Governor Hoeven Upset That The Federal Government Isn’t Mandating More Ethanol Usage

A couple of days ago I posted about Congress struggling to figure out what they were going to do with all the ethanol they’d subsidized/mandated into existence. One of their “solutions” was for the EPA to mandate increased use of ethanol blends in fuels. Meaning their solution for creating a glut of a biofuel nobody really wants to buy is to force people to buy it.
And North Dakota Governor John Hoeven would like the arm-twisting to commence a little faster.

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota Gov. John Hoeven says he’s disappointed the federal Environmental Protection Agency is delaying a decision on raising the ethanol content of fuel.
The agency says more testing is needed on the impact of raising the maximum ethanol content of gasoline from 10 percent to 15 percent. The testing is to see how the change affects engine performance. The EPA says it isn’t likely to make a decision before June.
Hoeven says the EPA has been studying the move for more than a year. He says raising the allowable ethanol content of gasoline will increase demand for alternative fuels and help North Dakota producers.

Here’s a thought: Maybe North Dakota producers should quit making a fuel that is only “in demand” in so far as the government creates demand for it.
Personally, I think production should be determined by demand. And not government-manufactured demand but actual “Hey, I want some of that” demand from actual citizens.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array jimmypop

    wait, hovey is a liberal on many issues? whoa!

    next thing you will tell me is he and the republicans in ND will piss away a $1.2B surplus. never happen.

  • Brent

    “Hoeven, Dorgan, tomato, potato.”

    But… but… but… Hoeven will vote for Mitch McConnell instead of Harry Reid…

    With choices like that, just kill us now and get it over with.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I think the performance of a 10% blend is just fine. Mileage doesn’t suffer
    and the fuel system stays clean as a whistle.

  • mtdakota

    O great, another RINO.
    Also, I never could figure out why he was against the trust fund idea. Maybe our surplus is destined to be pissed away, *sigh*

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Agreed. What we’ve found is that ethanol is not ever going to be an
    economical energy source. Even when the price of gasoline was $4/gallon it
    didn’t work out.

  • sayanything-43

    I’ve burned 10% ethanol for a long time. At that level it makes sense.

    I’m concerned that at 15% it will damage the vehicle. I might just drop it altogether.

  • hightimes

    Hoeven, Dorgan, tomato, potato.

  • headward

    You will see a performance issue with more ethanol. I like the 100% gasoline. Better performance, and milage than ethanol blends. I don’t think it will damage your vehicle.

    Maybe somebody should tell Hoven that we have a stronger oil production than ethanol production in this state.

  • sayanything-101

    Hoeven hates the free market.

  • spartacus

    Why is he worried about it? Isn’t N.D.’d cash crop Durham wheat that is mostly exported to Italy?

  • headward

    Yeah, a 10% blend is fine. BUT the government throwing money at it instead of the market using it is very bad. Why is my tax money getting used to raise the price of corn(which will raise the price of most food) for ethanol?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development