Freshman Democrat Senator Jim Webb Already Has A Negative Approval Rating

That was quick. Not even a month into the first session of Congress and already Sen. Jim Webb, narrow victor over George Allen in Virginia and chosen by Dems to deliver their response to the President’s state of the union speech, has a negative approval rating among his constituents.
42 – 47.
I think that’s significant as it sort of flies in the face of this idea of a “mandate” to pursue a liberal agenda Democrats have been pushing. Immediately after the election Pelosi and her Democrats claimed that America called for a “new direction” in political leadership. The Dems, amplified by the media, have also been saying that the election was a comment from Americans about Iraq. Yet is that true?
Webb has certainly been outspoken in his opposition to the President’s policies on Iraq, yet here he is with a negative approval rating right out of the gate. What does that tell us?
It tells me that the election was less a referendum on Iraq than it was a simple rejection of Republicans who had grown arrogant and corrupt while in power. When 15 of the campaigns Republicans lost in the House, and three of the campaigns they lost in the Senate, can be directly tied to scandal and controversy you can hardly say that the Democrats who picked up those seats really earned them with their policy ideas. And when Republicans, the supposed party of limited government and low taxes, are beat out by Democrats as the party who will most likely cut taxes and lower spending there is clearly something wrong.
Republicans lost the last election because some of them were corrupt, a few more were involved in personal scandals and a whole lot of them had abandoned the conservative principles of limited government and low spending that got them into power in the first place. The Dems were able to cash in on the Republicans shooting themselves in the foot, but that doesn’t mean the election was an endorsement of their policies (or that it was a punishment for Republicans and their stance on the war in Iraq), though it’s not surprising that this is what they’d like you to believe.
I suspect that a lot of the Democrats who took out incumbent Republicans in the last election are going to be suffering low approval numbers just as Webb is. That’s because most of those Dems didn’t win on their own merits but rather the demerits of their opponents.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    It’s probably because he said “it was time to put on his lamp shade” on “Face the Nation” last Sunday.
    I’ll bet he’s a party animal!

  • Puzzlefeet

    Any oversampling of Republicans in this one?

  • Puzzlefeet
  • DCBill

    Webb must go. He practiced a form of extortion by delaying promotions for senior military officers and civilian employees to obtain data from Secretary Gates on the closure of JFCOM. No problem with him trying to save jobs in Virginia, after all that is part of his job. What is wrong here is he punished people that had nothing to do with any of this – a cowardly act. He questioned new illnesses added to the presumptive agent orange disease list stating old men get these anyway even though there was more than enough scientific evidence to prove otherwise. As a victim of agent orange I am highly offended and as a Vietnam Veteran that Webb is he should never show his face at any veterans event, especially if Vietnam Veterans are present. I was close to the Pentagon scene when he was Secretary of the Navy under Reagan. He was quite ineffective.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development