Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, June 30, 2008

Here Comes Obama’s Flip-Flop On Iraq

This is from The New Yorker, not exactly a bastion of anti-Obama sympathies:

In February, 2007, when Barack Obama declared that he was running for President, violence in Iraq had reached apocalyptic levels, and he based his candidacy, in part, on a bold promise to begin a rapid withdrawal of American forces upon taking office. At the time, this pledge represented conventional thinking among Democrats and was guaranteed to play well with primary voters. But in the year and a half since then two improbable, though not unforeseeable, events have occurred: Obama has won the Democratic nomination, and Iraq, despite myriad crises, has begun to stabilize. With the general election four months away, Obama’s rhetoric on the topic now seems outdated and out of touch, and the nominee-apparent may have a political problem concerning the very issue that did so much to bring him this far.

If Obama’s getting that from the most liberal of media publication how in the world can he stick to his defeatist guns on Iraq?

Discussion question: If Obama and the rest of the Democrats who declared Iraq a loss years ago didn’t have the foresight to see that we could, in fact, be successful isn’t that an indication of poor leadership qualities.

Comments

Avatar for Hannitized

If Obama and the rest of the Democrats who declared Iraq a loss years ago didn’t have the foresight to see that we could, in fact, be successful isn’t that an indication of poor leadership qualities.

No.

I am a Democrat and I supported the surge.  I disagreed with Obama’s position about the surge but I respected their opinion that perhaps I was wrong and they were right....again.

If that is an indication of poor leadership than Bush should have been thrown out on his ear for his extremely consistent and pathetic indications of poor leadership.

Decisions in war are made, some good some not so good.  But you can’t have it both ways.  You can’t on one had say that Bush’s mistakes in judgement were acceptable, but his opponents are not.

Using your conditions for judgement would favor Obama anyway, he was against the initial invasion. 

That is a loosing battle for you McCain and all of the hawks.  We don’t even know what the end result in Iraq will be.

Cmon now.

Hannitized on June 30, 2008 at 08:15 pm
Avatar for Bullwinkle

He was against the was from the start?

Bullshit!  He said he didn’t know how he might have voted, if he could have voted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbO-kgB-ZI4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU6NiMEaHko&feature=related

Try the truth just once Handjob. It’ll end your long standing streak of lying your totally useless ass off.

Bullwinkle on June 30, 2008 at 10:05 pm
Avatar for Ken

In some ways I have to agree with Hannitized. The same lack of foresight can be attributed to Bush as well. The administration overlooked the likely possibility of an insurgency and failed to plan appropriately in the early stages of the war. Foresight is definitely a leadership quality, but no leader is infallible. That being said, I still think Obama would be a terrible leader.

Ken on June 30, 2008 at 10:23 pm
Avatar for Hannitized

He was against the was from the start?

Yes, he gave speeches in 2002 opposing the war and the rush to it.  What more do you need?

Bullshit!  He said he didn’t know how he might have voted, if he could have voted.

After his many speeches opposing the war, there came a time much later, where he was asked what he might vote if he was privied to information he hadn’t seen.  His response was that he didn’t know.  How is that a contradiction?  It’s not.

Nice try though. 

Where was my lie?????

Hannitized on July 1, 2008 at 12:33 am
Avatar for Bullwinkle

That would have been “he was against the war AT the start” not from the start. You asked, I showed you. He is just like you, willing to tell any lie to support an agenda that is otherwise unsupportable. In other words, a parasitic, dishonest liberal.

Youd have a hard time convincing me he’s either for or against anything other than higher taxes and Marxism. You’d have a hard time convincing me you are one bit different from him.

Bullwinkle on July 1, 2008 at 03:12 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.