Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, August 08, 2008

Fading Unions Trying To Use Government Power To Remain In Existence

Glenn Spencer puts the coercion and thuggery behind the horribly misnamed “Employee Free Choice Act” into perspective.

Today, unions represent a scant 7.5 percent of private-sector workers, with the rest of their members employed in government, their only significant growth market. Demographically, the news is even worse: The largest single group of union members is between the ages of 45 and 54, nearing retirement — while just 6 percent of unionized workers are between 16 and 24.

Sadly, many unions seem to be choosing government power and restrictive legislation as their way out of the wilderness, instead of enhancing their value proposition. . . .

What makes this massive political spending so concerning is the element of coercion that lies behind labor’s political agenda. The centerpiece of that agenda is the Employee Free Choice Act, a masterpiece of Orwellian doublespeak.

The act would effectively strip workers of the protection of secret ballots in union certification elections. Replacing the privacy of the voting booth, workers would be asked to publicly sign cards indicating support for a union, exposing them to harassment and intimidation. Unions could badger workers repeatedly, at work and at home, to sign a card acquiescing to representation and, in most cases, employers would have limited ability to give workers their side of the story.

There’s not a lot of “free choice” in the “Employee Free Choice Act” and the unions like that just fine.

Comments

Avatar for Neo

A challenge to ”card check” from an unlikely source ...

Voting is an immense privilege.

That is why I am concerned about a new development that could deny this freedom to many Americans. As a longtime friend of labor unions, I must raise my voice against pending legislation I see as a disturbing and undemocratic overreach not in the interest of either management or labor.

The legislation is called the Employee Free Choice Act, and I am sad to say it runs counter to ideals that were once at the core of the labor movement. Instead of providing a voice for the unheard, EFCA risks silencing those who would speak.

The key provision of EFCA is a change in the mechanism by which unions are formed and recognized. Instead of a private election with a secret ballot overseen by an impartial federal board, union organizers would simply need to gather signatures from more than 50% of the employees in a workplace or bargaining unit, a system known as “card-check.” There are many documented cases where workers have been pressured, harassed, tricked and intimidated into signing cards that have led to mandatory payment of dues.

Neo on August 8, 2008 at 11:37 am

Rob, you are way too genteel on this issue.

The so-called Employee Free Choice Act is an outrageous assault on the American worker’s right of free choice, on the face of it!

Is it safe to assume that - next year, after making it’s way through a democrat controlled congress -President Obama would swiftly sign it into law?


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

“As a conservative, I will not be overly enthusiastic about voting for John McCain on November 4 - but I will be sprinting to the polling place to do so!”
Matthew May, conservative commentator, The American Spectator

pparets on August 8, 2008 at 11:52 am

Unions are known for and have a long history of violence and intimidation against innocent civilians.  They even kill their own who try and get elected.
United Mine Workers, early 1970s.  These people are downright disgusting.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on August 8, 2008 at 12:03 pm
Avatar for Jeugenen

NEO-UNIONIST EXPLOITATION OF BLUE-COLLAR REDNECKS AND SCHOOL TEACHERS (Ed.)

Marxist refugees from Nazi Germany and Marxist Russia, and their Neo-Marxist American born descendants, are the leading exploiters of America’s blue-collar rednecks and school teachers. They took advantage of the desire of the blue-collar rednecks and school teachers for more experienced representatives in bargaining with their governmental employers for better wages and benefits. Their Marxist revolutionary experience in tricking millions decent patriotic Russian Christians into slaughtering each other, in support of Bolshevik class warfare ideology, gave them an immediate advantage over local teacher and labor union leaders in American. But this success, historically, does not predict a final Neo-Marxist victory for the Neo-Unionists.

Hitler’s brilliant extermination of the Marxists, when they tried the same politically subversive tactics on the Germany People, suggests that the final outcome of the escalating American Cultural War against these exploitive Neo-Unionists promises to be interesting. Since the ultra-patriotic blue-collar redneck Christians instinctively put their ultimate trust in their God and their guns; and the vast majority of teachers, being patriotic and educated, are not susceptible to Neo-Marxist indoctrination; the Neo-Unionists have made a date with the patriotic political lynching mob.

From the very beginning, when they cunning usurped the power of the traditional labor and teacher unions, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the National Educational Association (NEA) have systematically indoctrinated millions of blue-collar rednecks and thousands school teachers with their Neo-Marxist ideology, and exploited them for propaganda work, votes, and money; and then used the many billions of dollars of legally extorted union fees to buy the services of Congressional prostitutes, to enact legislation subversive to Christian culture, patriotism, traditional family values, capitalism, democracy, and Constitutional rule of law.

Google: NEA Communism Weaver; and, SEIU Communism Stern.

Jeugenen on August 8, 2008 at 12:04 pm

Jeugenen.  I had not heard the part about the prostitutes and the NEA, but I have with the AFL-CIO and Democratic congressmen with underaged boys.  He died a few years ago, but others have continued it, BF.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on August 8, 2008 at 12:20 pm
Avatar for Jerry

Unions had their purpose.
Today they mostly stand in the way of much needed advancements in Education, Transportation, and Government, to name a few.

Jerry on August 8, 2008 at 03:47 pm

The promise from our resident union thug:

EFCA will be back.  The first time through was just the practice run, with majority voting for it.  2009 will come soon enough.

Union assholes (I repeat myself) will never stop their attempts at taking away choice.

likwidshoe on August 8, 2008 at 06:23 pm
Avatar for ec99

"Unions had their purpose.”

Yes they did.  And then it went down hill from there.  Some got infiltrated by the Mafia.  Others priced their members out of business.  Others couldn’t match what companies themselves offered workers.  With much of the traditional union-member labor jobs exported, unions are pretty much an anachronism.

ec99 on August 9, 2008 at 01:29 pm

With everything being made in China or outsourced anyway, why do we need unions? I believe in unions. However, I feel that the union officials should look at what is happening in the world and stop making ridiculous demands.

watashiwa on August 11, 2008 at 09:29 pm

“Unions had their purpose.”

Their only purpose is what it still is: redistribution of money into their coffers.  Unions have never increased productivity, nor have they succeed in increasing the capital of their members, only of the ruling elite, just like any other socialist entity.  The increase in capital ownership among Americans is due solely to the free enterprise economic system, and unions have only slowed down that process.
Unions thrive on class envy, and as the population grows more wealthy, that tactic becomes less successful.
This is why they support the invaders, and will throw American workers under the bus if they can ever get amnesty for the invaders.  Unions require a two-tier society.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on August 11, 2008 at 09:37 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.