Good News On The Marriage Front

New York Times – How many American marriages end in divorce? One in two, if you believe the statistic endlessly repeated in media reports, academic papers and campaign speeches.
The figure is based on a simple – and flawed – calculation: the annual marriage rate per 1,000 people compared with the annual divorce rate. In 2003, for example, the most recent year for which data is available, there were 7.5 marriages per 1,000 people and 3.8 divorces, according to the National Center for Health Statistics.
But researchers say that this is misleading because the people who are divorcing in any given year are not the same as those who are marrying, and that the statistic is virtually useless in understanding divorce rates. In fact, they say, studies find that the divorce rate in the United States has never reached one in every two marriages, and new research suggests that, with rates now declining, it probably never will.
The method preferred by social scientists in determining the divorce rate is to calculate how many people who have ever married subsequently divorced. Counted that way, the rate has never exceeded about 41 percent, researchers say. Although sharply rising rates in the 1970s led some to project that the number would keep increasing, the rate has instead begun to inch downward.
“At this point, unless there’s some kind of turnaround, I wouldn’t expect any cohort to reach 50 percent, since none already has,” said Dr. Rose M. Kreider, a demographer in the Fertility and Family Statistics Branch of the Census Bureau.

“Families with highly educated mothers and families with less educated mothers are clearly moving in opposite directions,” Martin wrote in a paper that has not yet been published.
As the overall divorce rates shot up from the early 1960s through the late 1970s, Martin found, the divorce rate for women with college degrees and those without moved in lockstep, with graduates consistently having about one-third to one-fourth the divorce rate of nongraduates.
But since 1980, the two groups have taken diverging paths. Women without an undergraduate degree have remained at about the same rate, their risk of divorce or separation within the first 10 years of marriage hovering at around 35 percent. But for college graduates, the divorce rate in the first 10 years of marriage has plummeted to just over 16 percent of those married between 1990 and 1994 from 27 percent of those married between 1975 and 1979.
About 60 percent of all marriages that eventually end in divorce do so within the first 10 years, researchers say. If that continues to hold true, the divorce rate for college graduates who married between 1990 and 1994 would end up at only about 25 percent, compared to well over 50 percent for those without a college degree.
“It’s a big ‘wow’ sort of story,” Martin said. “I’ve been looking for two years at other data sets to see if it’s wrong, but it really looks like it’s happening.”

I never realized that a college degree was such a statistically significant indicator as to how well a marriage will hold up. But the overall numbers going down steadily for a few years now is absolutely stellar. I’m very glad to hear it.
Any input on why college degrees play such a large role?

Tags:


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Aaron

    People change a lot between 18 and 28, and the chance of “”growing apart” is much bigger.

    This is interesting to me, because I’ve always held the opposite opinion on the matter. My wife and I were married at 20 and I thought it was the greatest thing to be married so young because we were’t “stuck in our ways.” I think that many people who marry young get to spend a great deal of their developing life together and, if they work at it, can become much closer that way. Those I’ve known to get married older are much more independent of one another and I don’t think this serves the purpose of a marriage well. Obviously, exceptions apply (I may be one for all I know) but this is the general view I’ve always had of young marriage…

  • http://www.aclearvoice.comindex2.html/ Raina

    Carrick – My mom and dad got engaged after knowing each other for two weeks. They were 19 and 21, and this year they’ll be celebrating their 28th wedding anniversary.

    (A few months ago we were sitting around the campfire discussing this and my dad told a story that happened about a week into all of this where he purposely tried to sit away from my mother at a school function because he thought “things were moving a little too fast.” J )

    I got engaged to my husband at 20 after dating for about a month, although we had been good friends for about 5 months before that. I had known I would marry him several months into the friendship.

    So I’ll definitely agree that sometimes you “”just know.”

    However, I’d think that college education makes a difference not necessarily because you’re older, but because you’re more educated as to the realities of life, more willing to work at something, and you each have other interests so you’re not totally dependant on the other person to make you happy. (Obviously there are exceptions.)

  • Carrick

    Aaron: I noticed you were referring to self-employed… which historically is unusual (less so today) and definitely a very different situation than say service industry (as an employee) or factory worker…

    People who are self-employed can pick their hours to work around family (sort of like I do as a scientist). For them (as for me) their advocation tends to be the same as their vocation, so there is less stress and dissatisfaction associated with working longer hours.

    In terms of Seth’s point about a relationship between engagement length and marriage failure rate… there may well be for younger couples (say under full adult age of 28). I wouldn’t be surprised if age is just a bigger factor period. People change a lot between 18 and 28, and the chance of “growing apart” is much bigger.

    Also, as you get older you tend to be able to judge people pretty quickly. My wife and I separately knew the first night we met that we were going to get married (took three days to “confess” this to each other, two weeks before engagement, thirty days from then to marriage). No surprises and absolutely no looking back for either of us!

    Sometimes when it is “just right”, it is just obvious, I guess.

  • Carrick

    Aaron: Thanks for posting this. It is a very interesting study, and a good example of how you can generate erroneous results using bad statistics. I wouldn’t have thought needing to distinguish “marriage failure rate” (which tracks the average failure rate of a given marriage) from the “divorce rate’, but it is an excellent point…

    You ask

    Any input on why college degrees play such a large role?

    I believe it is as simple as college eduction correlates with economic status. People in the lower wage groups tend to have to work more hours, and have jobs which tend to be more disruptive of family life. Take for example, people who work swing shifts, one of the great evils of our current industry in my opinion. People who are forced to work two jobs to make ends meet are a second example.

    I have in-laws who work swing shifts who rarely see their families due to the screwed up hours they are forced to work. When they are home for 2 of three weeks, they are asleep or very grumpy when everybody else is home. Needless to say (which is why I am compelled to say it), this arrangement is highly disruptive to the family unit and spousal relationship. (In one case, I think they would get divorced, except neither can afford to live independently.)

    <speculation>
    As to why the gap is getting bigger, I think it is as simple as salaries in the manufacturing and service sectors have not kept track with overall salary growth, and the vast majority of people in those sectors do not have a post-high school degree.

    Thus, the wage disparity between people with a degree and those without has grown simply because the economic disparity between people with a college degree and those without has grown.
    </speculation>

  • Seth Williams

    I also wonder what, if any, correllation there is between length of engagement (not dating, actual engagement) and divorce rate. Also, the age at which people get married and the divorce rate. I should think that people who wait longer are less likely to divorce than those who plunge in impulsively. I also think that older people are less likely to be impulsive. Having a college degree plays into this I think, as that has the effect of making people wait until they are somewhat older. I also think that college graduates may be more inclined to think critically about life choices.

    I was married and divorced early also. Money was part of it.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Aaron

    Good points, Carrick. Though I’d have to take issue in a sort with this:

    People in the lower wage groups tend to have to work more hours, and have jobs which tend to be more disruptive of family life.

    From a purely anecdotal perspective, the people that I knew growing up that made more money worked more hours. Most of my family did not have a college education (yet still had an excellent “divorce rate”) but many were self employed and, compared to those in the cooperate ladder making 6 figures that I knew, worked many less hours…

    Purely anecdotal, I have no statistics to back any of this up.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    On a somewhat unrelated note, one perception I had of marriage growing up was that males were much more likely to be the reason for a divorce through infidelity than females. When I started working in the PI business, however, I noticed that I got hired by far more men to watch their wives (who usually really were cheating) than women to watch their husbands.

    I just thought that it was strange. And it happens a lot, especially in this age of internet. You’d be shocked by how many cases of wives meeting people over chat or Myspace or something I get in a month. I’ve talked to lots of other PI’s from other parts of the country (at conferences and what not) and they’ve noticed the same thing.

    I don’t know if this just means that a man is more likely to hire a PI, but it certainly shatters a myth for me that female infidelity is more rare than male.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    From my anecdotal experience Carrick’s assertions make sense. I was married and divorced at an early age and would certainly count money among the largest reasons for the divorce.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development