Cain is telling the truth.

      • SigFan

        Coulter did a nice job of tying all these accusers into Axelrod and Chicago in her latest article.  Also there was an article on RCP or Drudge where voice analysis experts claim that Cain is being truthful and Bialek is not. 

        The truth is we may never know with absolute certainty what did or did not happen.  Given past history of Democrats smearing people this way and Cain’s long career I have to go with his claim at this point.  Show solid evidence to the contrary and I will be among the first to reject him.  Lacking that, I will take him at his word.

        • HG

          I too take him at his word.  Given the way this played out, that is a not hard to do.

      • Neiman

        Like most Conservatives, you just don’t get it! It isn’t about absolute guilt or innocence, my comments have been limited to one factor: It seems to me that the moral America I once knew, would at least have produced some minor dip in the polls that reflected some degree of concern that there might be some small degree of truth involved. I am suggesting the lack of even a minor dip concerns me that we as Americans no longer view sexual escapades, criminal or otherwise, as being a great matter of concern as long as the candidate seems genuinely conservative.

        • robert108

          There you go, smearing conservatives again.  If you are interested in the facts, and not just running your anger as usual, check this out:  http://patdollard.com/2011/11/bialek-deconstructed-accustations-quickly-erode-under-scrutiny/

          • Neiman

            Go way, grow up and please see a psychiatrist! Your lies are getting boring.

          • robert108

            As usual, you are unconcerned with the facts, and are just running your anger.

          • Neiman

            Little boy Robbie, I am not angry, I seldom get angry at anything or anyone, I am just weary of your juvenile, psychotic responses to my every written utterance. Go away, grow up for Heaven’s sake and get urgent psychiatric counseling  for your own sake.

          • HG

            Exactly.  Great link.

        • HG

          If in an election cycle, all it takes is allegations to sink a candidate in the polls, then we are a fickle and easily manipulated electorate.  I look at the stable support for Cain as a good sign.  Cain’s supporters handled the situation correctly.

          • Neiman

            Your worship of Cain is of absolutely no interest to me. I have stated my case ad nausea regarding why I expressed concerns about this matter of the polls as it relates to our national moral collapse. You are free to disagree, but when it comes to the Christian faith and morality, while I take your expression of faith seriously, we virtually never agree about such matters and this is no exception.

            The more passionate people get about leaders, celebrities from sports stars to presidents or even nationally known ministers, the more my concerns grow about the moral, spiritual health of our nation. When we stop questioning and blindly support anyone, I know one absolute truth: They cannot be people of God, they cannot have life in them. Why? No one that walks with Christ will be nor can be loved by many people, cannot be spoken well of by masses of people, as having His Spirit within will cause the world to hate them, as they hated Him, they will hate His disciples/children. Not that any Christian should look for perfect men for such offices, as they must all have made some compromises with the devil to get that far, but surely, Christians would have, by the polls, expressed some small degree of concern about the nature of the charges if any faith was left in America. But as Jesus rhetorically asked, about whether or not He would find any faith on earth when He returned, the answer is no, He will not.

          • HG

            Okay Neiman.  I’m regretting even replying after that comment. 

          • Neiman

            A. Maybe it is because you never replied to my actual, clearly expressed concerns about how conservatives responded, only launched into a defense of Cain.The thread above about his dip in the polls supports my contention that a moral people absolutely would have some minor degree of moral revulsion to the nature of the accusations, even if rejecting them as being true.
            B. I know that any defense of the faith or morality of a Christian foundation upsets you, as we never agree on these issues at all. Which does not imply any doubts about your expressions of faith.

          • robert108

            Christian morality demands that we stand up for the truth, and reject the false accuser, regardless of our feelings. You should try that some time.

          • Neiman

            A. You know little of Christian morality with your constant lies and unreasoning rage.
            B. You need to try growing up and see a psychiatrist ASAP.
            C.  You need to stop obsessing with my every written utterance.

          • robert108

            Nobody here is “worshipping” Cain, so you’re making another of your false accusations to smear a conservative.  You have been very persistent in trying to smear Cain, even in the face of evidence that at least one of his accusers is a liar. http://patdollard.com/2011/11/bialek-deconstructed-accustations-quickly-erode-under-scrutiny/
            It is evidence of morality that we defend someone falsely accused for craven political purposes.

  • http://flamemeister.com flamemeister

    Cain’s accusers might have more cred if they could take off their pointy-topped, body-fluid-stained bedsheets.

  • HG

    He’s not fading in the polls because he has handled these allegations with class and integrity.  It’s becoming clear that the allegations against him aren’t going to stick.

    http://hg.sayanythingblog.com/2011/11/11/what-about-cains-credibility/

    • Neiman

      Sorry, I disagree with you about why he is not fading in the polls. it seems to me that most on the Right no longer recoil at sexual indiscretions, as has been the attitude of the Left for many decades.

      What will you do if more accusers arise and it becomes apparent there is something to these accusations? You are wedded to Cain now, will you go down with the ship?

      As I have said elsewhere, it is not the truth or lack thereof of these accusations that bothers me, he may be wholly innocent as he claims, although I have some small doubts; but, to me, if we remained a truly God fearing, moral people, IMO, the polls would have reflected at least some minor concern just over the accusations.

      • HG

        Sure we do Neiman, but we recoil at character assasination that not only threatens Cain’s candidacy, but his life’s work — his marriage, integrity, character, and legacy.  I’m not afraid of being wrong about Cain, but based on everything I’ve seen, that wont’ be the case here.  A moral, God-fearing people won’t stand for the crap that is being pulled on Cain.  There is nothing here that should prevent support for Cain whatsoever.

        • Neiman

          It is only your opinion that moral people recognize these things about
          Cain as supporting his denials, I disagree, I think it is an absence of
          any moral foundations any longer existing that such accusations would
          not have produced at least a small, temporary dip in the poll numbers.
          As it is, conservatives/GOPers, didn’t even display the most minor, knee
          jerk, negative reaction to the accusations, which is unnatural among a
          truly moral people to accusations of sexual immorality.

          “his life’s work — his marriage, integrity, character, and legacy.” If something arises that proves or at least substantiates these claims to some minor degree, all of that was smoke and mirrors,wasn’t it? On the other hand, if survives them all, gets nominated and elected and then like Billy Jeff shows he is a just another lust filled POTUS, then it will be too late, won’t it? On the third hand, yes I keep a spare around, he may be all you have said, he may be the GOP Messiah figure, as pure as the driven snow and these may all be cold hearted, liberal lies, he may be another Justice Thomas, in which case I hope he prevails; but as I have suggested ad nausea, my only point was not guilt or innocence, not about the character of Cain or his accusers or their puppet masters, if they exist; I simply noted that it was a matter of concern to me that there was not the most minor, temporary dip, as among a moral people, just the accusations of sexual immorality should produce some revulsion, among some so-called Christian Conservatives and that the lack of such a downward tick in the polls seems to me to reflect a complete moral delusion has swept this land.

  • 2hotel9

    Anita should endorse Cain, seeing as he is an authentic “African American” running for US President. Oh, yea, Herman refuses to allow that false label to be applied to him, he is simply an American. Anita will never support him as long as he refuses to submit to her idiotic, leftist ideology.

  • Neiman

    News Story for you Cainites: “Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich says
    rival Herman Cain has handled the sexual harassment allegations against
    him well so far. But Gingrich is unsure what would happen if more
    accusations surface. Gingrich, a former GOP House speaker, says Cain seems to have satisfied most people so far by his explanations. Cain has denied accusations from four women about alleged incidents a decade ago.

    • 2hotel9

      So, is it his skin color or his intelligence that pisses you off  the most?

      • Neiman

        I am not “pissed off” about anything at all, nor am I against Cain. The quotation by Gingrich was in Cain’s favor, so as often happens, you are over reacting emotionally and in error on this point.

        • 2hotel9

          No, you are the one who has been pissed off about Cain for quite some time. So, why?

          • Neiman

            2H9:
            (1) That is wholly your subjective opinion, not based upon objective fact.
            (2) I have solely expressed my non-specific, inner concerns about him, even to his best supporter and my highly respected friend BatOne, but that does not mean I am against him, just wary of him. I am not even sure why, just something in my spirit that has caused me to push away from him a bit.
            (3) You should know by know that, most often when I express concerns or raise questions, they are, if I have chosen the right word, esoteric in nature, meaning to me: Not always easy to understand by others, of special interest to me and I hope to a few other Christians, which more often than not sometimes alienates me, even from other Christians. As regarding Cain today, it was about the failure to see any dip in the poll numbers, based on the immoral nature of the accusations (not there being factual) and my concerns how that reflected on the morality of the Right. This has been offset in some measure today in a more recent thread, showing that minor dip in approval I expected.

          • 2hotel9

            You have been pissed off about Cain since he entered the primary process, your comments have made that clear from the start. I just want to know why.

          • Neiman

            Twice now I have rejected that erroneous characterization and offered you civilly and reasonably an explanation of my position. If that is not sufficient, it is not my problem, but yours.

          • 2hotel9

            I am being civil. I just want to know why you are pissed off about Cain being in the primary. Thats all.

          • Neiman

            A. I AM NOT PISSED OFF ABOUT CAIN OR ANYTHING ELSE!
            B. No matter how many times you make that charge, it will remain untrue.
            C. I already explained above my reasons for concern.
            D. I never accused you of being uncivil, that is another false accusation.

          • 2hotel9

            So, you are just angry that Cain refuses to drop out. OK.

          • Neiman

            I cannot decide if you are simply grossly obtuse or playing games to start a fight.

            I have denied any anger of any kind about Cain or anything/anyone, why can’t you understand something so simple?

            I neither support nor oppose Cain, my concerns about hi, are more subtle and spiritual in nature and unable to be articulated in a manner that you could appreciate or understand. The best I can offer you is that I have reservations, which is my right and which I defend.

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            Hi Old Pal, how’s your day going so far?
            Making new friends?

          • Neiman

            Well Gay Bob, I see you have climbed out of hell today to do more evil in your father Satan’s name and drag more souls into hell with you, which tasks make you happy I see.

            I am not looking for friends nor approval. My Lord had/has few friends, He said he came to set even neighbor against neighbor and family members against each other, because the world (you) have rejected Him. He also said as the world (you) hated Him, they (you) would hate His children (me). It is not a popularity contest Gay Bob, it is about reproving self-condemned souls (like you) of their sins and by the Spirit leading the few that are willing to Jesus for Salvation and healing. Many (whole world) are called to Salvation in Christ Jesus by God’s Grace, few (a tiny minority) are chosen (brought to Salvation). So it is not a popularity contest, it is not about gaining the approval of the world (you) for what I believe or for my actions, it is about Salvation which you have rejected and of peace with God through the Jesus.

            Now unless you are ready to repent and ask Jesus to be your only Savior and only Lord, we have nothing to discuss at all today. You may go about your business of lying souls into hell.

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            Old Pal is that the same Lord who said this:
            Matthew 5:43-48

            Why so much hate, Old Pal?

          • Neiman

            Now unless you are ready to repent and ask Jesus to be your only Savior
            and only Lord, we have nothing to discuss at all today. You may go about
            your business of lying souls into hell.

          • 2hotel9

            Wesettled this, you are angry that Cain is in the primary, no reason specified.

          • Neiman

            Okay, we answered this, you are both grossly obtuse and trying to start a fight over absolutely nothing at all. It is too bad that is how you entertain yourself, it is too bad you must base it on lies you created and which have been categorically denied.

            You are better than this nonsense!

          • robert108

            Your denials are obvious lies.  Your anger is well-known and widely recognized here.  Try to be honest, Anonymous.

          • Neiman

            Grow up, get psychiatric help ASAP!  Anger is subjective and I am rarely angry about anything at all, it is just that reproving others of sin and being a child of God telling the Truth is most often viewed as anger, because no one likes hearing the Truth, especially about their sins.

            Read of John the Baptist and his words crying out (shouting) in the wilderness demanding people repent of their sins, calling the religious leaders snakes, cursing Herod and Herodias, the people said he was angry and he was, it was righteous anger against sin and people like you beheaded him for his anger against their sins. Jesus called Peter a devil, he called the religious leaders snakes, liars, false prophets and murderers, he beat “capitalists” in the Temple with a whip of cords, which tears away the flesh and He turned over their tables, all in righteous anger against their sins and they, the world (you) crucified Him.

            Think of a parent raising their voices in anger at a child that is rebellious and doing things harmful to themselves and others. For some time the child hates their parents, thinks they are unfair, because they know they are wrong and none of us like being faced with our offenses and shortcomings. It is all anger, but anger expressed in love.

            If I am ever angry it is at sin, first in myself and then the world, in the first case because it separates me from intimate fellowship with God for a season, thus that alone makes sin hateful. In the latter case, because it separates the unrepentant from God forever and results in their everlasting punishing, which fate must be hateful to any child of God.  Yet, except for sin I reject the idea I am, but rarely angry at anyone or anything. It is like your labeling every disagreement with you as lies, any speaking against sin or against what you hold as a truth, you will like a child always define as anger, while like a parent if it is anger, it is based on true love or most often, not anger at all. It is all in the eye of the beholder.

            Lastly, it will save you time and energy if you realize I am not concerned about how you react, as that is not my responsibility. Plus, your lies and accusations fall on deaf ears, I know and consider the quite faulty source.

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            No Old Pal, most of what you write is hateful and angry.

          • Neiman

            Now unless you are ready to repent and ask Jesus to be your only Savior and only Lord, we have nothing to discuss at all today. You may go about your business of lying souls into hell.

            You’ll pardon me I am sure, if I choose not to value the opinion of a self-confessed non-Christian like yourself and one that is self-condemned as well, right?

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            I’ll say a prayer for you, Old Pal.
            The hate you harbor can only lead down one road.

          • Neiman

            I have told you Gay Bob, since you are not a Christian, by your own confession and Almighty God does not hear the prayers of sinners, except in repentance; I do not want you praying for me to your pig god, your father, the Prince of Darkness.

            The only road I am on is the Christian Road, safe in my Salvation, whilst by your rejection of Christ, you are self condemned.

            Please keep accusing me of hate, I am so happy, as like my Father in Heaven the only thing I hate is sin and so to say I hate is a badge of honor, it means I am led by the Spirit in hating sin. Now go away, your games are already getting boring and your father in hell is calling you.

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            Why do you lie so much, Old Pal. Does your god have a lie per day bonus?
            You’ve already told us how much you hate.

            Neiman 95p · 17 minutes ago

             

            Remember, you started this Old Gary Racist Muslim Bob, I
            just hate socialist Americans, you know Democrats, Liberals, those God hating
            folk.

          • Neiman

            What lies are those Gay Bob? State them and prove they are lies.

            I am amazed how much you and 108 are exactly alike!

          • Neiman

            I hate sin and its destructive impact does make me angry, same thing with God:

            1. God is love and His law reflects that love, but sin is the total opposite,
            reflecting the selfishness and evil of the devil. “Those who sin are opposed to the law of God, for all sin opposes the
            law of God… But when people keep on sinning, it shows they belong to
            the Devil, who has been sinning since the beginning. But the Son of God
            came to destroy these works of the Devil” (1 John 3:4, 8, New Living Translation).

            2. Sin enslaves us. “Jesus answered them, ‘Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits
            sin is a slave of sin'” (John 8:34).

            3. Sin leads to death. “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in
            Christ Jesus our Lord” (Romans 6:23).

            Does God hate anyone? The answer is yes.
            Psalm 5:5, “The boastful shall not stand before Thine eyes; Thou dost hate all who do iniquity,” Psalm 11:5, “The Lord tests the righteous and the wicked, and the one who loves violence His soul hates.” Lev. 20:23,
            “Moreover, you shall not follow the customs of the nation which I shall
            drive out before you, for they did all these things, and therefore I have abhorred them.” Prov. 6:16-19, “There are six things which the Lord hates, yes, seven which are an abomination to Him: Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, A heart that devises wicked plans, feet that run rapidly to evil, A false witness who utters lies, and one who spreads strife among brothers.” Hosea 9:15, “All their evil is at Gilgal; indeed, I came to hate them there!
            Because of the wickedness of their deeds I will drive them out of My
            house! I will love them no more; All their princes are rebels.”
            Are
            these verses hard to read? Do they make you feel uncomfortable? They
            should. God hates sin. But, He does not punish sin. He punishes the
            sinner. Sin cannot be tied up and thrown into a fire. It cannot be put
            in a box or glued to a stick. It is rebellion. It is rebellion in the
            heart. It is breaking God’s Law. Sin occurs inside the heart and mind of
            people. Therefore, God must punish the sinner. Why? Because He is both
            Holy and Just and the person who sins offends God. God’s Holy and Just
            character will not allow Him to ignore this offense.

            Has God changed because of Grace? In Him there is shadows or variableness of turning, His yes is not no and His no is not yes. As I have pointed out before, His hatred of sin and certain types of sinners is also noted in the New Testament, the only difference is that in Christ Jesus He punished Him for every sin or every human being that would ever live. Why? He hates sin, His anger rages against all sin, so He expressed the wrath we deserve against His own Son. Thereby, He could offer His Salvation to “whosoever” will, most blessed all-inclusive term, but it requires the person see a need for that Salvation – that is repentance and then sincerely accept Jesus as His Savior and Lord. All that reject salvation on this ground are self-condemned, a course you have chosen by rejecting Jesus.

            So, as my anger is only against sin, my hatred is only of sin, your charges of anger or hate are not taken as an insult, but rather a badge of honor, as it means I am God’s Son, imitating Him in His hatred or and anger at sin. So please keep those accusations coming, they do not upset me at all.

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            The real Jesus said:
            43Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.  44But
            I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good
            to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and
            persecute you;

            I love you Neiman, do you love me?

          • Neiman

            Gay Bob, you make me tired.

            You are incapable of love of any kind, at best you can offer those that would want it your vile affections and friendship, but outside of Christ Jesus there is no love and by your own confession you are outside of Christ. I do not want your gay love.

            You do not understand Scripture, as you have not the Spirit of Christ, as by your own admission you are not a Christian. This passage does NOT mean what you think it means, but I will not waste time explaining it to you as Jesus said, such as you only take His Pearls of Divine Wisdom, in your father Satan’s name you then only turn and attack the person offering you that Wisdom. Repent, accept Jesus as your Savior and then we’ll talk.

            Do you want to know if I love you? Really? Then give me the name or names your pig god goes by and the church he/she represents FIRST. You lie when you say you have, the name god is generic, it must be tied to a specific deity and/or religion to have any meaning and that includes a name. So you FIRST!

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            Old Pal, there is only one God.

          • Neiman

            I agree, but give me the name he/she goes by and what religion he/she represents. You know Muslims say there is only one god – Allah, is that your god? Mormon’s too, is that your god? Feminists have their own too (GAIAH), is that your god?

            You cannot mean Almighty God of the Holy Bible, as there is no way to know Him or to His Salvation except by faith in Jesus Christ as your only Savior and Lord; and you are, by your own admission, no Christian, so it cannot possibly be that Almighty God.

            Stop obfuscating and tell us exactly what god you serve and what religion he/she represents. I know you won’t, you have to keep playing these demonic games, because your only god is the Prince of Hell.

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            If Old Pal, you chose not to follow the real Jesus’ second greatest commandment, just say so. I will understand you. I forgive you, Old Pal.

          • Neiman

            While you are trying to make-up a name for your pig god, tell me what good would it do for your everlasting conscious soul if you obeyed His every word perfectly? No one ever has, but would it save you if you did? No, only faith in Christ and being Born Again can save anyone? Would it please God if you obeyed Him in these things? No, as no matter how perfectly you did, you are still lost and headed for hell without being Born Again. So, if either of us obeyed them perfectly, which is God’s Holy Standard, what good would it do either of us?

            No, like the name of your pig god, I do not expect an answer, not a clear and direct answer, but maybe you should at least ask yourself these questions.

          • robert108

            You’re always angry, Anonymous.  You vomit your anger at everyone on this blog, and half the time you use God as an excuse for angering on people.  You are a liar and a hypocrite, as well as being a conservative-bashing liberal.  Your continuing sickness of denial is noted.

          • Neiman

            You’ll forgive me, I am sure, if I reject the biased opinion of a known liar and non-Christian like yourself on such matters, right?

            Please grow up! Please get to a psychiatrist ASAP, not for my sake – but for your own

          • robert108

            Like a liberal, when you have no facts, you try personal attack.  Now, you’re trying to pose as a psychiatrist.  For your own sake, Anonymous, try to be honest.

          • Neiman

            More real lies from a resident pathological liar -you.

            I am a conservative, I am just not a fringe Right Wing Crazy conservative like you.  I am no liberal! People can be true conservatives and not adhere to you particular conservative views or probably more accurately the harsh, mean-spirited ways you want to communicate and implement conservative values.

            I never posed as a psychiatrist, I simply suggested you see one ASAP as I suspect you are clinically insane.

            I offer facts here all the time, you reply 100% emotionally.

            Three strikes you are out. Now grow up!

          • robert108

            There you go again, liar; bashing conservatives and denying your crazy anger.  My smacking you with the truth makes you flip your lid, so you might try some anger management therapy.
            You remain fact-free and lying up a storm to protect your bloated ego.

          • Neiman

            You have no relationship with the truth.You proved no lies on my part, you only acted like a spoiled child. Now go away, you no longer amuse me!

  • robert108

    I see Anonymous is still having the same tantrum as always.  

Top