Fun Union Facts

Whee….

AFL-CIO President John Sweeney boasted recently that the union consortium intended to pour millions of dollars into this year’s Congressional elections — hardly a shocker. What is news is that this year, for the first time, rank-and-file union members are getting a look at precisely how much of their mandatory dues money is going to fund Mr. Sweeney’s political causes, and plenty of other interesting details as well. . . .
Hard-working union members deserve to know, for example, that of the AFL-CIO’s $82 million in discretionary disbursements from July 2004 to June 2005, only 36% went to representing members in labor negotiations — which is what unions were created to do. A whopping $49 million, or 60% of its budget, instead went to political activities and lobbying, while another $2.4 million went to contributions, gifts and grants. The National Education Association was even more skewed toward politics, spending only 33% of its $143 million discretionary budget on improving its members’ lots.
By our calculations based on the filings, the AFL-CIO spent at least $2.7 million alone on T-shirts, flyers, telephone calls, Web site hosting, and other support for 2004 Presidential candidate John Kerry. Groups that received AFL-CIO money included Citizens for Tax Justice, an organization devoted to higher tax rates; the Economic Policy Institute, a think-tank that campaigns against Social Security privatization and tax cuts; and the Alliance for Justice, a ferocious opponent of President Bush’s Supreme Court nominees.
Dues-paying workers of the world might want to ask: Why is Mr. Sweeney spending more of their money trying to raise taxes, or fighting for the cultural left, than he is on collective bargaining?

Read the whole thing.
I find it particularly interesting that the teachers’ unions spend so much of their money on political activity even as teachers routinely complain about not being paid enough. Maybe teacher wages wouldn’t be such a problem for teachers if they weren’t paying such high union dues.
Just a thought.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://www.ourthyroids.com/ Hypothyroidism

    it is about 10 years since much aclaimed book of “Myth of Good Corporate Citizen” was publish, so it seems the facts were revealed about corporate and political sponsorships, and these things would spot… well it was only news for us – readers, those on top continue to play by the old rules, it just funny

  • gregdn

    With the U.S. auto industry in full retreat, I wonder how long it will take UAW members to demand their dues back.
    Personally I would be pretty upset at paying my union to negotiate wage and benefit cuts for me!

  • Steve L.

    My wife is a teacher and for amny years was a member of NEA. She initially joined because she felt an obligation to be apart of a professional organization of her profession. Finally, after many years, she has become disgusted with them and dropped her membership. The NEA has come to represent everything except the true needs of its membership. In our local district, they encouraged a teacher to file a grievance to stop a program that 90% of the teachers at the high school loved. They have coerced our legislature into passing laws that allow teachers to demand extra pay for merely doing their jobs.

    The NEA also does not represent teachers as a whole. They only represent those tachers who pay them dues. I once heard an NEA rep tell someone, “This is what the law says. Only tell other members about this. We don’t want non-members to have the same advice that you pay for.”

    recently, there was a survey done concerning the comparison of the NEA’s political contributions to the political idealogies of the membership. Needless to say, the NEA’s contribution went overwhelmingly to Democrats while the membership is split fairly evenly between Democrats, Republicans, and Independents.

    Any teacher wrth his/her salt needs to run away from the NEA as quickly as possible.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Certainly not 100% of union members support the Socialistic candidates that John Sweeney supports.

    Perhaps a majority do, but then why is the minority forced to pay for what the majority wishes to do.

    Why is it that John McCain had to restrict our ability to campaign, but gave the Unions a pass?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development