Say Anything Blog

FLASH: To be released at 10 AM ET on RASMUSSEN: Romney breaks out 15-point lead over Giuliani in NH; up from 9 a month ago; 3-point lead in September…

And this relates to the topic...how?

Flash: Romney Spambot Bill Mitchell revealed for the fraud he is! Makes irrelevant off topic posts for $$!

Bill: If you want to hype your candidate, drag your lazy ass over and start a reader blog (they’re free! They won’t cut into your $$ overhead from Romney!)
That way you can post news bulletins, puff pieces and your opinion to your heart’s content! You can defend your candidate (if your ADD allows) or simply post and take the arrows.

But your propensity to inject Romney into every discussion simply reveals you to be a Spambot and perhaps we should conclude that Romney is an empty suit by association??
Frankly, I think Romney deserves better than that!

Those who think the party or the country, will be “taught a lesson” by handing the levers of power over to the liberals will learn a lesson, but it will be at the expense of our country and her liberties. And there are no guarantees that the party or the country will come out stronger, more conservative or better positioned to win elections against the incumbent liberals.

Rob: I have been saying this for decades. The whole abortion situation, as it exists today, is a wholesale violation of Equal Protection; no question about it.
The real problem is that abortion on demand is a key Dem issue; they will never let go of it.  It is used to control the female vote.  They call it “a woman’s right to choose”, instead of “feticide as a method of birth control”, and thus sell it to women as a method of them being powerful.  I guess killing your child without consequence is powerful, in a way.  Denying choice to men is just a bonus for the angry, man-hating feminists.

"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

What is wrong with the court system when they’re worried about financial support and but actually make up the constitution to say these children have no right to live?

Ah yes, no unalienable rights for the unborn child. 

Kinda takes all the meaning out of unalienable, no?

The whole abortion situation, as it exists today, is a wholesale violation of Equal Protection; no question about it.

It’s rather interesting that the whole legal concept of equality goes out the window when “it’s for the kids.” That is if the kid gets to be a kid.

The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.

I guess killing your child without consequence is powerful, in a way.  Denying choice to men is just a bonus for the angry, man-hating feminists.

R108,

Still, looking at those “angry, man-hating feminists” ya’ gotta wonder that any of them would worry about the possibility of getting pregnant.  I don’t know about other guys, but I damn sure know I have never been that desperate… or that drunk.

“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Still, looking at those “angry, man-hating feminists” ya’ gotta wonder that any of them would worry about the possibility of getting pregnant. I
don’t know about other guys, but I damn sure know I have never been that desperate… or that drunk.

Two things: First, many women take advantage of the tactics created by the man-hating feminists when it is to their advantage, while denying that they really are feminists.
Second, many man-hating feminists use deception to get what they want, just like many other women do.

I wasn’t referring to the man-hating feminists as direct sex partners, but when they railroaded Roe v Wade through SCOTUS, it is my opinion that at least some of their motivation was to strike a blow against men and masculinity.  Just doing their bit to take down “the patriarchy”, doncha know?

"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

Still, looking at those “angry, man-hating feminists” ya’ gotta wonder that any of them would worry about the possibility of getting pregnant. I
don’t know about other guys, but I damn sure know I have never been that desperate… or that drunk.

Is this just in general or are y’all talking about a specific picture?

Hmmmm, I would come to a completely opposite conclusion.  That the 19 year old young man from Lufkin was railroaded by the right wingers who just HAD to define an unborn as a person.  If the law were correct (it ain’t a child until it is born, just check the tax code) there would have been no charges against him.

In their blind lust to make the world live by their rules, the “right” is implementing their own version of Shariah.

Of course, that is becaus Jesus came here to make all men live under the Law, and had nothing to do with the Gospel of Grace and Mercy. [/sarcasm]

TRex

I also write on http://www.combateffective.us
Where dissent is encouraged - But the amoral
liberal collective appeasement mindset is not

(it ain’t a child until it is born, just check the tax code)

So, the tax code is now the arbiter of your morality?  I pity you.  Your conspiracy rant is worthy of a tinfoil hat.  What shows how wrong you are is that the mother suffered absolutely no consequences, although she was equally responsible for the human fetuses.
This is “feminist law”, no doubt about it.  The feminists are pro-abortion(for women only).
If it has human DNA, it’s human.  Duh.

"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

I am still waiting for an answer to a rather simple question:

How can the fetus in the womb be considered a human being as a matter of law if it is killed by accident or an act of homicide; but if an abortionist deliberately terminates its life it is only a mass of tissue, not unlike a tumor?

How about this one, if allowed to come to term will that fetus be anything other than a human being? Then how can it only be a mass of tissue a second before birth and a human being a second later?

Otherwise, this is all a matter of liberal semantical gymnastics used to justify the deliberate, whosale slaughter of wholly innocent human beings for selfish, mostly economic reasons, a form of murderous birth control after the fact by incredibly lazy and selfish human beings, and supported by an amoral ruling class.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

The tax code is not the arbitor of my morality, but it is an arbitor of the law of the land.  And I rufuse to confuse the two, as some have done.  What I find morally repugnant is quite different than what I believe the law should get involved with.

I believe Christians should spend more effort on insureing we have a country that is not hostile to our way of life, (freedom to pray, spread the Gospel, and teach our own children in our own schools) and less time worrying about whether or not those outside the Church are abiding by our moral code.

I also write on http://www.combateffective.us
Where dissent is encouraged - But the amoral
liberal collective appeasement mindset is not

The tax code is not the arbitor of my morality, but it is an arbitor of the law of the land.

Only the tax law of the land.  It’s about accounting and the govt grabbing our money, not whether a human fetus is human or not; that is determined by DNA.  If it weren’t Politically Incorrect, the tax code could easily be changed to include a pregnant woman as a tax deduction, then remove that deduction if the pregnancy ended.  In other words, it’s simply an arbitrary dividing line, not a comment on the humanity of the human fetus.  Get it?

"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

Can you imagine how impossible it would be to administer a tax program dealing with unborn children.

Claiming that the tax code is anything but the tax code is silly.

The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.

Can you imagine how impossible it would be to administer a tax program dealing with unborn children.

The only “impossible” part would be dealing with the powerful abortion lobby.  In practice, it would be just as easy to present the IRS with the results of your pregnancy test as it would be to show them a birth certificate.  No problem. 
Taxes in this country are mostly about self-reporting, with the threat of being audited the only bar to dishonesty.
Most people cheat on their taxes to some extent, and starting the child deduction with pregnancy would change nothing in that respect.

"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

No I was just concerned with the whole process of a)when did she get pregnant b) what do you do if there is a miscarriage c)what if they lied about the whole thing?

With a live birth there’s usually a birth certificate and other easily obtained proof.

Was the kid conceived on December 31st or Jan 1?

The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.

With a live birth there’s usually a birth certificate and other easily obtained proof.

My point here was not to get into a detailed analysis of how such rules might be enforced, but simply to suggest that the tax code is arbitrary, when you come right down to it.  If the rules were changed, the mechanisms of verification would be created.  Demand creates supply.
The lying problem is the same; people claim dependents that they don’t have, all the time.
My overall point was to refute the contention that the tax code somehow defined humanity or personhood.  That is simply ridiculous.

"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

TW: There are changes to the tax code just about every fiscal year.  That’s the real nightmare.

"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

TW: There are changes to the tax code just about every fiscal year.  That’s the real nightmare.

No the real nightmare is that it’s usually for the worse.

The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.

No the real nightmare is that it’s usually for the worse.

Is there any taxation that’s “for the better”?

"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

In theory it could be made more better.

The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.