French President Nicolas Sarkozy: Obama’s Foreign Policy Is “Immature”

Ouch:

French President Nicolas Sarkozy is very critical of U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama’s positions on Iran, according to reports that have reached Israel’s government.
Sarkozy has made his criticisms only in closed forums in France. But according to a senior Israeli government source, the reports reaching Israel indicate that Sarkozy views the Democratic candidate’s stance on Iran as “utterly immature” and comprised of “formulations empty of all content.”

Of course, the French government is denying that President Sarkozy said any such thing…

The French Embassy puts out a statement denying the Haaretz report that an Israeli official said President Sarkozy was troubled by his Iran policy:
The remarks attributed by the newspaper Haaretz to the president of the French Republic concerning Sen. Obama’s positions on Iran are groundless. To the contrary, the in-depth discussions between the president of the Republic and Sen. Obama on Iran during their meeting in Paris in July demonstrated a broad convergence of views on this issue. President Sarkozy and Sen. Obama agree to oppose Iran’s development of a military nuclear capability.

…but then, that’s exactly the sort of response you’d expect from a national government over these type of leaked comments. That doesn’t mean Sarkozy didn’t say them.
Remember, if Obama wins, Sarkozy has to work with the guy.
But even so, “immature” and “formulations empty of all content” sound like a pretty apt characterization of Obama’s policies in general.
By the way, remember when the media would hype any negative comments about President Bush from foreign leaders like Sarkozy? Remember when they’d use quotes like this and claim that Bush has made America “less popular” in the world?
Don’t expect the same treatment of Obama.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array RebTex

    For a rifle-dropper, he sure has some arm candy!

  • Mickey

    The Europeans will lead Obama around by the nose. They, like many of us, can read his naivete very easily.

    Sarkozy views the Democratic candidate’s stance on Iran as “utterly immature” and comprised of “formulations empty of all content.”

    This sums up Obama in a nut shell.
    Tell us something we don’t already know Nicolas.

  • di butler

    Hanny,

    You are just parsing words. what the meaning of “is” is bs. Of course, we come first. I don’t particularly care for the French, myself, I lived there when I was a child. The whole country smells like bo and boiled cabbage. The people were somewhat nice, I was a child, but they weren’t too kind to my mother and I can’t forget that.

  • di butler

    M.Obama est un enfant clueless! Sacre bleu!

  • http://www.williamhallowell.com/ Billy Hallowell

    Great post. With the election only one week away, getting the facts straight on foreign policy is extremely important. Foreign policy is, no doubt, central in this electoral cycle seeing as the next president is going to have to cope with a number of international challenges. Here at Public Agenda we have put together a non-partisan guide on foreign policy at http://publicagenda.org/citizen/electionguides/iraq. We also published an article entitled “Eight Things You Need to Know About Foreign Policy.” You can check that out at http://publicagenda.org/blogs/voters-survival-kit-eight-things-you-need-know-about-foreign-policy. Thanks, again, for the great piece!

  • http://dougeefargo.blogspot.com/ dougee

    I love this French President! Did anyone here the speech he gave before Congress? It was awesome.

  • Hannitized

    Di,

    You may think I am parsing words, but the subconscious is very powerful and telling. And people rarely do these sorts of things on accident.

    You don’t simultaneously refere to your next president as “the guy” while referring to the French president by name at the same time you both indicate that the French president has to work with ours, and making the subconscious decision to list them first.

    Rob likes him better because he is more conservative than the last French Pres, and because he believes the story that the president is denying.

    This is psyc 101.

  • Hannitized

    So you believe the photos are real now Joel, but not my resume? You are half way there, half-wit.

  • Hannitized

    Di,

    You may think I am parsing words, but the subconscious is very powerful and telling. And people rarely do these sorts of things on accident.

    You don’t simultaneously refere to your next president as “the guy” while referring to the French president by name at the same time you both indicate that the French president has to work with ours, and making the subconscious decision to list them first.

    Rob likes him better because he is more conservative than the last French Pres, and because he believes the story that the president is denying.

    This is psyc 101.

  • http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q;=NASDAQ:VECO Disgusted

    “…but then, that’s exactly the sort of response you’d expect from a national government over these type of leaked comments. That doesn’t mean Sarkozy didn’t say them.”

    That is by far the weakest argument I have seen written by the righties on this digital cesspool. It’s not even mean-spirited! How un-Republican!!! Have you given up?

    The Republicans should just dissolve and start a new party. There is no way that I will ever respect the party again after the way they conducted themselves over the last few months, and I don’t think I am alone.

  • Hannitized

    Remember, if Obama wins, Sarkozy has to work with the guy.

    Rob talks about Sarkozy as if he has more respect for him than the next US president. All of a sudden France not only matters to Rob, but is more important than our president.

    And he has the audacity to lecture us about how the Media will respond with hypocrisy.

    Only Rob Port is capable of such blatant hypocrisy.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    MERD!!

    How sad is it when a frenchman calls ya a weak fool?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    “Of course, it’s not up to the French to choose the next president of the United States of America. Whomsoever that may be, we will work with him happily and gladly. But I am especially happy to be meeting with the senator I met back in 2006 when we talked in such impassioned terms about Darfur, what was happening there.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    And there were two of us in that office, and there were two of us in my office. (Laughter.) And one of us became president. Well, let the other do likewise. Well, I mean, that’s not meddling.”

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    I am going to be laughing and mocking you dumb liberals when Obama loses in a landslide to the weakest GOP candidate in a generation and you’re all going “Bbbbbutt…we don’t know anyone who voted for him!”

    Rob on May 19, 2008 at 06:17 pm

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/some_hints/ AKAJOEL

    but the subconscious is very powerful and telling. And people rarely do these sorts of things on accident.This is psyc 101
    Hannitized on October 29, 2008 at 08:33 am

    Now this skinny little pimply-faced moron has added “psychologist” and “clairvoyant” to his already padded fantasy-land resume.

    Hannitized displays a mind trapped in a reality where words are phantoms-in a cocoon of semantic babble in which language is pureed into nonsense, and then nonsense is presented as argument.

  • Hannitized

    Where did Rob imply that he respected Sarcozy? He just pointed out that if Obama is elected he has to be able to deal w/ Sarcozy. You are grasping straws on this one, bud.

    Di,

    First, it was the way Rob used Sarcozy’s name and described Obama as “the guy”….he might as well have said “that one”. Second, he describes it as Sarcozy has to work with Obama instead of Obama having to work with Sarcozy.

    So much for putting America first.

    Lastly, you were wrong about your conclusion.

    He just pointed out that if Obama is elected he has to be able to deal w/ Sarcozy. You are grasping straws on this one, bud.

    No, he pointed out that Sarcozy has to work with Obama. So much for country first.

  • di butler

    Thank you for the psychology lesson. I never went to skool. Why are you so sensitive to every word that Rob writes? Where did he ever say he was nonjudgemental? I haven’t seen anything where he has said he is trying to approach anything he has written as “fair” to all. He has his opinion, of course it will be apparent in his writings. Obama may or may not be the next pres., but you wrote this as a fait accompli. This is proof of your bias and I don’t see Rob trying to parse every word you use. If you are going to make something a “deal,” at least pick something worthy. BTW, regardless whether Obama is the next pres. or not, he will never be “my” president.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    For a rifle-dropper, he sure has some arm candy!

    ???
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    RebTex, you need to meet some wimmen! Oh, oh, oh…you mean his wife! Never mind!

    M.Obama est un enfant clueless! Sacre bleu!

    Bon mot! Heh.

  • di butler

    Hanny,

    Where did Rob imply that he respected Sarcozy? He just pointed out that if Obama is elected he has to be able to deal w/ Sarcozy. You are grasping straws on this one, bud.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Ah, boob. A few pictures and a boilerplate diplomatic response obviously represent the truth here.

    What a small mind you have.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Disgusted, I doubt you and your faux-outrage were Republican to begin with.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development