On its face, Act 10 is neutral—it does not tie public employees’ use of the state’s payroll system to speech on any particular viewpoint. See Velazquez, 531 U.S. at 546-48 (speech subsidy viewpoint discriminatory when conditioned on recipient advancing particular viewpoint). Nevertheless, the Unions argue that Act 10 facially discriminates on the basis of viewpoint because general employee unions and public safety unions will necessarily espouse different viewpoints. Maybe they do. But this argument merely recycles the Unions’ earlier assertion that speaker-based discrimination in the subsidy context requires heightened scrutiny. It does not.
Latest Reader Blogs
Ousted And Angry AZ gop Says He Would Sterilize Women Who Don't Make Enough Money If We Put Him In Charge So He QuitCamp Liberty's Freedom Blog - September 15, 2014
America's Not Ready For Prime Time gop Tells Teaster Crowd: The "first executive order that I would issue would be to repeal all previous executive orders" --- Update: Stop Believing Paul Means What He SaysCamp Liberty's Freedom Blog - September 13, 2014
Camp Liberty's Freedom Blog - September 13, 2014
TheLastBestHope - September 12, 2014