Former Obama Aides Threaten Democracy By Opening Pro-Democrat Political Group

Late last year, just before the election, the left was railing against groups with anonymous contributors spending money on political activities. “The American people deserve to know who’s trying to sway their elections,” said the President. “You can’t stand by and let the special interests drown out the voices of the American people.”

He called these groups, “not just a threat to Democrats, that’s a threat to our democracy.”

But now two former members of his administration have gone out established the exact sort of group Obama was railing against.

“We don’t control outside groups,” White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters today on Air Force One, as the president flew from Washington, DC, to Tuscaloosa, Alabama. “These are not people working for the administration.”

Carney was referring to Priorities USA and Priorities USA Action, the new outside groups formed by former White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton and Sean Sweeney, who served as chief of staff to then-White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. Priorities USA Action will register itself in the tax code as a “social welfare group,” which does not require the disclosure of donors. Or, as Burton and Sweeney put it in a press release: “Priorities USA Action is an Independent Expenditure PAC that supports candidates who will advance policies that provide the strongest and most sound outcomes for middle class families.”

I guess it’s ok when liberals do it. Though, to be clear, I don’t have a problem with these groups. I think we’re too hung up on who is saying things as opposed to what is being said.

If a group of citizens or businesses or organizations want to pool their resources in order to support a certain political agenda or message, why shouldn’t they be allowed to do that?

This is still a free country with free speech, right? And while disclosure of contributions isn’t necessarily a prohibition on speech, why should private individuals/organizations spending their own money on political speech have to disclose anything?

Rob Port is the editor of In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters.

Related posts

  • SigFan

    Just another group of lefty loons to add to the MoveOn, Think Progress, Media Matters and all the rest of the thinly disguised democrat/socialist organizations. They can call it whatever they want, people know what they really are – shills for the left.

    • $8194357

      Rules that will apply to everyone except the leftists…Marx, Alinsky, ect. ect. Hold your target to a set of rules you intend to break as the ends will justify the means….Play Ball!

  • VocalYokel

    What can one expect from an administration that wants complete disclosure of your political contributions when applying for a Federal loan?

  • Mike Adamson

    It’s a problem that partisans of all parties face…should methods one believes are wrong be used when they’re legal and the other guy uses them. My inclination is to say that full disclosure is important and should be followed but if the law doesn’t agree and some Republicans take full advantage of that then who can blame some Democrats for following suit?