Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Sunday, April 06, 2008

Failing Washington DC Schools Getting $25,000/Student In Funding

The day before yesterday I wrote a post about “dropout factory” schools in urban areas, and noted in the post that funding isn’t exactly the problem in a lot of those schools.  Today I got an email from Andrew Coulson, Director of The Cato Institute Center for Educational Freedom, highlighting a Washington Post column he’s written which details the massive amounts of funding failing urban schools in Washington DC get:

Saw your blog post on the dropout crisis the other day, and thought you’d be interested to hear how expensive failing urban public schools have become. I’ve got a piece in the Washington Post today in which I add up all sources of DC k-12 funding and divide the total by enrollment to determine real per pupil spending. It comes out to $25k per pupil annually, in the same ballpark as tuition at the elite Sidwell Friends school attended by Chelsea Clinton during the 1990s. Given how disastrously DC public schools perform, and the fact that many of them are falling apart, I recommend just giving parents a choice of independent schools (whose total per pupil spending I estimate to be about $10k less than in the District’s public schools). I knew the number was going to be high, but it shocked even me. I imagine it’ll stun your readers, too.

$25,000 per student means $500,000, a half-million dollars, for one classroom of twenty students.

That amount apparently isn’t enough for the unionized teachers in Washington DC’s school system to provide a decent education, and that is very shocking.

Read Coulson’s entire column, and the next time someone tells you that funding is the problem with failing schools remember Washington DC and its half-a-million-dollar classrooms.

Comments

This story has bothered me since it broke.  Why have we allowed this to happen and why are not more folks upset..?  Especially the minority communities where this has hit the hardest?

The right should use this to hammer liberalism into the cofin in which it belongs.  This is similar to racism as we sit back and watch black and hispanic children start adulthood without much of a future because of a lack of education.  These are failed policies for decades that have been forced on children. 

This issues shows liberals as racists.  They want minorities to be poor and uneducated.


atease

atease on April 6, 2008 at 09:30 am

There is no link between school funding and academic achievement.
The Kansas city school system proved that years ago.

Kevin on April 6, 2008 at 10:11 am

Democrats solution to everything:  throw money at it.  Like throwing gasoline on a burning fire.  First you must contain and control it.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on April 6, 2008 at 11:16 am

But there is a link between liberal policies and failing schools..


atease

atease on April 6, 2008 at 11:17 am

The notion that throwing more money into schools will make them better is ridiculous.  My parents home schooled me until high school and my test scores were way above the averages.  I’m not bragging but you don’t need to spend a lot of money to give a child a good education so they can succeed in life as an adult.



A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

dougee on April 6, 2008 at 01:18 pm

dougee, we homeschool our kids too..


atease

atease on April 6, 2008 at 02:11 pm

Nice atease, me and my younger sisters were homeschooled until my sophmore year when my mom wanted to go back to work.  I did go to band at the public school starting in middle school so I knew most of the kids in my grade anyways.  My parents really pushed me and my sisters and it made public school really easy for me when I started The strong work ethic has also helped me in my engineering classes at NDSU.

Homeschooling isn’t bad like many people think as I’m sure you know well.



A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

dougee on April 6, 2008 at 02:57 pm
Avatar for Old&InTheWay

me and my younger sisters were homeschooled until my sophmore year when my mom wanted to go back to work.

It’s probably just a generational difference in conversation and audience perception....but if you’re trying to make a persuasive argument on the merits of homeschooling, you might want to rethink your use of pronouns.

Old&InTheWay on April 7, 2008 at 05:36 pm

My sisters and I.  Happy?  I am majoring in engineering and not getting an English phd and I usually don’t proofread my posts



A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

dougee on April 7, 2008 at 07:35 pm
Avatar for Old&InTheWay

Happy?  I am majoring in engineering and not getting an English phd

Happy that you do know the correct form? Yes....Happy that you equate basic grammar rules that should be mastered by the 6th grade with a doctorate in English? Less so....
Old&InTheWay on April 8, 2008 at 12:21 pm
Avatar for Old&InTheWay

It comes out to $25k per pupil annually, in the same ballpark as tuition at the elite Sidwell Friends school attended by Chelsea Clinton during the 1990s.


Also in the same ballpark as the cost of every federal prisoner.  So which of these two expenditures is off mark?
Old&InTheWay on April 9, 2008 at 07:39 pm
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

Given that prisoners are on the taxpayer dole 24/7 while they’re incarcerated, clearly its the student spending that is off.

Though if you want to argue that we’re putting too many people in prison, I’d agree.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on April 9, 2008 at 07:57 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.