Fred Barnes Has An Idea For Shaking Up The Bush Administration

Fred Barnes thinks some things need to change within the Bush administration:

It’s time for President Bush to think about a third term. No, he doesn’t need to overturn the Constitution. He can start the equivalent of his third term now, by filling his presidential staff and cabinet with new faces–or old faces in new positions–and by concentrating on new or forgotten initiatives. The goal: rejuvenation of his presidency by shocking the media and political community with a sweeping overhaul of his administration. The impact would be enormous because it’s exactly what his foes have been demanding and exactly what he is not expected to do. And it would give him a chance to escape the political doldrums that may otherwise doom his presidency through its final 34 months.

I think he’s exactly right. This is something I’ve talked about before here on Say Anything. President Bush has essentially the same team that he put in place after being sworn into office in 2001 working with him today. Some of these people, like Chief of Staff Andrew Card, are working in positions that normally see turnover every two or three years in other administrations. Given the Bush administration’s frustratingly lackluster performance of late some change doesn’t sound like such a bad idea.
Here is Barnes’ ideas for what should happen:

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array robert108

    Rob: I think we win when we stick with our conservative principles.  IMO, a lot of the spending in this Administration was an attempt to beat the Dems at their own game.  Not good.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    By naming Joe Lieberman to the cabinet, Bush affords Republican Governor Jodi Rell to appoint his successor, thus increasing the GOP majority in the Senate.

    Lieberman is the rare voice of reason in the Democratic Party (at least foreign policy-wise).  As such, he is more of an asset in the Senate than in the Cabinet.

  • Bat One

    Free,

    Your observation about Lieberman in the Senate is true enough.  He is a thoughtful and reasonable man… except to those his own party, a faction of which, with the unofficial blessing of DNC chairman Dean, is trying to unseat him this fall. 

    Lieberman compromised many of his long-held postions on a variety of issues to accomodate his 2000 running mate, AlGore.  Gore, of course, demonstrated his public regard for Lieberman by knifing him in the back.

    I still maintain that as the Democratic party moves further and further to the left, accomoodating its radical "base," there is a corresponding vacuum left in the middle that the GOP has been only to willing to fill.   And as the GOP tent gets bigger, covering a broader expanse of the political spectrum, centrists like Lieberman  will find themselves more and more welcome in a party that does appreciate  their contribution to thoughtful consenual governance.

  • tom

    Very interesting.

  • Dave

    True, but they’re still all neo-conservative types who already agree with everything he’s saying.

  • robert108

    Actually, it’s politics, leftie style, which is why I don’t want the Prez to do it.  Style over substance, and all that.  You lefties have been doing it forever.

  • electnixon

    "True, but they’re still all neo-conservative types who already agree with everything he’s saying."

    der. 

    He could appoint me to the cabinet and you could still say that.  What would you expect, Hiliary in the cabinet?

  • robert108

    Heard Fred talk about this on Fox this afternoon, and his main reason was to give the MSM something to chew on while the Prez goes on with his agenda.  It’s kind of like distracting the Dobermans with some steak while you sneak into the mansion.  As a conservative, I don’t want to do anything for purely political purposes, but it would probably work.  The Dems would try to sabotage every appointment with their filibustering, and we could just get on with the business of making the country safe and prosperous. 

  • Dave

    When I read the headline, I thought Barnes would be advocating a new set of advisors for Bush–people who weren’t friends who already agreed with him. His plan instead is just to shift everyone’s title around.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    If Lieberman leaves his seat we get a Republican appointed.  I don’t see where it is a bad move.

    Cause then we have a Conneticut Republican there.

    Cheney a neocon?  Now that’s funny.

    What else would he be? 

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    Lieberman is a neo-con?

    No, he is part of a dying breed – Thinking Democrats.

    Just because you support the war in Iraq doesn’t make you a neo-con.

    That is true, thought it could point to neo-con-ish tendencies.   

  • Bat One

    Fed Barnes’ plan has an unspoken advantage.  By naming Joe Lieberman to the cabinet, Bush affords Republican Governor Jodi Rell to appoint his successor, thus increasing the GOP majority in the Senate.

    As for filibusters by the Dems over the new appontees, there is always the "nuclear/constitutional" option, not to mention recess appointments, such as ha worked so well with Ambassador Bolton at the UN, and Judge Bill Pryor at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. 

  • robert108

    Rob: I meant using the same tactics as the Dems use;  spending was an example of that.

  • robert108

    Dave: If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

    Free: Since he’s been a conservative since probably before you were born, neo=new.  Get it?

    Rob: Well, he got one thing right;  Lieberman is Jewish. 

  • http://www.moderninstances.com/ modern instances

    We lefties have been saying this for years, all of a sudden it’s a good idea?

  • robert108

    Cheney a neocon?  Now that’s funny.

  • Dave

    Knowing Robert108, Cheney’s probably a Socialist.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I think we win when we stick with our conservative principles.  IMO, a lot of the spending in this Administration was an attempt to beat the Dems at their own game.

    Yeah, but we’re not talking about spending.  Really all we’re talking about is some old faces in new positions.  I think it would help.

    And I’m still holding out hope for Condi as a candidate in 2008. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    That’s not exactly true, Davey.  Barnes is advocating bringing Lieberman in as Sec. of State and getting a new Sec. of Treasury, Chief of Staff and a replacement for Rove.

    Those are some pretty significant changes alongside the "shuffling" of Condi and Cheney. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Lieberman is the rare voice of reason in the Democratic Party (at least foreign policy-wise).  As such, he is more of an asset in the Senate than in the Cabinet.

    The Dems aren’t listening to reason right now.  They’re out to get him out of the Senate.  He’s got some stiff competition for his seat from his own party.

    If Lieberman leaves his seat we get a Republican appointed.  I don’t see where it is a bad move. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    True, but they’re still all neo-conservative types who already agree with everything he’s saying.

    Lieberman is a neo-con?  That’s news to me.

    Just because you support the war in Iraq doesn’t make you a neo-con.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Robert, I wouldn’t mind seeing Condi positioned as VP for a run in 2008.

    I also wouldn’t mind seeing the lefties gnash their teeth with Lieberman as Sec. of State.

    Sometimes you have to play the political game, and I think right now would be a good time for Bush. 

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development