Five Obama Scandals You Won’t Read About In the Mainstream ObamaMedia


The Lightworker’s whole presidency has essentially been one big scandal (Chrysler, missile defense, bribes to buy votes for ObamaCare) but these five are, well, the current ones.

Scandal 1: Fast and Furious. You might have heard of this one. It involved allowing thousands of guns to “walk” across the U.S. border into Mexico during 2009 and 2010, not coincidentally the height of that country’s drug war so far. One of those guns turned up in the hands of a Mexican drug cartel operator, at the murder scene of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Another has been linked to the murder of U.S. Customs Agent Jaime Zapata. So this scandal has an American body count. Fast and Furious also has a Mexican body count that may get up into the hundreds. While the shills in the mainstream media ran shady poll after shadier poll to tell America that the presidential race is over, Univision scooped them, discovering that Fast and Furious operated well beyond Arizona and that some of its guns turned up in all kinds of heinous crimes, including massacres of Mexicans. …

Scandal 2: Kathleen Sebelius breaks federal law, keeps her job. In February 2012, Secretary of Health and Human Services (that’s a federal position, just in case you’re not up on your civics) Kathleen Sebelius openly electioneered on government time in her official capacity during a visit to North Carolina. The Hatch Act, a federal law, expressly forbids such activity. The department she heads decided to cover her actions up by re-badging her appearance as a personal one, and had her pay some money to cover expenses. All of that constitutes an active cover-up. An investigation found that Sebelius has indeed violated the Hatch Act, which, as I already mentioned, is not a mere suggestion or guideline — it’s a federal law. Federal officials who are found in violation of the Hatch Act tend to get fired quickly. But Kathleen Sebelius not only has not been fired, President Obama has already appeared with her on the campaign trail since she was found to have violated the law.

The Hatch Act is very serious law. It was written so that government officials could not abuse their power over subordinates for political reasons. By keeping Sebelius on the job, Obama has effectively gutted the Hatch Act and declared open season by higher-ranking government officials on lower-ranking ones.

Scandal 3. Obama administration leaks sensitive national security information for political purposes. In a series of stories that were published in the New York Times, and in a movie production that was set to make a two-hour pre-election infomercial for President Obama, a person or persons within the administration leaked all kinds of sensitive national security information to the media. These persons leaked the names of active Navy SEAL special operators to Hollywood producers, they leaked details of ongoing cyber operations against Iran, and they leaked details about how the president decides when and where to kill terrorists. None of this information should have leaked. …

Scandal 4. Obama administration tells defense contractors to violate federal law. Bonus: Obama administration says it will use taxpayer dollars to pay any government fines incurred. This scandal is still ongoing, and it could be a big one. The Obama administration entered into a spending deal with Congress, by which automatic budget cuts will start slicing away unless the politicians act to stop them and find other places to cut or raise revenue. Some of the biggest cuts will hit defense contractors. Those contractors are required by federal law to inform their workers if layoffs may be close at hand. Thanks to sequestration, layoffs are close at hand unless the politicians hammer out a deal, which they haven’t done. So Lockheed was set to send out the pink slips, but on Friday and then against Monday the Obama administration told them not to. That command is in violation of federal law. …

Scandal 5: Libya  The short version of the Libya scandal goes like this. President Barack Obama has been skipping more than half of his Presidential Daily Briefings. His State Department sent an ambassador to war-torn Libya, but did no threat assessment before handing him a consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Benghazi isn’t exactly a tourist destination. In the post-Gaddafi Libya that Obama helped create via a war of dubious legality, Benghazi is a lawless hotbed of al-Qaeda and related terrorist activity. The consulate in Benghazi was given no Marine protection and in fact did not have the standard security arrangements at all.

Enjoy America.

Related posts

  • mikemc1970

    The Libya scandal is still ongoing. It’s getting deeper and deeper. It not only appears now that the Ambassador was begging for increased security and being refused. The State Department refused to get involved in a dispute between the contractual security groups, Blue Mountain UK and Blue Mountain Libya. The UK group claims the Libya group wasn’t providing adequate security either.

    Looks like we are getting a much better look at the negligent attitude about security in Libya and how the pleas of the personnel for better security were going completely unheeded.

  • $8194357

    Can we add that the media don’t care Barry has not released any bona fides?

  • Harold

    Five Obama scandals you won’t read about in the major media outlets, its more like none you’ll ever read about in those marxists news organizations.

  • $8194357

    Bloody fingerprints indicate at least Americans was still alive when
    dragged from the embassy building.

    The body count piles up under Obama’s pro-jihadist policy.

    The attack on our embassy was an act of war.
    The slaughter of our US ambassador and three diplomats was an act of war.
    The President blamed America. The President blamed the Constitution. Obama blamed the first amendment.

    This is high treason.
    The enemedia exalts treason as patriotism,
    while demonizing freedom lovers and patriots.

    America, it is past midnight.

    U.S. Embassy in Libya asked for extra security, request denied”
    October 2, 2012
    Washington Examiner

    House investigators warned Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to expect a hearing into their finding that that American staff at the U.S. Embassy in Libya had their request for additional security denied by Washington officials.

    “Based on information provided to the Committee by individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya, the attack that claimed the ambassador’s life was the latest in a long line of attacks on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months leading up to September 11, 2012,”

    House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and subcommittee chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, wrote Clinton today.

    They dismissed out-of-hand the suggestion that the attack ever could have been regarded as a spontaneous protest gone awry.

    “In addition, multiple U.S. federal government officials have confirmed to the Committee that, prior to the September 11 attack, the U.S. mission in Libya made repeated requests for increased security in Benghazi,”

    Issa and Chaffetz added (my emphasis).
    “The mission in Libya, however, was denied these resources by officials in Washington.”

    The committee noted 13 “security threats” in Benghazi, including an attempt to assassinate the British ambassador to Libya.

    UPDATE: Rusty Weiss:

    Did the White House Cover Up Ambassador’s Murder Because They
    Were Warned of Attacks Months in Advance?

    Multiple Israeli newspapers say the White House knew of threats on September 4th. The State Department issued a memo on the 6th stating that there were no credible threats. The consulate was attacked on the 11th. The State Department scrubbed that memo on the 12th.

    If we had actual journalists in this country,
    this would be an end-game scandal.

    End quote

    Pravda dog wagin the world…

  • $8194357


    A British Navy Destroyer stops four Muslims in a row boat, rowing towards Brighton .
    The captain gets on the loud hailer and shouts – “Ahoy, small craft, where are you heading?”

    One of the Muslims stands up and shouts, “We are invading England !”

    The crew of the Destroyer all start laughing and when the captain finally stops laughing, he
    gets back on the loud hailer and says “Just the four of you?”

    The Muslim stands up again and shouts,

    “No, we’re the last four.
    The rest are already there!”

  • HG

    No Scandal, but it is notably absent from media reports:
    Romney could be the first hispanic President. Romney’s dad was born in Mexico. That makes him just as Hispanic as NM Gov. Richardson whose mother was born in Mexico and father, in America.
    Just sayin’.
    This could also help explain why only the Mexican media, Univision, has bother to interview Obama candidly or report on “fast and furious”.

    • Gern Blanston

      If Mitt were the Democrat, we’d be hearing all about this potentially historic election.

      • HG

        Very true.
        That Romney isn’t playing that card says a lot about his character.

  • $8194357
  • $8194357

    Does anyone know what the 4th stage of deconstruction is?

    We are in the third stage “crisis” tipping over into the 4th stage fast…

    Normalization its called….
    When the targeted folks start getting used to
    the facist boot upon its neck….

    DHS has been busy “fusing” related organizations or
    “tieng the facist boots”
    to get them ready to start stomping necks….

    By the way…side point…The traditional islamic “stomp” of shame starts on the neck by the soul of the foot….When they are done?
    The whole body is as flat as a pancake…Seen a video on it once..
    Funny how nazi srtyle facism and islamic ritual are so close huh..

    anyway..back to the DHS…

    Those of us who voiced con­cerns and crit­i­cism over the
    Depart­ment of Home­land Security/FBI imple­men­ta­tion of so-called Fusion
    Cen­ters around the U.S., were rou­tinely dis­missed as alarmists and
    irrel­e­vant. Now the chickens have come home to roost with national head­lines
    over the scan­dalous results pro­duced by these uncon­sti­tu­tional spy

    The reason it hit the news is due to a damning report issued by the Senate
    Home­land Secu­rity and Gov­ern­mental Affairs that declares in its Exec­u­tive
    Sum­mary on page one,

    “Sharing terrorism-related infor­ma­tion between state, local and
    fed­eral offi­cials is cru­cial to pro­tecting the United States from another
    ter­rorist attack. Achieving this objec­tive was the moti­va­tion for Con­gress
    and the White House to invest hun­dreds of mil­lions of tax­payer dol­lars over
    the last nine years in sup­port of dozens of state and local fusion cen­ters
    across the United States. Con­gress directed the Depart­ment of
    Home­land Secu­rity (DHS) to lead this ini­tia­tive. A bipar­tisan
    inves­ti­ga­tion by the Per­ma­nent Sub­com­mittee on Inves­ti­ga­tions has
    found, how­ever, that DHS’ work with those state and local fusion
    cen­ters has not pro­duced useful intel­li­gence to sup­port fed­eral
    coun­tert­er­rorism efforts.

    “The Sub­com­mittee inves­ti­ga­tion found that DHS-assigned detailees to
    the fusion cen­ters for­warded “intel­li­gence” of uneven quality – often­times
    shoddy, rarely timely, some­times endan­gering cit­i­zens’ civil
    lib­er­ties and Pri­vacy Act pro­tec­tions, occa­sion­ally taken from
    already-published public sources, and more often than not unre­lated to
    ter­rorism.” [emphasis added]

    Starting in 2003, DHS has cre­ated 73 Fusion Cen­ters in the U.S., but actual
    loca­tions in each state were kept
    secret until early 2011. Cen­ters were to com­bine Fed­eral and local law
    enforce­ment resources along with pri­vate par­ties involved in public
    infra­struc­ture, in order to suck data from every pos­sible local source for
    com­put­er­ized analysis.

    What­ever Con­gress had in mind, it was NOT what DHS pro­ceeded to do,
    namely, create a behe­moth cit­izen spying exper­i­ment that was run without
    over­sight and a vir­tu­ally unlim­ited budget. DHS cannot recon­struct how much
    money they actu­ally spent, where it was spent and to whom it was given, but it
    is esti­mated to be a multi­bil­lion dollar boondoggle.

    The gist of “data fusion” is this: Take data from many diverse areas and
    data­bases, com­bine it into a single data­base (the “fusion” process) and then
    apply heuristic (arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence) pro­gram algo­rithms that infer
    who the bad guys might be. The problem is that it doesn’t work and
    ordi­nary, inno­cent cit­i­zens are easily pegged for being “sus­pi­cious” and
    then watched for crim­inal behavior.

    While Fusion Cen­ters failed Con­gress, they have not failed the
    Tech­nocrats within DHS. Tech­niques and tech­nology for data col­lec­tion and
    com­puter analysis have advanced by leaps and bounds and are now ready for
    prime-time imple­men­ta­tion on a more com­pre­hen­sive nation­wide basis.

    As the National Secu­rity Agency (NSA) com­pletes its $2 bil­lion mon­ster
    data center in Bluff­dale, Utah by the end of 2013, it will be ready to run a
    new gen­er­a­tion of soft­ware on its mas­sive array of super-computers. Plans
    for the data center include 100,000 square feet just for com­puters and an
    addi­tional 900,000 feet for other office space — that’s 23 acres of office
    space on 240 acres of fenced and guarded secret compound.

    U.S. Army Gen­eral Keith Alexander, who heads the NSA as well as the U.S.
    Cyber Com­mand, insisted in July 2012 that the data center will NOT be used to
    spy on Amer­ican cit­i­zens: “We don’t store data on U.S. cit­i­zens… That’s
    baloney. … That’s ludicrous.”

    When­ever I hear this kind of rhetoric, espe­cially when no sup­porting
    evi­dence is offered, I know for cer­tain that the oppo­site is most likely
    true: NSA will assemble the largest col­lec­tion of cit­izen data in his­tory.
    It will be the “mother of all fusion centers.”

    — —  —  —  —  —  —  — 

  • $8194357

    by BareNakedIslam
    A ruling handed down on September 13th by the D.C. District Federal Court has finally made clear what many have known for years–that the Obama Administration’s Iran policy was initiated and advanced by a group with illicit, hidden ties to the Iranian Regime and financed by George Soros.

    For the U.S., the consequences of this game of intrigue played by the Administration’s hand-picked, Iranian representatives are summed up in this statement by Barack Obama: “I’ve made it clear that the United States respects the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and is not interfering with Iran’s affairs.” And indeed, this is the path Barack Obama has followed. Not exactly reassuring words from a president charged with keeping the American public safe from a nuclear-bound administration of religious fanatics dedicated to our demise.

  • Ryderwriter

    I sure wish there were citations for these claims.