Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, October 09, 2008


Greedy North Dakota Board of Higher Education Want to Spend Today; Oppose Measures 1 and 2!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
All our money belongs to them!

Greedy is as Greedy does:

BISMARCK — If North Dakota voters pass initiated measures No. 1 and No. 2, it would hurt the future of the state, not just North Dakota University System’s plans for holding tuition steady and granting faculty salary increases, members of the Board of Higher Education said Wednesday.

“We’d have to raise tuition 8 (percent) to 12 percent,” President Richie Smith of Wahpeton, N.D., said during the discussion.

Well first of all how irresponsible is this.  The Board of Higher Education is encouraging the state to keep raiding the Permanent Oil Tax Trust Fund in order to keep pumping money to the University system so they can keep spending like drunken fools.  And since when have they been trying to keep tuition steady.  Last year the legislature gave them a shocking TWENTY-ONE PERCENT INCREASE in state funding.  Did they cut tuition or even hold tuition constant.  NO.  Tuition at UND went up 5.8% in the first year of the biennium and 6.25 in the second year. 

Let’s not forget that these are the same irresponsible folks that were planning to demand a 53% increase in funding from the legislature.  So we know that their only priority is spending more, not responsibly managing the higher education system. 

Measure one would protect the Permanent Oil Trust Fund from the big spenders in the legislature.  In fact in the last two sessions Governor Hoeven and crew have raided nearly a quarter billion dollars from our trust fund.  That fund is vital in order to cushion us from the vagaries of the cyclical oil industry.  Today the price of oil dropped down below $80.  Oil revenues are not a sure thing. 

Some, given the cyclical nature of the industry, say it’s too risky to lower the tax rates.  Risky as compared to what, spending increases.  As we found in the last oil boom when the state government foolishly spends the money they don’t want to cut back spending.  No all we get is tax increases piled on top of tax increases. Because according to the government unions and spendocrats they certainly shouldn’t be expected to suck in up in lean times, that’s for the regular folks.

They are also against measure two that would provide the citizens of North Dakota with vital income tax relief.  Of course the big spenders in the governor’s mansion and the Board of Higher Education don’t want to see the general public benefit from the oil boom.  No they think that this money belongs to them to parcel out to government employees and other special interests.

I’d like to ask them WHY they are so afraid to have the states taxpayers share in the good time?

The Board of Higher Education is appointed by the Governor.  This entire mess can be laid at his feet.  He’s let the oil money go to his head. 

 

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for GrampsWithCramps

It’s really quite alarming that the BOHE would insert itself into the debate over these two measures.  They are a quasi-government agency, and really should not take an official position on any issue before the voters. 

The voters of our state deserve better.  They deserve the fiscal responsibility & tax relief these measures will provide.

GrampsWithCramps on October 9, 2008 at 11:44 am
Avatar for imagine

Property tax relief please….not state income tax relief…property tax relief…property tax relief…

imagine on October 9, 2008 at 12:55 pm

Property tax relief please….not state income tax relief…property tax relief…property tax relief…

Unfortunately what Hoeven’s talking isn’t property tax relief.

It’s throwing a ton more money at the school systems HOPING that they’ll not spend the money, but rather give it back to the taxpayers.  (After the first year).

Since local property taxes are sky high ONLY because the local government entities have elected to spend irresponsibly I don’t have any hope that they’ll suddenly change their ways.

As a matter of fact, I’m sick of hearing these same big spenders blame the state for not giving them a blank check.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 9, 2008 at 01:05 pm
Avatar for imagine

if they give money to the schools then the city can reduce my property taxes???

imagine on October 9, 2008 at 04:15 pm

They gave a lot more money to schools last year, by about an hundred million.  In the first year thr GF scjool board raised taxes on the city about 7%.

That was the year they got the influx of state money. I expect it will be worse this year.

Th governor said that money would take the pressure off property taxes.  Since that didn’t work he wants to throw 400 million at the problem.

What needs to happen is to tell the school boards and teachers unions to quit being so greedy.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 9, 2008 at 04:21 pm

I am sick and tired of Liberals saying we don’t give enough money to the schools. When are they ever going to have enough.


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on October 9, 2008 at 06:29 pm

That’s just it, we’ve given them everything they’ve asked for and still they demand more.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 9, 2008 at 07:30 pm

The teacher union members already get more than full time compensation for part time work.
The official ND teacher contract is 190 days a year. Do the math!148bhs.jpg


No Free Lunch
25i20w9.jpg

Kevin on October 9, 2008 at 08:09 pm
Avatar for imagine

There is no teachers ‘union’.  Since the late 60’s ND has been a “right to work” state.  Teachers have an ‘association’ with very little leverage. (ie….illegal to strike, and most districts do not have binding arbitration).  This is one of the significant reasons teachers salaries in the state are amongst the lowest nation wide.

Teachers are also contracted employee’s.  Contracts vary around the state but the 190 days is a fair number.  Most work second jobs or find summer employement as 190 days of employment does not pay all of the bills.

imagine on October 10, 2008 at 05:59 am

Most work second jobs or find summer employement as 190 days of employment does not pay all of the bills.

Gee, most people manage to live on less than $40, 50, 60 thousand when they work year round jobs, even without the generous benefits teachers get.

Two married teachers can earn over $115,000 working 9 months of the year.  We’re supposed to feel sorry for them and give up more to improve their lifestyles. 

They need a new boat?


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 10, 2008 at 07:26 am

Legality of Collective Bargaining:    State requires CB
Citation:
North Dakota Century Code: 15.1-16-13
“The board of the school district or its representatives and the representative organization or its representatives shall, if requested by either entity, meet at reasonable times and negotiate in good faith regarding:...”

http://www.nctq.org/tr3/districtHomepage.jsp?districtId=77


No Free Lunch
25i20w9.jpg

Kevin on October 10, 2008 at 08:33 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.