Dubai Threatens To “Hit Back” On The Ports Deal

What hysteria has wrought…

Dubai is threatening retaliation against American strategic and commercial interests if Washington blocks its $6.8 billion takeover of operations at several U.S. ports.
As the House Appropriations Committee yesterday marked up legislation to kill Dubai Ports World’s acquisition of Britain’s Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation (P&O), the emirate let it be known that it is preparing to hit back hard if necessary.
A source close to the deal said members of Dubai’s royal family are furious at the hostility both Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill have shown toward the deal.
“They’re saying, ‘All we’ve done for you guys, all our purchases, we’ll stop it, we’ll just yank it,’” the source said.
Retaliation from the emirate could come against lucrative deals with aircraft maker Boeing and by curtailing the docking of hundreds of American ships, including U.S. Navy ships, each year at its port in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the source added.

First off, I don’t think this is a good move by Dubai. Americans don’t respond well to threats, and this will probably only serve to solidify opposition to the deal.
That being said, can you blame them for being angry? They have been our staunch allies in the middle east. They have cooperated fully in the war on terror and have been instrumental in facilitating our military operations in the region. They were promised a 45 day review of their deal to buy out another foreign firm which is already managing the ports in question, and here not even a quarter of the way into that review period the House has already pretty much closed the book on the deal with many of the politicians all but calling the UAE a terror state.
The UAE don’t see themselves as terrorists. They see themselves as our allies and worthy of a modicum of respect. That they haven’t received that respect has probably done untold amounts of damage to our relationship with them and, by extension, our ability to operate in the middle east.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Seth Yantiss

    If they support Hamas, they should be out.

    There’s a parallel here to the current situation with the ROTC.  If they support Terror, then we don’t let them do "X" (fill in the blank).  If they want our business, they’ll play by our rules.  If they want to play with Hamas,  fine…  No ports or airports for you.

    But this should be across the board…  Certainly, Post 9/11. 

     

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    If our policy is only determined by the all mighty dollar, than we are no better than what the Left already portrays us to be.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    So they think that not buying our companies is going to hurt us?

    Hows that work again?

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    ‘what assures that our ports and borders are safer under control by American companies?’

     

    Nothing.  

    Nothing can assure that.  

    Does the Dept. of Homeland Security assure us that we will be safer?

    Of course not.

    Its the principle of the thing: American should be owned by Americans. 

  • mcair

    Let ‘em do what they want. When one of their neighbors gets a little itchy for some extra real-estate – well, who they gonna call?

  • mark m

    Two things:  1)"First off, I don’t think this is a good move by Dubai. Americans don’t respond well to threats, and this will probably only serve to solidify opposition to the deal."  I was thinking the exact same thing.  2) If they are such a staunch ally in the WOT I would think this deal would have zero affect on our relations. I can see why they would be upset being labled as not trustworthy but to threaten the US over this deal goes a little too far.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    A source close to the deal said members of Dubai’s royal family are furious at the hostility both Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill have shown toward the deal.

    The Dubai Royal Family can take a flying leap for all I care.

    We already had a Revolution to knock down a Monarchy thank you very much.

     

    TAKE YOUR BLOODY MONEY SOMEWHERE ELSE! 

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    You are hardly a conservative.  You are a protectionist, and for the most part confused and ill-informed.

    Thats probably true.  I’ve been listening to and reading from people who agree with me for so long I have become lazy.  I guess no more Rush, Hannity, and certainly no FoxNews (which I gave up on a few months ago already).

  • Tom_with_a_Dream

    What;s to keep this unnamed US company from hiring a US CItizen who has secret facsinations with Islam.  The whole thing is ignorant.  We are a global economy/everything and to think otherwise is silly….

    Besides, what about the ?Indianaoplis ? airport being run by ?which? foriegn country…. oh, I mean comapny (run by a foriegn country)?  And Rob’s air cargo terminal, and the west coast ports, and on and on… 

  • k dog

    If the bush administration had given this issue a little more thought, i’m sure this fiasco could have been avoided…. it’s a bigger blunder than not meeting with Cindy Sheehan, and I didn’t think that could be topped.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Seth Yantiss

    If the bush administration had given this issue a little more thought, i’m sure this fiasco could have been avoided…. it’s a bigger blunder than not meeting with Cindy Sheehan, and I didn’t think that could be topped.

     He did meet with Cindy.  He refused to meet her the second time.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    Well, maybe certain people will see that nationalism goes beyond operations on foreign soil.

    We talk about limited government, but it is an original purpose of the government to secure our borders, habors, ports, docks, piers, and beaches.  

     

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    the twits shrieking about blood money.

     If you are refering to this "TAKE YOUR BLOODY MONEY SOMEWHERE ELSE! "

    "Bloody Money" and Blood Money are two different things.

    For those in Rio Linda or West Palm Beach, "Bloody" is a British descriptive adjective that takes the place of another colorful word.

     

    I said nothing about "Blood Money"

     

  • electnixon

    Anybody else see this? I got it from a Knight-Ridder newspaper:

     

    WASHINGTON – Bowing to ferocious opposition in Congress, a Dubai-owned company signaled surrender Thursday in its quest to take over operations at U.S. ports.

    "DP World will transfer fully the U.S. operations … to a United States entity," the firm’s top executive, H. Edward Bilkey, said in an announcement that capped weeks of controversy.

     It will be nice to have the controversy over, but this whole mess sets a bad precident for our country not being a bunch of hypocrites.
     

     

  • Commenting

    "First off, I don’t think this is a good move by Dubai. Americans don’t respond well to threats, and this will probably only serve to solidify opposition to the deal."

     

    You have to be kidding.  Americans have completely forgotten about 9-1-1 and in two weeks they’ll be asking Dubai who??

     I’m not really fired up about the ports run by UAE either but a little research will find they have done more for us than Germany, France and probably Canada in the past 4 or 5 years and I don’t hear opposition to them.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    So you are against all foreign-owned companies operating in America now?

    Nope.  Like I have stated once again, America’s Infrastructure is different from other privately owned enterprises.

    I would say that anything that 1 cent in taxpayer money funded at ANY time, or that has even the slightest nation security implications should be owned by Americans.

    Some things are of the public domain.  Roads and bridges should not even be a private sector asset.   

     

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    What else do they need to do to convince you of this?  Stop being Arabic?

    Actually, 40% of the UAE is from South Asia and Oceana (aka Indonedia).

    So the whole "they hate Arabs" argument is hardly in play for those who have done an ounce of research. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Seth Yantiss

    Part of the reason I haven’t said much of anything about this issue is that I’m torn and waiting for more information. I liked the 45 day extension to know more… 

    I either want a sanction across the board for everyone or some clear understanding about where the line is drawn for Terrorist Sympathizers. 

    I realize that we cannot totally alienate so many countries, but we need to be serious when we say, "No Terrorism".

    Either way this ends up going, these countries need to know that the American people have a limit to the amount of support for terror that they are willing to put up with.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    Rob, Why should America empower Dubai to be an ally?  Didn’t Bush say "they are either with us, or against us."?

    If thats the case, this decision should have no bearing on the GWOT.

     

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    "Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." – President Bush, State of the Union Address September 20th, 2001

     

    What has changed that we must play a quid pro quo game now? 

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    Dubai already operates an air terminal in this country.

    Which I am against.

    I’m approaching it from a realistic, non-hyperbolic perspective.

    You like that word hyperbolic.

     Dubai Ports World already operates sea ports around the globe with no problems.

    Whats good enough for the world is not good enoug for us.

     Its a global economy, baby, and if you can’t embrace that you’re living in the past.

    Sorry for being a Conservative and believing America matters more, and should come first.  Sorry about that. 

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    Fair enough, though your hysterics still seem childish and naive to me.

    Your unabbated defensiveness seems misguided to me.

    So we agree to disagree.

    But Until our infrastructure is completely in the hands of Americans, I will not declare victory.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    Okay, from what you know, do they currently fund Hamas?

    I know this was directed at Rob but I will put my 2 cents in here as well.

    The UAE is funded by Iran who also funds Hamas.  So while there is no evidence that UAE funds hamas parentally, UAE and Hamas are sort of siblings. 

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    Well then what do they need to do?  Not be from the middle east?  Because to me that’s all your arguments seem to add up to.

    I’ve already said that.  America should be owned, operated, and secured by Americans.

     In the past they have made some serious mistakes, and even now they are not perfect, but they have come a long, long way in a short amount of time.

    So did Libya.

     

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    Protectionism isn’t going to get us anywhere, Dustin.

    Are you really approaching this purely from an Economic standpoint?  Is that what you think? 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Seth Yantiss

    Dammit!

     

    If they are not funding Terror, then they should be treated like any other non-democracy that we deal with.   

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    OWNERSHIP RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    If they are not funding Terror, then they should be treated like any other non-democracy that we deal with.

     From The Ports Fallout

    And from free market perspective—which, along with the promotion of liberal democracy, is part of the memetic message we are trying to sell abroad—this is a set back.

    Why are we trying to spread liberal democracy and free markets if we are going to be dealing with non-democracies at the same time?

    There are some really mixed up messages going on here.

    On the one hand we seek the

    "promotion of liberal democracy"

    and on the other

    "they should be treated like any other non-democracy that we deal with."

     Will someone please make a decision?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Seth Yantiss

    Okay, from what you know, do they currently fund Hamas?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    So the whole "they hate Arabs" argument is hardly in play for those who have done an ounce of research.

    Well then what do they need to do?  Not be from the middle east?  Because to me that’s all your arguments seem to add up to.

    Either way this ends up going, these countries need to know that the American people have a limit to the amount of support for terror that they are willing to put up with.

    Seth, the UAE is not a terror state.  In the past they have made some serious mistakes, and even now they are not perfect, but they have come a long, long way in a short amount of time.  I simply do not see any good enough reason to put a halt to that progress.  We should be embracing them for the help they’ve provided and they progress they’ve made, not shunning them. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Protectionism isn’t going to get us anywhere, Dustin.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    You have to be kidding.  Americans have completely forgotten about 9-1-1 and in two weeks they’ll be asking Dubai who??

    Americans probably will have forgotten about the ports deal two weeks after it is over, but right now the issue is polling super low so our coward politicians feel they have to pander to the twits shrieking about blood money. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I’ve already said that.  America should be owned, operated, and secured by Americans.

    So you are against all foreign-owned companies operating in America now?

    So did Libya. 

    The UAE is not Libya.  Two different countries, two different situations. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I’ve been listening to and reading from people who agree with me for so long I have become lazy.

    At least you’re willing to admit it.

    This isn’t about shilling for the Bush administration (though that is undoubtedly what you’ll accuse me of) but making the right decision.  If we want to solve problems in the middle east we have to be willing to work with people who are friendly with us there.  The UAE isn’t perfect, but they have been a reliable ally in the region whether you care to admit it or not.  They are not terrorists nor has there been any indication that their company is lax on security.

    Knocking this deal down hurts our long term interests.  That’s just the way it is. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    What has changed that we must play a quid pro quo game now?

    The UAE has been on our side.  They let us dock our military ships in their ports.  They re-supply our troops.  They have been instrumental to our military operations in the middle east and in the overall war on terror.

    They are on our side.  What part of that don’t you understand?  What else do they need to do to convince you of this?  Stop being Arabic? 

    Rob, Why should America empower Dubai to be an ally?

    We shouldn’t we?  We need help in the GWOT and the UAE can and will  provide it. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Are you really approaching this purely from an Economic standpoint?  Is that what you think?

    I’m approaching it from a realistic, non-hyperbolic perspective.  Dubai already operates an air terminal in this country.  Something like 85% of our ports are managed by foreign firms.  Dubai Ports World already operates sea ports around the globe with no problems.

    Its a global economy, baby, and if you can’t embrace that you’re living in the past. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Sorry for being a Conservative and believing America matters more, and should come first.  Sorry about that.

    You are hardly a conservative.  You are a protectionist, and for the most part confused and ill-informed. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Mark, there are threats and then there are threats.  The UAE is basically "threatening" a cooling off of relations in response to the way they’ve been treated.  Given what I have observed, I’m not sure that is such an unreasonable thing.  It probably won’t help their cause (it will probably hurt it) but i have a hard time blaming them.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Fair enough, though your hysterics still seem childish and naive to me.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Seth, do you ever stop to consider the idea that the more Dubai ties its economic and military interests to our own the more incentive they’ll have to go along with our global policies?  The more we deal with them the more leverage we have to ask them to reform and support our foreign policy.

    Spitting in their eye, after all they’ve done for us, is a terrible mistake.  I’m sad that so many are looking at the knee-jerk, short-term on this rather than the long-term implications. 

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development