Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Government Housing Programs Helped Create Subprime Loan Problem

Because the federal government was requiring that some lenders make loans to people who couldn’t afford them.

In 2004, as regulators warned that subprime lenders were saddling borrowers with mortgages they could not afford, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development helped fuel more of that risky lending.

Eager to put more low-income and minority families into their own homes, the agency required that two government-chartered mortgage finance firms purchase far more “affordable” loans made to these borrowers. HUD stuck with an outdated policy that allowed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to count billions of dollars they invested in subprime loans as a public good that would foster affordable housing.

Housing experts and some congressional leaders now view those decisions as mistakes that contributed to an escalation of subprime lending that is roiling the U.S. economy.

So what do we do?  Create another government program to fix the problems created by this government program?  Or should we just admit that the government has no place deciding who should and should not get home loans?

Meanwhile, some in this country still want to put these same short-sighted, dim-witted bureaucrats in charge of a nationalized health care system.

Comments

[Shaking head].....

golfmann on June 10, 2008 at 10:05 am

Bushco was touting the ownership society.

ellinas on August 11, 2008 at 10:22 am

Because the federal government was requiring that some lenders make loans to people who couldn’t afford them.

These practices were mandated by Congress. Loans to people by any past objective standards should have been refused financing.

Then, there were speculators, who bought houses with the intent of watching the value increase astronomically while they never intended to live in those places. They would simply make mortgage payments on their residences and the speculated parcel and hope that they could see that 20 percent increase every year.

Both schemes failed. People who could not qualify for a loan or who had a bad credit history should have been refused financing. Pure speculators, who bought excess property that did not increase in value: too bad. Neither should be reward for bad decisions with our tax money.
Back at the campfire:

Meanwhile, some in this country still want to put these same short-sighted, dim-witted bureaucrats in charge of a nationalized health care system.

Let us all, just stick our heads up our ass and let this proceed.

Eneils Bailey on August 11, 2008 at 10:32 am

During the Reagan/Bush years we had tax cuts, increased government size, huge budget deficits, humongous increases in the national debt, tax increases, deregulation of the financial system, and the result of all that was the crash/looting of the Savings and Loan financial institutions and subsequent bailout by the taxpayer.

During the Bush/Cheney years we had tax cuts, increased government size, huge budget deficits, humongous increases in the national debt, deregulation of the financial system, and the result of all that was the crash of the housing market, the huge losses of the financial institutions and subsequent bailout by the taxpayer.

ellinas on August 17, 2008 at 03:40 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.