Ed Schultz As Incoherent As Ever

The attack is on the from the conservative right. All you have to do is search on google for Ed Schultz, and I will give them a plug, and you will see some of the most outlandish things that have ever been said or written about me as a radio personality and as a person. One of the websites that caught my attention was the thenewrepublic.com. Where do they get this garbage? Stories made up about me that are outrageous, which actually is a compliment. These people are nervous. They want to do anything they possibly can to take me down before we get launched.
What stories are outrageous? And why is he taking them as compliments? He says that the attack is on from the conservative right yet he doesn't site any examples outside of "thenewrepublic.com" which leads to a website which does not even mention Schultz's name. A search conducted for "Ed Schultz" on thenewrepublic.com does not produce any relevant results.
Now a search for "Ed Schultz" through google does produce some results from The Free Republic website, which is probably what Ed meant to say. Of course, those of us familiar with Schultz know that he tends to ignore that which does not support his opinions or ambitions.
If Ed Schultz is going to accuse a broad group of people like conservatives of attacking him I would expect him to at least link to some relevant examples. Or to at least make some sense, unless this sentence makes sense to you:
Stories made up about me that are outrageous, which actually is a compliment.
Ed Schultz would have us believe that he's a middle of the road guy. He doesn't take sides, he just reports on the issues as he sees them. This quote is also from the above referenced KFGO link:
I'm not a left wing wacko, I'm not an off the wall democrat, I'm not an off the wall anti-American flaming liberal. I'm a guy from Fargo, North Dakota. I'm a guy whose got a track record in the industry of good ratings and hard work. I will bring entertainment to the microphone and I'm proud to say that I'm a progressive.
He expects us to buy into this horse-hockey while in the same breath he talks about "attacks" from conservatives and a want to fight against the "conservative mantra." How can you start off an article with a statement like "The attack is on from the conservative right," and then finish it by declaring yourself party neutral by saying that you are a "progressive?"
What a joke.
If you listen to Schult's current radio program, News & Views on KFGO out of Fargo, you will soon learn of his intense hatred for conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh. He accuses Rush of being a pawn for the conservative right. I would like to point out one thing about Rush Limbaugh: At least he doesn't try to hide who he is.
How can Ed Schultz decry the so-called "conservative mantra" when he has taken up a very liberal mantra of his own? Do his cries of conservative dominance not echo throughout the Democratic party? Are his views not very liberal? How can he claim to occupy the "middle of the road" when it is obvious that he is being supported by Democrats? Democrats even asked him to run for governor.
I take politics very seriously. When I'm going to give my attention to any type of media (be it television, radio or internet) I like to know where the host or producers are coming from. When I listen to Rush Limbaugh I can temper his statements with my knowledge that he is a conservative. With Schultz you never really know. One moment he's rallying against conservatives and the next moment he's claiming the middle of the road again.
I think Christopher G. Adamo summarizies the issue well in this quote from an article in the Sierra Times:
An October 28, 2003 article in the Bismarck Tribune explains how North Dakota liberal radio personality Ed Schultz is being recruited as a national radio voice to counteract the likes of Limbaugh and rising conservative radio star Sean Hannity. But the forces at work to launch Schultz as a major personality are not the normal commercial interests that invest in promising individuals with the hope of a financial return. Rather, they are, according to the Tribune, "Democratic lawmakers in Washington" who have pledged $1.8 million in support of their cause.
No doubt, they anticipate that conservatives will tremble in their boots at this possibility, as if Schultz has anything to offer that has not already been tried by CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, National Public Radio, The New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times (to name just a few"). Among liberals, it is invariably presumed that the manner of the messenger, and not the message itself that carries ultimate weight.
I don't think Schultz knows what he's getting himself into. If I were him, I'd stick to broadcasting football games because I don't think he's got a chance with a nationwide talk show.












