Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Farmers Demanding Drought Relief

I see that Kent Conrad was at a rally to whip up a bunch of anger at the fact that Congress isn't passing emergency agriculture aid for North Dakota farmers suffering from dry weather.

There are a couple of things worth noting about this.

First off, where do these farmers get off "demanding" drought aid? Seems to me that droughts are a part of doing business in the agriculture industry. Why should taxpayers have to fork over money because these farmers weren't prepared to deal with a season of adverse weather conditions? Farming is business, and every type of business has risks associated with it. In farming weather is one of those risks.

Most other types of business people have to deal with the hardships that arise in their fields without demanding hundreds of millions of dollars in aid from the government. Why should farmers be any different? Will Americans starve if these farmers don't get their aid? No. Will any of these farmers go out of business if they don't get their aid? Maybe, maybe not. Most of them probably won't, and those that do will likely be casualties of their own inability to plan for predictable setbacks like dry weather.

Another thing worth noting is that these demands for agriculture aid occur almost every single year without fail. At what point do we recognize that it is the farmer's responsibility, as a private business person, to prepare for and deal with the hardships that occur within the ag industry? Shouldn't we be encouraging these farmers to come up with business strategies that keep them from depending on the federal government for bailouts every year, year after year?

I'm sure that Kent Conrad and other political leaders who join these farmers in demanding agriculture aid every year are proud of themselves for caring about hard-working farmers...but do they really care or are they just using government funds to pander to a constituency?

Seems to me that a truly caring political leader would be figuring out why it is that these farmers need government aid every year, year after year and then address those issues.

I know that Conrad's competitor in this year's election has some ideas for making farmers less dependent on federal aid and more dependent on themselves. I think that's the direction we need to go, because these yearly battles for government aid aren't good for anyone.

Comments

I guess we should be giving taxpayer-sponsored aid to any business that suffers from bad management, then.  Actually, going out of business is what happens to businesses that can’t cut the mustard(farming joke), and is what protects us from bad business and inefficient use of resources.


"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

robert108 on August 23, 2006 at 10:54 pm
Rob
Rob
19492 comments
Send a private message

Exactly Robert.

It seems to me that bailing out these farmers year after year is just propping up the bad business practices that leave the farmers unable to deal with routine hardships like a relatively mild drought.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on August 23, 2006 at 10:59 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

I’ve been amazed by how such a conservative state has such a liberal Representation in Congress. ..."Cognitive dissonance” comes to mind.

Without farm subsidies and pandering, I doubt the Democrats would have such a monopoly over ND Congressional politic.  Yet one more reason to get rid of farm subsidies and such inneficient and ineffective government spending.

how did they first get elected in what I would like to know..

aNONOMISLY on August 23, 2006 at 11:09 pm
Rob
Rob
19492 comments
Send a private message

Anon, they get elected because while ND is a conservative state on most issue...it is also a very populist state on others.

The idea that these farmers need federal aid has become so ingrained that anyone suggesting otherwise is scorned and derided.  If Republicans want to replace the Democrats in federal Congress they have to pander to the ag industry, and that means support subsidies.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on August 23, 2006 at 11:22 pm
Avatar for J. Nelsen

There was no coverage of the rally outside of North Dakota and South Dakota (and some ag publications, I suppose). No policymakers noticed, and Congress sure paid no attention.

The rally was intended to show North Dakotans that its elected officials care and that the Farmers Union is effective.

Wrong.

J. Nelsen on August 24, 2006 at 06:52 am
Avatar for The Whistler

I’ve heard from a lot of farmers that the crops aren’t that bad.  Of course I haven’t talked to farmers in the Bisrmarck Dickinson areas.

Why don’t we wait to get the crops in to see how they were?

The Whistler on August 24, 2006 at 07:09 am
Rob
Rob
19492 comments
Send a private message

Whistler, because the crops might not prove to be that bad and Kent Conrad would be denied the opportunity to vote his constituency a bunch of money out of the treasury.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on August 24, 2006 at 07:39 am
Avatar for The Whistler

Oh, sorry.

The Whistler on August 24, 2006 at 07:43 am
Avatar for KevindF

Won’t this increase the deficit that Gaylord is always yammering about?

KevindF on August 24, 2006 at 10:21 am
Avatar for The Whistler

I’m sure he’ll find a way to raise taxes on farmers to make up the difference.

The Whistler on August 24, 2006 at 10:26 am
Avatar for Puzzlefeet

ok, I want to know how many of those farmers talked about the need to get rid of the Paris Hilton tax because they were gonna lose their farms, I’ll bet not one of them did.

Puzzlefeet on August 25, 2006 at 04:29 pm
Avatar for JJ

I just found this blog topic in a search for something else. I’m a farmer so would like to enlighten you all on a few things.

Yes, in many respects, farming is just like any other business. We fill out balance sheets, pay employees, etc.

We are very different in other respects. Other manufacturers pay wholesale for items used in production of their products. We pay extremely high retail prices for everything we use in production of our crops.

Retail stores pay wholesale prices for the items they sell. We pay retail for EVERYTHING we use.

The earnings of a professional farmer with a lifetime of experience (college degree or not), is compensated at minimum wage in the courts. He is not considered a professional, only a common laborer.

Yet, we must be up on everything from technology to mechanics, accounting to bio-technology. We make decisions every day involving many thousands of dollars, usually based upon hope as much as hard facts.

Other businesses can review their costs and price their products accordingly, assuring a measure of profit for what they sell. The prices we receive for our products are determined by weather, men in suits who have never touched the soil, and markets controlled by governments and commodity traders.

You all expect to go to the grocery store and purchase safe, top quality produce and food products at the lowest grocery prices in the world.

Rob, “Will Americans starve if these farmers don’t get their aid?”

Probably not. But do you know what country your food will come from if not from American farms? Do you know what the safety standards are in that country? Do you want to depend on a food source from other countries like we do for fuel?

As long as the government controls our profit margins, they can pay for the privilege. We would far rather determine our prices by the standards that other businesses do and then you can go to the store and buy a loaf of bread for $8 and a gallon of milk for $10.

My point is that there is a lot more to the farm subsidy programs than just keeping a badly managed farm in business. Even with the subsidies, which are not nearly as great as you seem to think, a badly managed farm will fail, just like any other business.

The amount of money the average farm receives in subsidies is far less than you are led to believe by stories in the press. It cost us $200,000 to plant and harvest 2000 acres in 2006. Our total farm subsidies were $27,000. We had severe drought conditions that held yields below average to poor. Federal crop insurance (another joke!) cost us more than it paid out, even with major drought losses. Crop insurance loss “formulas” are skewed to eliminate the loss on paper, thereby reducing the payout. 

In the distant past, we were able to absorb a bad year or two with our own cash and assets. In recent years, the cost of just one crop is enough to wipe us out due to our extremely high production costs.

And guess what else? We do not have company health and dental plans. Those of us who can, buy private health insurance and can’t even get dental insurance. Our health insurance now carries a $5,000 deductible to keep the premium affordable. I am now missing 5 molars because it is more important to pay for fertilizer than the dentist.

The average family farm is being squeezed out of business by a few ambitious mega-farmers and the large food corporations. I’ll come back to visit you when our entire food supply is totally controlled by the government and these large corporations, importing what we can no longer afford to produce here in America. You will all be singing a different tune then!

JJ on February 4, 2007 at 10:55 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.