Normalizing Pedophilia

Decadence is on the march! And now, a defense of pedophilia as just another “sexual orientation” has been published in the mainstream left wing UK newspaper The Guardian. From, “Paedophilia: Bringing Dark Desires Into the Light:”

Paedophiles may be wired differently. This is radical stuff. But there is a growing conviction, notably in Canada, that paedophilia should probably be classified as a distinct sexual orientation, like heterosexuality or homosexuality. Two eminent researchers testified to that effect to a Canadian parliamentary commission last year, and the Harvard Mental Health Letter of July 2010 stated baldly that paedophilia “is a sexual orientation” and therefore “unlikely to change”.

This isn’t news. We already know that those who abuse children sexually are always dangerous. That is why they must register with the police when released from prison.

Understanding causes is one thing–I’m all for it–but the effort is definitely underway to normalize the behavior:

The reclassification of paedophilia as a sexual orientation would, however, play into what Goode calls “the sexual liberation discourse”, which has existed since the 1970s. “There are a lot of people,” she says, “who say: we outlawed homosexuality, and we were wrong. Perhaps we’re wrong about paedophilia.”

Social perceptions do change. Child brides were once the norm; in the late 16th century the age of consent in England was 10. More recently, campaigning organisations of the 70s and 80s such as the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) and Paedophile Action for Liberation were active members of the NCCL when it made its parliamentary submission questioning the lasting damage caused by consensual paedophilic relations… A Dutch study published in 1987 found that a sample of boys in paedophilic relationships felt positively about them. And a major if still controversial 1998-2000 meta-study suggests – as J Michael Bailey of Northwestern University, Chicago, says – that such relationships, entered into voluntarily, are “nearly uncorrelated with undesirable outcomes”.


LegitSlater is a contributor who focuses on features primarily pertaining to state and local government as well as political parties, but has been known to dabble in other areas. LegitSlater has also been known to pinch hit for Rob when he is out and about in his worldly travels, or attending the occasional Yankees-Twins series. LegitSlater's numerous awards include the personal satisfaction received from informing the vast readership of SAB, spurring respectful debate, and hunting the trophy sacred cows which have been otherwise deemed off limits by the traditional media, elected officials, and the political parties.

Related posts

  • slackwarerobert

    Why no cross referencing with Greece? With all their financial problems they classified pedophiles as a disability so you get a government check. They actually PAY pedophiles to molest children.

    But let me follow this “logic” If I like to sleep with kids it is OK, but if I sleep with a vigin little girl to cure my aids it would not be?
    Just let the little tikes carry guns, and they can shoot the pedophile, and let them argue with god if it is a disease.

    • Onslaught1066

      Must not get as much as welfare recipients get in Stockton or else Ellin-A$$ would not live there.

    • $8194357

      Send them all to Greece !

  • RCND

    Sick. No other words needed

  • Neiman

    Most Christians knew that the sexual revolution of the Sixties with the normalization of homosexuality would eventually include normalizing pedophilia. Once you can do one wicked thing, usually quite harmless appearing, society can and will do another more gross thing, one after another until they fall into absolute moral depravity. Well, an example would be America.

    • $8194357


  • HG

    This is insane. Can’t even imagine this ever being considered, but then again, never thought homosexuality would be considered “normal” by so many either. This is just getting downright ridiculous. The sexual revolution has left decadence and depravity in its wake. Society is suffering the consequences of it.
    You can pretend that society is better off without socially conservative boundaries which protect the foundations of society, or you can just take a look around. It’s not working.

  • sbark

    Jerry Sandusky got “screwed”………turns out he was just a martyr before his “time”.

    ……and after pediofila, what is next for the left… with animals?…..nope already done that with Teddy Kennedy, Garry Studs and Clinton…..

  • $8194357

    Dang those critical therory anti Christian marxist think tanks
    bore alot of false moral fruit ,huh…Attack…attack…attack.
    Young against old, men against women, races against whitey,
    perverse sexuallity normalized….
    Every dang cause/group radicalized and mainstreamed to tear
    down a Biblical moral “rule of law” society with false morality…
    Satan had their “collective” ears and hearts, huh…..
    And CBS is all a twitter over the sexist comments about the good looking
    lady at the football game…Facist feminists keeping the males accountable
    to the new bulley pulpit (mass media propagandists) morality..

    It is what it is…False morality facism…..
    Touch my kids and your dead pervert…………

    Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.

    First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole.

    Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian because the essence of an ideology (I would note that conservatism correctly understood is not an ideology) is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true – such as the whole of the history of our culture is the history of the oppression of women. Since reality contradicts that, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history. People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say, “Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state.

    Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing.

    Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women, (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals. These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do. Similarly, white males are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism.

    Fourth, both economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation. When the classical Marxists, the communists, took over a country like Russia, they expropriated the bourgeoisie, they took away their property. Similarly, when the cultural Marxists take over a university campus, they expropriate through things like quotas for admissions. When a white student with superior qualifications is denied admittance to a college in favor of a black or Hispanic who isn’t as well qualified, the white student is expropriated. And indeed, affirmative action, in our whole society today, is a system of expropriation. White owned companies don’t get a contract because the contract is reserved for a company owned by, say, Hispanics or women. So expropriation is a principle tool for both forms of Marxism.