Geithner Wants Power To Nationalize Non-Bank Financial Companies

The liberals will claim this isn’t nationalization, but c’mon. The government seizing companies and running them? That’s nationalization, even if we can believe claims from the Obama administration that it’d just be temporary.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is asking Congress for broad regulatory powers to seize non-bank financial companies, a bold move to further expand the Treasury’s power over the financial industry.
The proposed legislation will allow the government to purchase assets, guarantee liabilities, and buy an equity interest in a large array of financial services companies if they pose systemic risk to the financial system.
“The objective is to promote long-term value and growth for shareholders, companies, workers and the economy at large and to reduce the risk of financial rises that the current one from occurring again,” Geithner plans to tell the House Financial Services Committee this morning.

So why would anyone assume that the government, which barely manages to run the Post Office on a day to day basis, can run these troubled companies better than the people already running them? Why would we assume that a government take over of these companies is preferable to, say, simply letting the market take its course?
If these massive companies know that the government will step in any time they get in over their heads, then what incentive do these companies have to behave responsibly? Does this government safety net not promote irresponsible lending (among other activities) simply because there’s plenty of incentive to lend and otherwise act indiscriminately for short-term profit with the full knowledge that long-term solvency will be propped up by the government?
Of course.
And then there’s the question of how long it will take before the government begins to abuse this. Does anyone really think we can trust the angels in government to only use this broad, sweeping power for the good of the economy in general? The potential for graft, corruption and outright theft here is amazing.
We’d be fools to allow the government to take this power. It’s only going to promote more bad behavior in the markets, at best, and create corrupt nationalized version of our financial systems at worst.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://twitter.com/ssunnysengar twitter-57722159

    Thanks for this fabulous information. This really helps, i’ve been looking for this kind of info hub on this issue for a long time now and for sure this one is great.
    ===================================
    Thanks for this fabulous information. This really helps, i’ve been looking for this kind of info hub on this issue for a long time now and for sure this one is great.
    ===================================
    Financial Services

  • SigFan

    There's an oxymoron if I ever heard on – a Temporary Government Program. This is just one more incremental step to Fascist control of the financial industry. Once they have finance everything else tumbles.

    Side note — is it just me or does Geithner look like he should have been cast in Lord of the Rings — Wormtongue or Gollum pre-ring perhaps?

  • http://Array Brent

    Also recall that AIG lost something like $60 billion last quarter… with the government-appointed CEO in charge of it.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 Dino2

    Yeah Brent, he should have been able to turn it profitable.

    Dumbshit.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    time to go to work Dino..oh that's right, lefties don't work, they just wait for the mailman to bring them their handout.

  • robert108

    Yeah Brent, he should have been able to turn it profitable.

    The govt isn't profitable, uneducated little dinostem; it's an expense to the productive sector. Educate yourself, fool.

  • Brent

    Yeah Brent, he should have been able to turn it profitable.

    Dumbshit.

    Sorry, Dino, I just don't care about trash like you.

  • jimmypop

    Yeah Brent, he should have been able to turn it profitable.

    Dumbshit.

    no, he should have let them fail. thats what happened when you run a business poorly. unless, you have the right (well, mostly left) friends.

  • Mark

    Yeah Brent, he should have been able to turn it profitable.
    Dumbshit.

    Moron!

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development