Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, March 31, 2005

Don’t Talk About Abstinence

Sigh...

WASHINGTON - How should you talk to your children about sex? Tell them no sex, says a new government Web site that proclaims "abstinence is the healthiest choice." That's dictating values, say organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union and gay rights groups, and they want the site taken down.

Michael Leavitt, secretary of the Health and Human Services Department, says the Web site is right on target.

The site was designed for parents who are embarrassed about talking with their children about sex, Leavitt said in a statement.

"Parents have a tremendous amount of influence on their children and we want them to talk with their teens about abstinence so that they can stay safe and healthy," he said.


What's so wrong with the abstinence message? Are there parents out there who are promoting sex for their teenagers? Is there some doubt about abstinence being the absolute best way to prevent unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases?

The article continues...

Promoting abstinence is fine, said Monica Rodriguez of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, but the government should also address the needs of teenagers who are already sexually active, gay or lesbian, or who have been sexually abused.

For example, she said Thursday, the site should promote the proper use of contraceptives, and it should not imply that homosexuality is wrong by encouraging parents of gay or lesbian children to consult a therapist.

"By and large, it's a Web site that believes in abstinence until marriage," said Rodriguez, whose advocacy group promotes comprehensive sexual education. "Everything on the Web site is designed to promote that value and help parents communicate that value to their children."


The problem with "comprehensive sexual education" is that when you tell kids not to have sex and then tell them that they can have "safe sex" with condoms you undermine the first lesson. If the kids are lulled into a false sense of security about sex with condoms and other safe sex measures they are going to ignore abstinence and have sex anyway thinking that they can get their cake and eat it too.

That's just not going to work.

Comments

Avatar for WOOF

Celibacy is the most peverse form of sexuality .

WOOF on March 31, 2005 at 05:03 pm
Avatar for Kelly

I wonder when the last time one of these government directives made sense. They tell us to eat dairy, but don’t eat fat. They tell us not to smoke and they subsidize tobacco farmers.

Me

Kelly on March 31, 2005 at 05:03 pm
Avatar for Jadegold

Since AWOL George was appointed, funding for “abstinence-only” programs has risen over 1500%.

Yet, “abstinence-only” programs have the least success in preventing unwanted pregnancies and transmission of STDs among teens.

Yup.  Sounds like another AWOL George failure.

Jadegold on March 31, 2005 at 05:03 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

From the article, “Promoting abstinence is fine, said Monica Rodriguez of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, but the government should also address the needs of teenagers who are already sexually active, gay or lesbian, or who have been sexually abused.”

Why is this the government’s job to begin with?

likwidshoe on March 31, 2005 at 06:03 pm
Avatar for mamapajamas

From the article: “How should you talk to your children about sex? ...That’s dictating values, say organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union and gay rights groups, and they want the site taken down.”

Uh… “How should you talk to YOUR children about sex...”

“That’s dictating values...”

Excuse me, but aren’t parents supposed to dictate values???

Isn’t that what raising YOUR children is all about???

Where do these people get off making a proclamation like this?

mamapajamas on March 31, 2005 at 11:04 pm
Avatar for h0mi

Celibacy is the most peverse form of sexuality .

Hmm.

Tubgirl
goatse.cx
Child porn
Stile
A nun

And the nun is the most perverse of the lot?

h0mi on April 1, 2005 at 05:04 am
Avatar for WOOF

get thee to a nunnery

WOOF on April 1, 2005 at 05:04 am
Avatar for h0mi

but the government should also address the needs of teenagers who are already sexually active, gay or lesbian, or who have been sexually abused.

The needs of those who have been sexually abused? Why is this idiot equating sexual abuse with being “sexually active”?

h0mi on April 1, 2005 at 06:04 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.