Ethics You Can Believe In: Rangel Investigation Will Be Completed Just In Time For Congress To End

Hope ‘n change:

The House ethics panel has assured Speaker Nancy Pelosi that an investigation into the conduct of Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel, D-N.Y., will be completed by the time the current Congress goes out of business Jan. 3.
“In September, I called on the House ethics committee to look into issues raised by news reports on Chairman Rangel. . . . I have been assured the report will be completed by the end of this session of Congress, which concludes on January 3, 2009,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement released Wednesday.
The Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, as the House ethics panel is formally known, is conducting a probe of several matters concerning Rangel, including his failure to disclose income received from property he owns in the Dominican Republic.
New allegations came to light Tuesday, when The New York Times reported that Rangel had preserved a tax benefit for an oil-drilling company on the same day that he asked the head of that company to donate money to the Charles B. Rangel public service school at the City College of New York.
Rangel refuted the Times’ reporting; the newspaper’s editorial board called on Pelosi to remove him as head of the powerful tax writing committee.

Why do these politicians even bother investigating themselves? Does anyone honestly think that an ethics committee controlled by Democrats is going to come up with anything substantive about a fellow Democrat’s corruption? And vice-versa for Republicans?
I think we need a government body independent of Congress to execute these investigations.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    I think we need a government body independent of Congress to execute these investigations.

    Don’t hold your breath waiting for that.

  • http://northerngleaner.blogspot.com/ Gene

    WOW,

    We have just experienced a Spam that didn’t look like spam.

    Good work on someone’s part.

    I like Robb Thompson and even watch him sometimes on TV.

    He’s a good preacher. But, this was selling a book. He has hired a person to spend time uploading this boilerplate comment to every blog that has a post on leadership.

    I won’t say shame, I might do this myself. I have along with others posted a link to my own blog, not in self promotion, but to not have to rewrite what I wrote.

    This is not that. Robb is selling a book.

    Interesting.

    OH, one other thing, try saying something bad about Mormons sometime. The lid comes right off.

    There is a person in charge of tracking the blogoshpere for Mormon comments and posts.

    That AlGORE Internets. I blame him.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Why do these politicians even bother investigating themselves? Does anyone honestly think that an ethics committee controlled by Democrats is going to come up with anything substantive about a fellow Democrat’s corruption? And vice-versa for Republicans?

    Nope and when are the dems going to investigate circus clown Barney Frank and Chris Dodd?

  • Claude

    Why do these politicians even bother investigating themselves? Does anyone honestly think that an ethics committee controlled by Democrats is going to come up with anything substantive about a fellow Democrat’s corruption? And vice-versa for Republicans?

    Democrats circle the wagons for each other, no matter what. Republicans disown and throw each other under the bus as soon as the left expresses outrage.

  • http://www.myspace.com/thekingscourt4u Gman

    Charlie Rangel is a POS. He is one of the most corrupt people in or out of government.

    He should have been thrown in the slammer years ago.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    And the results of the investigation will be classified as privileged information….

  • http://robbthompson.com/ Robb Thomson

    Wow….thanks for posting this information.

    With leadership comes a great responsibility to uphold a standard of integrity regardless of the cost. All too often we see leaders compromise their lifelong forged ethics just to gain the ever fleeting reward of “momentarily getting ahead.” This lack of ethical leadership has greatly shaped the values of our society. Albert Einstein said, “Try not to become a man of success; but rather try to become a man of values.” John Maxwell coined the well-known phrase, “leadership is influence,” and no one would disagree with that statement. But ethical leadership goes much deeper. Ethical leaders don’t just influence others; they influence others to do what is right.

    As leaders we have a great responsibility to not only do what is right but also influence others to do the same. Temporarily, it may not be easy and most often it doesn’t appear to be advantageous, but you must weigh every decision according to the long-term consequences of that decision. Ask yourself: What will it cost me in the long run if I compromise my integrity? What are the negative consequences that come from cutting corners or from cheating my customers? What reputation will I create if I make this decision?

    Below I have outlined the three most critical steps to achieve ethical leadership. By following these simple steps, you’ll not only establish credibility among your clients, but you’ll also outlast your competition. Credibility and longevity are what separate those who “just get by” from those who achieve great success.

    1. Hold yourself to a higher standard than is required. Every failure in life can be traced back to a compromise of character. You must raise your standards and set the example for those who work for you. Don’t allow yourself to compromise your integrity, but be resilient to always do what is right.

    2. Keep your word. It doesn’t matter what you promise. All that matters is that you do what’s been promised. A leader is defined by the quality of his action, not the rambling of his words; therefore make it the rule to always under promise and over perform.

    3. Tell the truth and be honest with others. A simple definition of honesty is: behavior in words and actions that aims to convey the truth. Conversely, dishonesty is a way of speaking or acting that causes people to be misled or deluded. Always consider the interest of others and not just your own. I say it like this: I would rather you hate me for telling you the truth than for you to like me for telling you a lie.

    Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Robb_Thompson

  • di butler

    Stevens, Rangel and “Dollar Bill” should all be sharing a cell this Christmas.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development