Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Does the Law Apply to Everyone?

The Daily Tribune:

A Bartow County couple will go before a magistrate judge today to see if they will be arrested for allegedly stalking a Kennesaw police officer by installing cameras to track neighborhood speeders.

Lee and Teresa Sipple spent $1,200 mounting three video cameras and a radar speed unit outside their home, which is at the bottom of a hill. They have said they did so in hopes of convincing neighbors to slow down to create a safe environment for their son.

The Sipples allegedly caught Kennesaw police officer Richard Perrone speeding up to 17 mph over the speed limit. Perrone alerted Bartow authorities, who in turn visited the Sipples’ home to tell them Perrone intended to press charges against them for stalking.

Do cops speed or break other traffic laws?  Of course they do.  To tell you the truth I do a bit myself on occasion.  But when I’m caught I accept the consequences rather than trying to get the person who caught me into a huge amount of trouble.

I think this “police officer” should be encouraged to find another career.  The guy was apparently in the wrong and now he’s giving the police everywhere a huge black eye.  Hopefully the magistrate gives him a big slapdown when the Sipples have their day in court.

Comments

Avatar for Gluemanchu

"But when I’m caught I accept the consequences rather than trying to get the person who caught me into a huge amount of trouble. “

I always consider a speeding ticket to be the fee I pay to be able to drive faster than everyone else.

Gluemanchu on February 15, 2007 at 08:57 am

So, is the position this cop is taking that security cameras are illegal? Or is it that security cameras are not allowed to film police or their vehicles? Or is it just him that they are not supposed to film?

Last summer we had some jackoffs riding around smashing mailboxes. When I put up a new one I borrowed a digital game camera and set it so that each vehicle passing would trip it, in hopes of catching them. Does this cop believe that this is illegal?

How about stoplight cameras? He think they are illegal, too?

Just curious what actual reasoning this officer is using.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on February 15, 2007 at 09:01 am

Cops (speaking in generalities, of course) cover for one another.  My ex-sister-in-law worked for the sheriff’s department; she’d get out of speeding tickets all of the time.

Paulie B on February 15, 2007 at 10:02 am

A follow-up story says that the cop has dropped the charges.

Good call.


"Although I can accept talking scarecrows, lions and great wizards in emerald cities, I find it hard to believe there is no paperwork involved when your house lands on a witch.”
- Dave James

Steve L. on February 15, 2007 at 11:17 am

My mom lives on a dead end dirt road and she has a farm directly on the road. People speed by all the time, especially Budweiser-saturated hunters during hunting season. She got an old, large tractor tire and stuck it behind the house. When she was outside and she saw a speeder coming up the road, she rolled the 5 ft tall tire slowly into the road, causing the speeder to run right into it and smash up his hood and windsheild. He hopped out and started getting beligerant, so she called the cops. “I don’t know, the tire just got away from me. He was obviously going way too fast.” Didn’t get him a speeding ticket, but it got him a DUI. He still hunts at the end of the road, but he drives 10mph under now, at least past her house.


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on February 15, 2007 at 11:52 am

The “stalking” charge would not fly in court unless that cop can prove that the Sipples intent was focused soley on him.

I say “ call his bluff “.

bookm’Dan-o

Mickey on February 15, 2007 at 12:29 pm

He still hunts at the end of the road, but he drives 10mph under now, at least past her house.

Stupid move on your mom’s part… causing someone thousands of dollars worth of damage and possible physical harm to prove the point is not the way to get your point across… and the man was drunk with a gun in his car… stupid


I think Rob hates me… I mean, just look at the pic he took of me!

Sphagnum on February 15, 2007 at 04:49 pm

Sphagnum
Nope. The tractor tire was behind the house because she inquired with the road commissioner about what to do. It was his suggestion. Its rural enough there is practically no enforcement out there and that’s why these hunters were abusing it like they were. if you are on a dirt road with a farm that directly abuts it on both sides, you don’t speed through it. that is stupid. furthermore, every time the offender speeds through he also, through negligence is potentially

causing someone thousands of dollars worth of damage and possible physical harm


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on February 15, 2007 at 05:32 pm

SA, there is quite a difference between driving fast down a road and rolling a large object in front of a moving vehicle. One has the POTENTIAL for causing damage, the other has no other purpose other than to inflict harm and damage.

If your mother, as you said previously, rolled a tire out in front of a vehicle for that purpose, she’s an idiot.


I think Rob hates me… I mean, just look at the pic he took of me!

Sphagnum on February 15, 2007 at 07:40 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.