<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gannon Not Getting Much Media Play</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/</link>
	<description>North Dakota&#039;s Most Popular And Influential Political Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: likwidshoe</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160425</link>
		<dc:creator>likwidshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160425</guid>
		<description>from the stupid Salon article, &quot;...in order to pose softball questions to administration officials would qualify as news by any recent Beltway standard...&quot; 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/graham200502160746.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What are they talking about?&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the stupid Salon article, &quot;&#8230;in order to pose softball questions to administration officials would qualify as news by any recent Beltway standard&#8230;&quot; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/graham200502160746.asp" rel="nofollow">What are they talking about?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFH</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160430</link>
		<dc:creator>JFH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160430</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for a big expose on this.  And I&#039;m sure 60 Minutes et. al. are probably investigating this for a story.  If a story doesn&#039;t come out, it&#039;s not because of any white-washing; it&#039;s because there was no &quot;there&quot; there. 
 
(Boy, was that an awkwardly formed phrase!) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m all for a big expose on this.  And I&#39;m sure 60 Minutes et. al. are probably investigating this for a story.  If a story doesn&#39;t come out, it&#39;s not because of any white-washing; it&#39;s because there was no &quot;there&quot; there. </p>
<p>(Boy, was that an awkwardly formed phrase!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robport</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160431</link>
		<dc:creator>robport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160431</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#226;&#8222;&#162;s a pro forma question on every security questionnaire. It enables the people doing the vetting to go back to your employer and ascertain if you were some kind of psycho or a model employee.&lt;/em&gt; 
 
There is no indication that Gannon, or any other journalist receiving a day pass, had to fill out any such form or that any of them had to provide any employment history at all aside from who they were currently working for. Your assertions here are unfounded. 
 
&lt;em&gt;Well, then they must have found out Gannon/Guckert had no previous media experience. Hmmmm.&lt;/em&gt; 
 
Assuming the asked, that is what they would have found.  But does that necessarily disqualify him? 
 
&lt;em&gt;Nonsense. Let&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#226;&#8222;&#162;s suppose Gannon/Guckert didn&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#226;&#8222;&#162;t put down &quot;&quot;gay prostitute&quot; as his business. Let&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#226;&#8222;&#162;s say he put down something innocuous like &quot;&quot;entrepreneur.&quot; Most any security vetting agency would be more curious as to see whta kind of &quot;&quot;entrepreneurship&quot; was involved.&lt;/em&gt; 
 
Again, this assumes that he was asked.  And it also assumes that his escort activity was his only job during that time.  He could have easily listed a legitimate day job. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It&Atilde;&cent;&acirc;&sbquo;&not;&acirc;&bdquo;&cent;s a pro forma question on every security questionnaire. It enables the people doing the vetting to go back to your employer and ascertain if you were some kind of psycho or a model employee.</em> </p>
<p>There is no indication that Gannon, or any other journalist receiving a day pass, had to fill out any such form or that any of them had to provide any employment history at all aside from who they were currently working for. Your assertions here are unfounded. </p>
<p><em>Well, then they must have found out Gannon/Guckert had no previous media experience. Hmmmm.</em> </p>
<p>Assuming the asked, that is what they would have found.  But does that necessarily disqualify him? </p>
<p><em>Nonsense. Let&Atilde;&cent;&acirc;&sbquo;&not;&acirc;&bdquo;&cent;s suppose Gannon/Guckert didn&Atilde;&cent;&acirc;&sbquo;&not;&acirc;&bdquo;&cent;t put down &quot;&quot;gay prostitute&quot; as his business. Let&Atilde;&cent;&acirc;&sbquo;&not;&acirc;&bdquo;&cent;s say he put down something innocuous like &quot;&quot;entrepreneur.&quot; Most any security vetting agency would be more curious as to see whta kind of &quot;&quot;entrepreneurship&quot; was involved.</em> </p>
<p>Again, this assumes that he was asked.  And it also assumes that his escort activity was his only job during that time.  He could have easily listed a legitimate day job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robport</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160432</link>
		<dc:creator>robport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160432</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;try another example: suppose I set up a website offering to sell methamphetamines. Are you saying that if I&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#226;&#8222;&#162;d never been arrested for drug-trafficking&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&quot;a security check wouldn&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#226;&#8222;&#162;t reveal my business is selling illegal drugs?&lt;/em&gt; 
 
If you&#039;d never been convicted of a crime the background check conducted by the White House, which was a simple criminal records check, would not turn a thing up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>try another example: suppose I set up a website offering to sell methamphetamines. Are you saying that if I&Atilde;&cent;&acirc;&sbquo;&not;&acirc;&bdquo;&cent;d never been arrested for drug-trafficking&Atilde;&cent;&acirc;&sbquo;&not;&quot;a security check wouldn&Atilde;&cent;&acirc;&sbquo;&not;&acirc;&bdquo;&cent;t reveal my business is selling illegal drugs?</em> </p>
<p>If you&#39;d never been convicted of a crime the background check conducted by the White House, which was a simple criminal records check, would not turn a thing up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160426</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160426</guid>
		<description>1. It&#039;s a pro forma question on every security questionnaire.  It enables the people doing the vetting to go back to your employer and ascertain if you were some kind of psycho or a model employee. 
 
2. Well, then they must have found out Gannon/Guckert had no previous media experience.  Hmmmm. 
 
3. Nonsense. Let&#039;s suppose Gannon/Guckert didn&#039;t put down &quot;gay prostitute&quot; as his business.  Let&#039;s say he put down something inocuous like &quot;entrepreneur.&quot;  Most any security vetting agency would be more curious as to see whta kind of &quot;entrepreneurship&quot; was involved. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. It&#39;s a pro forma question on every security questionnaire.  It enables the people doing the vetting to go back to your employer and ascertain if you were some kind of psycho or a model employee. </p>
<p>2. Well, then they must have found out Gannon/Guckert had no previous media experience.  Hmmmm. </p>
<p>3. Nonsense. Let&#39;s suppose Gannon/Guckert didn&#39;t put down &quot;gay prostitute&quot; as his business.  Let&#39;s say he put down something inocuous like &quot;entrepreneur.&quot;  Most any security vetting agency would be more curious as to see whta kind of &quot;entrepreneurship&quot; was involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robport</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160433</link>
		<dc:creator>robport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160433</guid>
		<description>1.  Does the White House ask for any such thing?  I&#039;ve not heard of that. 
 
2.  If they do ask it, its presumably to get an idea of what kind of media outfits the reporter works for/has worked for. 
 
3.  Asking for previous employers still doesn&#039;t explain how the White House could have possibly known about Gannon&#039;s male escort activities. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Does the White House ask for any such thing?  I&#39;ve not heard of that. </p>
<p>2.  If they do ask it, its presumably to get an idea of what kind of media outfits the reporter works for/has worked for. </p>
<p>3.  Asking for previous employers still doesn&#39;t explain how the White House could have possibly known about Gannon&#39;s male escort activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160428</guid>
		<description>a.) his sexuality was never an issue; the prostitution thingy is. 
 
b.)try another example: suppose I set up a website offering to sell methamphetamines. Are you saying that if I&#039;d never been arrested for drug-trafficking--a security check wouldn&#039;t reveal my business is selling illegal drugs? 
 
c.) he wasn&#039;t. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a.) his sexuality was never an issue; the prostitution thingy is. </p>
<p>b.)try another example: suppose I set up a website offering to sell methamphetamines. Are you saying that if I&#39;d never been arrested for drug-trafficking&#8211;a security check wouldn&#39;t reveal my business is selling illegal drugs? </p>
<p>c.) he wasn&#39;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slarrow</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160424</link>
		<dc:creator>slarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160424</guid>
		<description>&quot;But maybe this isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t getting a lot of media play because its just a dumb story. I wonder if that has ever crossed their minds.&quot;

Well, of course not, Rob. Whatever &lt;em&gt;were&lt;/em&gt; you thinking?

I&#039;ll chalk it up to Friday fatigue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But maybe this isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t getting a lot of media play because its just a dumb story. I wonder if that has ever crossed their minds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, of course not, Rob. Whatever <em>were</em> you thinking?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll chalk it up to Friday fatigue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johannabartley</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160427</link>
		<dc:creator>johannabartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160427</guid>
		<description>I told my boss that my previous employee was the california drug northern rehab and he hesitated to give me the job. He finally caved in when I proved I never was an addict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told my boss that my previous employee was the california drug northern rehab and he hesitated to give me the job. He finally caved in when I proved I never was an addict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160429</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/gannon_not_getting_much_media_play/#comment-160429</guid>
		<description>Then, Rob, why would a security check ask for your previous employers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then, Rob, why would a security check ask for your previous employers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
