Fawning Talking Heads Compare Obama To FDR, Bush To Hoover

Neither comparison is warranted.

During live coverage of Barack Obama’s inauguration at 9:30AM on Tuesday, CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric spoke to historian Douglas Brinkley, who observed: “And it reminds me of Franklin Roosevelt in March of 1933 in this regard, I mean the economy was in tatters, Herbert Hoover was an unpopular president, President Bush is not very popular, and he was able to galvanize people with his speech, FDR, move the nation, you know to have nothing — you know, to fight for all of the civil rights and to start pushing forward the hundred days of the New Deal. And so you see the echoes of that.” On the January 11 Sunday Morning program, Brinkley declared Bush in the “…the very bottom-rung of American Presidents.”
Brinkley’s comment was prompted by Couric remarking: “…a confluence of events that will make him perhaps one of the most powerful presidents in history. It’s hard to predict an administration and how successful it will be, but he really is starting off things in an enviable position, isn’t he?” Later, Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer shared his thoughts on that point: “But the interesting thing, Katie, is when we stop and think about it, our greatest presidents have always come to us during the worst of times. If history’s any guide, the pieces are in place here for the making of a great president.” On Monday’s Early Show, Schieffer compared Obama to Abraham Lincoln.

First of all, we are not on the verge of another Great Depression. So trying to cast Bush in the role of an economically inept Hoover, and Obama in the role as the nation’s tax-and-spend savior, is just absurd.
Second, while FDR’s economic policies were misguided and ultimately prolonged the depression the country was going through during his administration, on foreign policy at least the man had the cojones to use America’s power to fight evil in the world.
Something Obama is lacking. Obama may want to play the role of FDR, going about the country and throwing our tax dollars about on things like government make-work programs to employ the unemployed, but he isn’t fit to carry FDR’s shoes. At least on foreign policy.
But he’s going to take a stab at re-creating FDR’s economic policies. And that’s something this country can’t afford right now.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array andophiroxia

    Well Obama is a lot like FDR on that considering he’s trying to create jobs via infrastructure like FDR did.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Neither comparison is warranted.

    I don’t know about that. Bush and Hoover have a lot in common.

    And Obama may well be a new FDR, which would suck for the country.

  • Pfeh

    A good straight-outta-the-40′s Manhattan Project-ish program to develop the Polywell fusion device would be a welcome sight for my eyes.

    Heck, how about a reboot of the IFR that then President Clinton and Sen. John Kerry cancelled?

    Instead of repainting government buildings. If he’s going to spend a ton more money, it could at least be something that has a hope of creating a greater benefit than the cost.

    I’m not holding my breath, though.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_Fast_Reactor

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    that’s actually a lib media attempt at being fair and balanced….the normal MSM take is Obama = the Messiah, Bush = serpent

    let’s just declare Obama our President For Life and get that ‘lil detail cleared up right now.

    happy Inauguration Day

  • Dino

    Comparing bush to Hoover isn’t fair.

    To Hoover.

    Bush was FAR worse. His arrogance and ideological rigidity have badly damaged this country. He was much more divisive than Hoover and had planned all along to break this country anx turn it into the free-for-all capitalist fantasyland of his dreams.

    He is an evil man whose still beating heart supports the atheists’ views.

    May he burn in Hell with reagan.

  • andophiroxia

    Bush was FAR worse. His arrogance and ideological rigidity have badly damaged this country. He was much more divisive than Hoover and had planned all along to break this country anx turn it into the free-for-all capitalist fantasyland of his dreams.

    Let’s take out Bush and insert ‘Dino’, then replace ‘capitalist’ with ‘national socialism’.

    He is an evil man whose still beating heart supports the atheists’ views.

    This is from someone that advocated that Ayers should have ‘done more’.

    May he burn in Hell with reagan.

    Wait, I thought you were for atheism, or hating Christians, xtians, or whatever lameassed terminology that your fevered brain can think of.

    Little man.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development