Genetics Debate Heats Up In New Zealand

Some in New Zealand aren’t too happy about the idea of milk from genetically engineered cows.

MAdGE (Mothers Against Genetic Engineering in Food and the Environment) today launched a highly controversial billboard campaign in Auckland and Wellington to provoke public debate about the social and cultural ethics of genetic engineering in New Zealand.
The billboards depict a naked, genetically engineered woman with four breasts being milked by a milking machine, and GE branded on her rump.
“New Zealanders are allowing a handful of corporate scientists and ill-informed politicians to make decisions on the ethics of GE. Our largest science company, AgResearch, is currently putting human genes into cows in the hope of creating new designer milks. The ethics of such experiments have not even been discussed by the wider public. How far will we allow them to go? Where is the line in the sand? Why is the government lifting the moratorium on GE when we have not even had a public debate on ethics?” said Alannah Currie Madge founder and billboard designer.
Fonterra, New Zealand’s largest milk company recently purchased the patent rights to large amounts of human DNA from an Australian genetics company. (Dominionpost 15.9.2003) “The mothers of New Zealand would like to know exactly what our milk company are doing with this human DNA. We at MAdGE want an assurance from Fonterra that they will continue to keep our milk GE Free now and in the future and not use human genes in cows to boost milk production.” said Ms Currie.

I don’t know much about this issue, so even though it seems pretty creepy I can’t really speak intelligently to it. What I can do is show you the creepy billboard they’re using to get their message across.

geneticsbillboard.jpeg

It certainly grabs one’s attention.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://littleblackdogphotoblog.blogspot.com/ Mr. Bowen

    Daaaamn! Sign me up as being a solid supporter of GE milk, based on that billboard alone!

    Yeesh. Don’t these “people” understand the concept of “unintended consequences”?

  • Chris

    OK. So you got a bunch of snarky comments and one that has nothing to do with the subject at hand. I know a thing or two about genetics. Here’s my take.

    First off. I don’t really worry about consuming this stuff. It’s all protein and fat and water and our systems should take it (omitting the ole you never know argument). However, ethics and environment are a different subject. Let’s split this in two. Animal and vegetable.

    Animal/ethics – I’m agin’ it. I’m not really keen on developing oversized cows that are so huge they can’t even walk and lead totally miserable lives. I know the chicken I eat is already growing up in rotten conditions, but that doesn’t mean we should just cut loose and create legless bags of meat.

    Vegetable/environment – I’m agin’ it agin. Take corn for instance. Let’s say you clone a gene for pesticide resistance into corn and then plant it in a field. That corn’s seed can easily escape the confines of the field and maybe cross with wild strains. This corn has an unnatural evolutionary advantage (sorry for using that word. I’m a democrat. I know how you republicans recoil at even the thought of science) Anyway, now this super corn can spread to wild strains of corn and out compete the rest. Suddenly your diversity is shot and when this strain of corn has some kinda disease there is nothing left in reserve to resort to. Diversity in wild populations is very important for continuation of cultivated populations. They have already found genetically modified corn in the middle of Mexico where corn came from. Where all the corn diversity is. Where no GM foods are supposed to be available. This is bad news.

  • Chris

    PS. What the hell is Jordan talking about. We talk about the ehtics of performing abortions all the time. It dominates our judicial selections. It drives our voting. It divides us.

    You’re working way to hard to grind your particular axe.

  • http://www.thoughtgalaxy.com/blog/ Jordan

    Right, so we all need to sit down and discuss the ethics of what companies do to make a product, but God forbid we bring up the ethics of performing abortions! *rolls eyes*

  • http://www.cranialcavity.net/ marc

    I’ll avoid any snarky comments about having quadruple the pleasure with this setup.

    If real think how much of Flint’s cash she could demand for a photo spread.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development