Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Google Stonewalls Congress

Hmm...
The Congress' Congressional Human Rights Caucus has requested that Google meet with it to discuss the ramifications of operating its business and search services in China. Google however, has refused to meet with the Caucus. No statement from either side has been given but there are other companies who have been called in as well. Human rights groups are calling Google out along with Yahoo but no progress is being made. Yahoo also, has not responded to the request for a hearing.

Google has done nothing illegal by choosing to deal with the Chinese government, so really they have no obligation to appear.  Congress can request, Google can refuse.

It seems to me, though, that Google's interests would have best been served by showing up and talking with the Human Rights Caucus.  The company has claimed that they are concerned with human rights in China, but that they see pushing Google into China is better than the Chinese not having Google at all.  That's not a position I agree with, but at least it's defensible.

Google could have met with this caucus and made their case again, but instead they've decided not to cooperate.  I can't help but feel that this decision isn't going to work in their favor.

Comments

Avatar for likwidshoe

gus3 said, Not exactly. My understanding is that Congress issued a subpoena.

I don’t see where that is reported. The subpoena they are refusing is in regards to the Washington request to subpoena randomly picked search results in regards to the fight against child porn. Separate issue.

likwidshoe on January 31, 2006 at 11:01 am
Avatar for gus3

Woops, yes, I did confuse the issues. Not a subpoena in this case…

...but I doubt GOOG would cooperate even if it were.

/weasel mode off

gus3 on January 31, 2006 at 11:02 am
Avatar for gus3

Congress can request, Google can refuse.

Not exactly. My understanding is that Congress issued a subpoena. Refusing to appear constitutes contempt of Congress.

gus3 on January 31, 2006 at 11:02 am
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

This is the first I’ve heard of a subpoena.  You’re right, if a subpoena was issued that’s another matter, but all I’ve heard it referred to is “a request.”


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on January 31, 2006 at 11:02 am
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

I’m surprised Bush has launched attacks to change the regrime at Google.

FreeRepublicans.com on January 31, 2006 at 02:01 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.