Gibbs: New York 23 Elected A Non-Republican For First Time Since Civil War, Reality: 1993

If the Civil War took place in the 1980′s then he’s right, I guess. But I don’t think Lee and Grant were matching wits in the early 1990′s.
He wants you to know that New York 23 was totally a loss for conservatism, but the Virginia and New Jersey races totally weren’t a loss for Obama despite The One having campaigned and contributed heavily to the Dem candidates in both those races.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs today said that Republican gubernatorial victories in Virginia and New Jersey do not portend anything for President Obama, but the dynamics and the Democratic candidate’s success in the special election in Upstate New York has ramifications for the GOP.
“I think the data from the gubernatorial races demonstrates that voters went to the polls in those two contests to talk about and work though very local issues that didn’t involve the president,” Gibbs said, invoking exit polls indicating that most voters in those two states said that President Obama was not a factor in their votes.
In the New York race, Gibbs said, “we watched a party pick a candidate and then purge that candidate. And I think the result was an election (in which) that district sent its first non-Republican to Congress since before the Civil War.”

A quick check of Wikipedia shows that from 1989 – 1993 one Michael R. McNulty represented New York’s 23rd district.
What’s sad is that these idiots can’t even get their spin right.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array jimmypop

    what he also seems to miss is the fact the gop tide might be turning back to its winning ways. there were two rock solid liberals on that ballot. im glad the wolf in sheeps clothing was forced out of her closet.

  • lock’m'up

    NY23 does tell us something. Rush & the Republicans can undermine Beck, Pawlenty, Palin and the conservative movement. It’s time for them to get back on board with the building conservative momentum.

  • sayanything-2

    So, the 23rd did not exost 100 years ago. Makes the lie even more egregious.

  • Mongol
  • Mongol

    My question, is Gibbs related to our Berlin Wall Boy? They both have such fantastic knowledge of history and economics. But hey WH measures economic recovery by the number of Google hits, what do those pesky historical facts matter? I tell you the Republicans held NY 23 for literally billions trillions years.

  • Ken

    “It’s the 23rd district now Ken, it was labelled the 24th prior to 2000. My source is the Wiki too.

    Look at the article on McHugh.”

    I did look at the McHugh article and it conforms to what you stated. However, by simply looking at a record of the congressional districts, I’m still unable to see where that’s true (that is, without engaging in a bit of gerrymandering). I don’t doubt you’re right since this is what the media (including Fox) has also reported. Perhaps if I look a bit closer I’ll be able to figure it out.

  • sayanything-9974

    The Administration will tell you how to think and everything that you you need to know. If you are not on board with that you are no better than Fox news or Talk radio. So get out the kneepads an let the Lewinsky’s begin. Boy, the Dem/Libs have done a 180 in the last year. When all you have is lies you might as well make them whoppers.

  • Ken

    “You need to check the 24-th district, which is what the district was labeled in 1993. Also the district was reshaped in 2000, when it was renamed the 23rd.”

    According to wiki, the 24th district has had Dem representatives as recently as the 70s. What area are you, along with Gibbs, considering to be “the 23rd district that hasn’t been under Democratic control since 1851″?

  • Mongol

    lol

  • Hanni

    A quick check of Wikipedia shows that from 1989 – 1993 one Michael R. McNulty represented New York’s 23rd district.

    Greg says Wiki cant be trusted….but of course when it works to your advantage, it can.

    Hypocrites.

  • sayanything-12

    It’s the 23rd district now Ken, it was labelled the 24th prior to 2000. My source is the Wiki too.

    Look at the article on McHugh.

  • sayanything-12

    You need to check the 24-th district, which is what the district was labeled in 1993. Also the district was reshaped in 2000, when it was renamed the 23rd.

    Anyway the correct statement is “parts of what is known as the 23rd district hasn’t been in Democratic control since 1851.”

    As Whistler says “go Whigs”.

  • lock’m'up

    Michael R. McNulty represented the 21st, not 23rd.

  • sayanything-5371

    “Is Hanni, Hannitized?”

    No, hanni is herpitized.

  • Lioncourt

    Another brilliant job of research by Rob.

    Typical.

  • Hanni

    And the most important point is that VA and NJ for the last 6 presidencies has flipped to the opposing party of the president.

    Now….NY….that’s a different story.

    NJ was a referendum on the incumbent, not on Obama, according to exit polls.

  • sayanything-2

    Yep, made you liars eat your words, lyingcourt. Good job, Rob!

  • HG

    Is Hanni, Hannitized?

  • lock’m'up

    Gibbs must have been talking about the Georgian civil war.

  • sayanything-7610

    Heh! Fibbs is fibbin’…. Obey-me was supposedly watching a documentary about himself instead of election results…. yeah, right….pretty telling that the two he campaigned for, LOST…..the one he didn’t campaign for won!

  • sayanything-7610

    It’s so nice of them (libtards) to give us advice on how to win though isn’t it?! They’re just so sweet to be concerned….
    /sarc

  • bikebubba

    The real irony is that it appears that it’s been mostly held by Democrats, also contrary to Democrat/media talking points.

    (democrats; is there anything they get RIGHT?)

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development